Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

DCC signal buffering

4315 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 1,206 posts
Posted by mfm37 on Friday, October 23, 2009 3:14 AM

UpNorth

2000 feet of Loconet cable is not related to the snubber question.   Did they have the 2 bus wires snubbed is the question.

Marc

 

 

Yeah, you're right. The layout and its bus wiring did consist of 700+ 4 foot modules which would include at least 2800 feet of bus cable. You need to add for the extra "tails" on each module so that would bring it up to at least 3500 feet of bus wire. There were no snubbers used on that layout. 

Digitrax reps including A. J. provided technical assistance for that layout. They did find that the new LNRP's needed a 14 volt power supply to work reliably, though.

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 419 posts
Posted by UpNorth on Friday, October 23, 2009 12:41 AM

2000 feet of Loconet cable is not related to the snubber question.   Did they have the 2 bus wires snubbed is the question.

Marc

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: SE Minnesota
  • 6,847 posts
Posted by jrbernier on Friday, October 9, 2009 7:55 AM

  Our club layout uses Digitrax(3 8 amp boosters/16 PM42's and #12 buss wiring) and when the original article came out, we did some research.  We have Power Bus and Loconet runs in excess of 50-60 feet.  We 'scoped' the signal on several of the runs and then built one of the termination units and tested.  Other than a cleaner looking waveform, there really was no difference in operation.  I suspect these termination/buffer/snubbers might help a layout with bad wiring, but in our case - we did not pursue this further....

BTW - turning off 'Address 0'/DC support) on the system and in the decoders gets rid of most of the 'runaway' issues that clubs see....

Jim

Modeling BNSF  and Milwaukee Road in SW Wisconsin

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 1,206 posts
Posted by mfm37 on Friday, October 9, 2009 3:37 AM

 Buffers aren't needed on Digitrax layouts. There was this little 50,000 square foot convention layout last year with over 700 modules. Digitrax was there to provide technical assistance. At least 2000 feet of loconet cable was used. No snubbers were used.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,932 posts
Posted by Stevert on Thursday, October 8, 2009 10:57 PM

The RC circuits across the ends of the bus are often referred to as snubbers or terminators, and are usually only helpful when your bus exceeds about 30 feet or so.

Their purpose is to prevent spikes as Karl mentioned, and also to prevent reflection of the DCC signal back down the bus, a condition known as "ringing".

More info is available here

Scope traces are shown here.

Digitrax boosters seem to be less affected by spikes/ringing than some other brands (it seems that snubbers are discussed on Brand N's Yahoo! list at regular intervals), which is probably why they have no opinion either way.

HTH,
Steve

  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Ulster Co. NY
  • 1,464 posts
Posted by larak on Thursday, October 8, 2009 10:20 PM

It sounds like it's used to cut high frequency distortions (noise and spikes) on the bus. Exact values will theoretically vary with the impedance of the bus, but the values given in the article will most likely work in any "normal" situation.

I have not done this (I am on DC) but this type of use is commonplace in other areas of electronics.

Hopefully someone on DCC has tried it and 'scoped the line to see the actual effects.

Karl

The mind is like a parachute. It works better when it's open.  www.stremy.net

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: Sumner, WA
  • 242 posts
DCC signal buffering
Posted by MRRSparky on Thursday, October 8, 2009 8:40 PM

There was a recent article in MR about installing a buffering circuit across the two bus wires, consisting of a capacitor and a resistor, to do something about correcting a problem with DCC signals. 

I called Digitrax to get their "take" on this and was told they have no opinion, one way of the other.

They did mention that they thought the idea originated with Loy Spurlock.  Given the source, I'll bet the idea is legitimate. 

However, I'd like to know what it does and what is the problem with DCC signals that warrants such a circuit?

Also, has anyone done this and what where the results?

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!