Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Newer DCC systems and programming boosters?

1248 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 83 posts
Newer DCC systems and programming boosters?
Posted by darrel480 on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 1:09 PM

I am in the process of upgrading my dcc system from an Atlas Commander to either Digitrax, NCE or MRC.  One of the reasons I want to do this is because I have acquired N scale sound locos and want to be able to program them without having to buy a programming booster.  Will any of these systems still require the purchase of a program booster or do the newer systems all have enough programming power to program for example, a BLI Paragon2 decoder?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,932 posts
Posted by Stevert on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 1:22 PM

  I have a several-years-old Digitrax Super Chief, and have read/programmed QSI, Soundtraxx LC, and BLI decoders on it's programming track with no programming booster and absolutely no problems. 

  I also have a Digitrax PR3, and have had identical success with it, as well as having used it to upload new sound schemes to a few Digitrax sound decoders.

Steve

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 1:35 PM

I use the old Klunk, the Super Empire Builder by Digitrax.  The set is really outdated in some respects, but the DB150 booster has no trouble on small 'programming' tracks or on the main.  It can programme any decoder I have (Tsunami diesel and steam, QSI's of all sorts, Loksound 3.5,...)  What the SEB can't do is read to the user the current value in any one CV.  But all the decoders nod to the Emperor when they ride by. Big Smile

-Crandell

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,249 posts
Posted by tstage on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 1:37 PM

Darryl,

I have an NCE Power Cab.  The Power Cab is designed with a little extra oomph in programming track mode for just this purpose.

Although I haven't had my Power Cab as long as Steve has had his Super Chief, like Steve - I've never had an issue programming sound decoders with it.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 3:29 PM

The biggest problems people usually have isn't programming the decoders, but reading values back from the decoder.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • 595 posts
Posted by mreagant on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 4:45 PM

I recently took the jump from an old MRC Command 2000 to a MRC PA Wireless.  Although I'm still very low on the learning curve, it has been able to do anything on the programming track that I tried without any booster.  That includes CV readback on some decoders that are very early generation, as well as, resetting sound volume on a new BLI Blueline.

Well, in honesty, it did fail one task.  I repeatedly asked it for speed curve readbacks on one new Blueline F7, but got no information.  I solved the problem when I took the body off and discovered there was no motion decoder in it.  I guess it can't do the loaves and fishes miracle.

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Christiana, TN
  • 2,134 posts
Posted by CSX Robert on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 5:32 PM
tstage
..The Power Cab is designed with a little extra oomph in programming track mode for just this purpose...
That's not exactly true. As a cost savings measure, the PowerCab was designed without a separate programming track output. Since it uses the main track outputs for programming, it's programming current is not limited(this is similar to Digitrax's Empire Builder System, except that the PowerCab does have readback capability, which the Empire Builder does not). Systems that have a separate set of programming outputs usually have the current on the programming output limited(per NMRA Recommended Practice 9.2.3) which is what causes some of them to have trouble programming sound decoders.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 5:50 PM

CSX Robert
tstage
..The Power Cab is designed with a little extra oomph in programming track mode for just this purpose...
That's not exactly true. As a cost savings measure, the PowerCab was designed without a separate programming track output. Since it uses the main track outputs for programming, it's programming current is not limited(this is similar to Digitrax's Empire Builder System, except that the PowerCab does have readback capability, which the Empire Builder does not). Systems that have a separate set of programming outputs usually have the current on the programming output limited(per NMRA Recommended Practice 9.2.3) which is what causes some of them to have trouble programming sound decoders.

 

Although I keep hearing about this 'blast mode' option on the Zephyr, I never changed anything in mine and was able to program QSI and Loksound decoders. Some say you need to enable this for it to work, beats me. It's an undocumented setting if it's really there.

You can program ANYTHIGN with programmign on the main - you can even change the address, although not the 'active' one - for example if the loco currently is short address 03, you can set a long address and change to it, but you typcially can't change the short address. If the loco current has a long address, you can change the short address, but typically can't change the long address. Downside is you can't read back CV values on the main, but that's what DecoderPro is for.

                                          --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 6:03 PM

I have the Digitrax Super Chief, a PR3 and Decoder Pro.  So far I have not encountered a decoder that it cannot read or write.

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Gahanna, Ohio
  • 1,987 posts
Posted by jbinkley60 on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 8:28 PM

Phoebe Vet

I have the Digitrax Super Chief, a PR3 and Decoder Pro.  So far I have not encountered a decoder that it cannot read or write.

Same here.

 

Engineer Jeff NS Nut
Visit my layout at: http://www.thebinks.com/trains/

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Kansas
  • 808 posts
Posted by jamnest on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 10:32 PM

I have a Digitrax Chief which I still use an old MS-100 and DecoderPro for programing and layout interface.  I was told to buy a power pax to program sound locomotives and have it connected to my home layout via MS-100. With DecoderPro I can also use my MS-100 or PR3 as a multiple computer based throtles.

I have a PR3 to use with my laptop as I am working away from home and using the time to add decoders to my locomotife fleet.I have one of my Digitrax DB150 boosters on the road to use as a command station to test run locomotives.  It all works great no problems programing sound decoders with a stand alone PR3.

Jim, Modeling the Kansas City Southern Lines in HO scale.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!