Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Atlas or Athearn or ???? what should I get

2225 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2009
  • 20 posts
Atlas or Athearn or ???? what should I get
Posted by Ron51777 on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 9:22 PM

I'm somewhat new to MR and have been looking at the HO Atlas RS-3 and RS-11 and the RS-1 and the Athearn RS-1 RS-3 and the SW1500 and SW1000 I like the RS a little more just for looks but I have $80.00 and thats it, need help with what one is better, and this is for DC on a layout in a 10x12 room. or can anyone come up with better for the money, the turns are about 18. thanks for any help.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 9:39 PM

 Athearn RS-3 shell on an Atlas drive. The Athearn RS-3 shell is better detailed than the Atlas, but the Atlas mechanism is much better. So: best running = Atlas, best looking = Athearn.

                         --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • 20 posts
Posted by BNSF3704 on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 9:47 PM

 I am going to have to agree with Randy on this one as far as the Atlas drive goes.  I have not saw either shells, but Atlas has great drive mechanisms.  Another engine that you may consider is a Proto 2000 SW8/9/600 engine, that you should be able to pick up off Ebay for probably around $50.

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,892 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Wednesday, November 25, 2009 8:19 AM

Athearn and Atlas make nice engines, and I would recommend both depending on which models and road names.  Atlas generally run better, more like KATO's and Athearn RTR can be hit or miss with some of them running noisy and sounding like a coffee grinder.  More of the newer Athearns run well, at least the SD's.

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Wednesday, November 25, 2009 9:31 AM

I've got a Proto 1000 RSC-3 (six-axle variant) and Proto 2000 SW8 and S1 models.  All of these run very well.  The SW8 came with DCC and sound (for $100 on a Walthers sale, no less) and I've added DCC and sound to the others.  The P1K RSC-3 is much more "lightly" detailed than the P2K models, as one would expect, but I'm still happy with all of them.

I have 2 Proto 2000 GP9s as well.  Again, they run well and have nice detailing.  I found these at M.B. Klein for $40 each, discontinued items.  They, too, were DC and I added my own decoders.

Think about what you want.  Yes, you can get a DC-only engine and add your own motor decoder for fifteen or twenty dollars more, but if you want sound, you are probably better off saving your money until you can get one that's already sound-equipped.  It's actually cheaper to do it that way than to buy and install your own sound in a DC engine, and you won't have to worry about putting a speaker and decoder into an engine with no room for them.

If you are looking at Athearn sound engines, make sure you do NOT get one with an MRC decoder.  Athearn has ended their run of MRC-equipped engines, and has switched to Tsunami decoders, I believe.  The MRC systems had a really poor reliability record.  The upgrade to Tsunamis probably will result in lower prices for the older stock of MRC-equipped engines.  The prices may be good, but most experts will tell you these engines are no bargain.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: North Carolina
  • 758 posts
Posted by Aikidomaster on Wednesday, November 25, 2009 3:24 PM
I have had experience with both Atlas RS3 and Athearn RS3 using DC. That was about 5 years ago. The Atlas locomotives were far better in my opinion. They were more reliable, in that they ran smoother at slow speeds, did not stall at turnouts, and seem to run for ever. I have recently switched to DCC. North Carolina

Craig North Carolina

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!