Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Rail gaps locations

1141 views
4 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
da1
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Alberta, Canada
  • 219 posts
Rail gaps locations
Posted by da1 on Saturday, May 8, 2010 4:12 PM

Hello all,

I think I know the answer to this question, but I'll ask anyway - it wouldn't be the first time I've overlooked something.

When gapping rails for DCC blocks, do the gaps have to be directly opposite each other?  What would be the impact if they are offset by as much as 1"?

My first answer is that it doesn't matter as any locomotive that picks up from all wheels is going to connect the two blocks together during transfer from one block to the next; all I've done by offsetting the rail gaps is prolonged that interconnection.

Am I missing something here, or is it okay to have a small offset in the rail gaps?

Thanks in advance.
Dwayne A

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: SE Minnesota
  • 6,847 posts
Posted by jrbernier on Saturday, May 8, 2010 4:39 PM

Dwaune,

  I suspect you are gapping for 'power districts'?  Or maybe an 'Auto Reverser'?   Some Auto Reverse units want a small 'offset' in the gaps to function correctly.  Is there a reason you want to 'offset' the rail gaps?

Jim

Modeling BNSF  and Milwaukee Road in SW Wisconsin

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Saturday, May 8, 2010 4:54 PM

I have LOTS of rail gaps, and I doubt that any pair on the same track are exactly opposite one another.  The biggest reason is that I prefer to stagger all of my joints, on both tangent and curved track.

The joker is, I model a prototype that "squared up" rail joints, with extra support in the form of closely-spaced ties under the joint bars.  I model the close tie spacing at appropriate intervals, but don't put my joints there.  Go figure...

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Westchester NY
  • 1,747 posts
Posted by retsignalmtr on Saturday, May 8, 2010 7:26 PM

On the prototype, the weakest spot on jointed rail is the joint. Having joints in line would put too much stress at that point of the track, especially if the bolts become loose. When I go trainwatching I see insulated joints for signals and crossings that are not in line with each other and are seperated by as much as three feet.

da1
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Alberta, Canada
  • 219 posts
Posted by da1 on Saturday, May 8, 2010 10:37 PM

Thanks for the answers, guys.

The gaps I'm talking about are between power districts (one booster to another).  There is no auto-reversing required on my layout.

My reason for not lining gaps up is to not worry about exactly were the gaps are.  On curved track I want to put my effort into making rail and insulting material that cannot be easily seen and is smooth and reliable.  When assembling flex track rail joints are infrequently opposite - more frequently offset by some small distance.  I haven't worried about joint location up till now, I want to continue to not worry.

So I think I'm hearing that there is no technical reason for placing rail gaps directly opposite each other.

Dwayne A

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!