Kutter wrote:nope they won't work. Digitrax is a 6 wire system while MRC is an 8 wire system. The connection's on the port are 2 different sizes.
The different connections they have are not the only reason, The main reasons are the internal electronic differences, the connections are only incidental.
Jay
C-415 Build: https://imageshack.com/a/tShC/1
Other builds: https://imageshack.com/my/albums
locoworks wrote: will it really?? i ask because i thought the funtionality of the jmri software was limited to what the command station can do? i know my old chief needs an upgrade to work the functions above 8 or 9 to 12, but my empire builder can run 12 functions out the box because it is newer. do digitrax actually have the 28 functions programmed into the command station even though they don't yet produce a throttle to access them?? we might be waiting for a DT900R with duplex radio to do all things ;-) in around 2020...
will it really?? i ask because i thought the funtionality of the jmri software was limited to what the command station can do? i know my old chief needs an upgrade to work the functions above 8 or 9 to 12, but my empire builder can run 12 functions out the box because it is newer. do digitrax actually have the 28 functions programmed into the command station even though they don't yet produce a throttle to access them?? we might be waiting for a DT900R with duplex radio to do all things ;-) in around 2020...
At the recent West Springfield show I spoke with Digitrax reps, they now speak more openly about their two way wireless system, they said it should be announced sometime in June. They also mentioned their DSC100 command station can support 28 functions, all that is needed is a throttle that also support it. They did not denied that a new throttle is in the works.
Jack W.
I have an older Digitrax Chief and I need to send it in to get it upgraded if I want to go beyond F8. The cost is only $35 and I need to send in my DT400R for repair anyway. The DT400R made too many trips to the canyon (concrete floor) and its brains are scrambled!
I had started another thread on what all of these functions might be. I would agree with Joe Fugate regarding trying to recall 28 functions when you are operating your locomotive. I received my first sound equiped locomotive (Atlas MP15) for Christmas. There are only a few sounds (horn & bell) which I feel that I need.
JIM
Jim, Modeling the Kansas City Southern Lines in HO scale.
locoworks wrote: CSX Robert wrote:I haven't looked at the function list for an MTH locomotive, but I know for other brands the most used functions are nere the bottom of the list. I have an Athearn Challenger with 28 functions and a Digitrax Zephyr, and I don't miss the upper functions at all. Also, if you have a computer in your layout room, the lastest version of JMRI will let you control functions up to F28 with the on screen throttle using Digitrax. will it really?? i ask because i thought the funtionality of the jmri software was limited to what the command station can do? i know my old chief needs an upgrade to work the functions above 8 or 9 to 12, but my empire builder can run 12 functions out the box because it is newer. do digitrax actually have the 28 functions programmed into the command station even though they don't yet produce a throttle to access them?? we might be waiting for a DT900R with duplex radio to do all things ;-) in around 2020...
CSX Robert wrote:I haven't looked at the function list for an MTH locomotive, but I know for other brands the most used functions are nere the bottom of the list. I have an Athearn Challenger with 28 functions and a Digitrax Zephyr, and I don't miss the upper functions at all. Also, if you have a computer in your layout room, the lastest version of JMRI will let you control functions up to F28 with the on screen throttle using Digitrax.
Wow, your Chief is really old! That chip upgrade goes back to when the NMRA changed the DCC spec from 8 functions to 12.
From what I understand, what the upgrade does is allow the Chief to pass along the commands for the higher functions, which are actually generated in the throttle itself (Information about the functions up to F8 is kept in the slot for that loco).
Therefore, whether or not you need the chip upgrade to access the higher functions with a JMRI software throttle would probably depend on how JMRI formats those commands - Are they the same as those generated by a hardware Digitrax throttle, or are they some other format?
I don't know the answer to that question, but I'm sure the JMRI developers can tell you:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jmriusers/
Steve
locoworks wrote:thanks for the info, i am fairly sure that the jmri decoder pro can't read back CV's using an empire builder because that command station can't? and this is why i assumed it couldn't send function commands either.
These are fairly unrelated facts. The difference is this....if the command station can't dtect the current being drawn by the decoder (which is how it talks back, it is very brute force) all of the software in the world in front of it won't help. As has been said, I think the command station just sends the packet from the JMRI software to the track, it doens't know or care what's in it.
Jeff But it's a dry heat!
I have to ask ...
Okay now, from memory (no cheating), what do those 28 functions DO? Can you list them all by function key correctly without peeking?
Or let's test your memory this way ... what's the 17th letter of the alphabet? The alphabet only has 26 letters ... so it should be easy!
While the loco may have 28 functions, if you have a reality attack, in practical terms you won't use more than 5 or 6 functions ordinarily. Figure out the 12 functions you would be most likely to use and remap them to your function keys. That will still give you more functions than most people will be able to easily remember.
If many of those sounds can be mapped to come on randomly or automatically on some event, all the better. I like lots of sounds as much as the next guy, but 28 function keys is mostly marketing hype to sell locos. You'll need a cheat sheet as long as your arm to remember what f-key does what.
Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon
As long as we are on this compatability thread......
Are stationary decoders, detection systems, transponding systems, etc. compatable between systems?
Dave
Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow
Oldseabeejim wrote:I know Digitrax planned to issue a 28 function controller last year but backed out.
I think you will find it is delayed, rather than that they backed out. In fact it may not even really be delayed as I am not aware that Digitrax ever officially announced a release date. There was plenty of rumor and speculation that it would come out before Christmas, but that is all it was, rumor and speculation.
Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum
Nope- you can't plug an MRC handheld into a Digitrax system and have it work. They're incompatible. The NMRA DCC standard dosn't deal with the throttle bus, so the throttles from one brand generally don't work with another's command station.
The exceptions have been the cases where a company manufactures a control system under its own name, and also makes one for another company. Lenz and Atlas was one such pair, and NCE and Wangrow was another.
-Fritz Milhaupt, Publications Editor, Pere Marquette Historical Society, Inc.http://www.pmhistsoc.org