Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Truck Safety Chains

4107 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Truck Safety Chains
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 26, 2006 12:22 AM
Can anyone comment on the application of safety chains to the trucks of tenders, engines, and cars. How widely were they used? What were their advantages and disadvantages?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Monday, June 26, 2006 2:10 AM
The chains were meant to minimize the lateral movement of the trucks so even if there was a derailment, the train wouldn't come apart and go every which way. They were sometimes on locomotive tenders
  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: Florida
  • 359 posts
Posted by BigBlueConrail on Monday, June 26, 2006 9:58 AM
I know that some saftey chains are use to help apply emergency brakes if a locomotive lost braking power.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Sydney, Australia
  • 1,939 posts
Posted by marknewton on Monday, June 26, 2006 9:05 PM
Really? Care to expand on that?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 4:03 AM
Perhaps BBConrail has in mind handbrake links or early efforts at mechanical braking? Marknewton has my meaning. Chains were affixed, usually at each corner, between truck frames and the car body, especially on tenders. In a derailment, the chains would limit slewing and hold the wheels close to and in alignment with the rails. Short wheelbase tenders, often top heavy and subject to water surging about in the tank, were prone to derailments, so became candidates for chains. Yet many tenders did not have them. That seems odd. Did chains bind too often on curves, so induce derailments? Did they delay parting of the air hose, and thus delay an emergency brake application, until the derailed wheels found a switch point to pick? Otherwise, it seems strange to me that such an economical safety device was sparingly applied. Would not the chains also hold the trucks on the cars, not have them fly off to do more harm in a bad wreck? If they worked well, why not always have them?
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,474 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 8:54 AM
Safety chains were only on tenders and passenger equipment from what I have been able to determine. That inlcudes REA and other freight cars like mail and storage used in passenger service.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 1:22 PM
Safety chains were applied to trucks on passenger equipment to keep the wheels more or less parallel to the car center line in a derailment situation. The same applied to tender trucks, especially on higher-speed locos.

Compare photos of passenger derailments with photos of freight derailments (where the unchained trucks are free to separate from the cars.) Passenger equipment usually remains parallel to the rails, which means the cars take most of the stress parallel to the underframe. Freight cars tend to accordion, and end up with a dozen cars side by side (by top, by bottom) atop about three carlengths worth of thoroughly torn up rail/roadbed.

Some tender trucks lacked safety chains because some truck designs aren't compatable with them. There must be a place to attach the chain which is clear of brake rigging and will not allow the chain to rub on the wheel in normal operation. There must also be something solid to which the car end of the chain can be attached. True Vanderbilt tenders, with their circular-cross-section tank bottoms, are a real challenge in this department.

Chuck
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 6 posts
Posted by lwolohon on Thursday, June 29, 2006 7:48 PM
As far as I can tell, truck safety chains were used to keep the trucks attached to the car when a derailment occurred. They were used on tender trucks, passenger cars & some express cars. Even my models of GN steamers with Vanderbilt tenders, brass by W&R and Challenger imports have chains on their tender trucks.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 29, 2006 11:06 PM
I`ve in all my perusing of railroad anything never seen any written standard as to safty chains or any guiedlines as to application.Is there anything in writing?
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,245 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Thursday, June 29, 2006 11:14 PM
Nearly all passenger equipment also had a locking center pin or "king pin" which prevented the truck bolster from separating from the bolster plate. Freight cars relied on about a 3" tall center pin and the trucks were only held in place by the gravity of the car on the bolster plate.
Once the brake rigging was disconnected a freight car could be raised and the trucks would stay on the rails. This simplified truck repair on the RIP track.
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • 3 posts
Posted by ATSF-3751 on Friday, June 30, 2006 9:26 AM
Last year while visiting Fairplex park in Pomona, California, I spent a lot of video on thier Big Boy (which has been beautifuly restored (externaly) I was intrigued to see chains running from the front of the pilot truck to the frame. Now I know what they were.
Thanks guys!
Bob

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!