Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

BL2 Info

2556 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Parkville, Maryland
  • 157 posts
BL2 Info
Posted by bnnrailroad on Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:45 PM
I think I know the answer to this, but I wanted to ask. Since it looks like the BL2 was designed to be run in either dicrection, did the C&O and Western Maryland ever run them in reverse?
Ray Boebel Boeville & Newtown RR http://home.comcast.net/~ccmhet4/trains.html
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, May 26, 2006 10:09 AM
Monon also had BL2's, but I don't recall ever seeing them run cab to rear when leading. It may have happened on other roads on branchline turns when a turntable or wye was not available at the end of the branch.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, May 26, 2006 10:42 AM
The photos I've seen of the BL-2's on the WM seem to always show them running short hood first and usually as the pair (81-82). When they were removed from road service and based in the yard they were normally coupled to a home-built slug on their long hood ends.

Roger
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: East-Side Seattle
  • 455 posts
Posted by bpickering on Friday, May 26, 2006 2:20 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by bnnrailroad

I think I know the answer to this, but I wanted to ask. Since it looks like the BL2 was designed to be run in either dicrection, did the C&O and Western Maryland ever run them in reverse?


IIRC, the BL2 wasn't designed so much to be able to run in reverse in every-day operation, as it was to have better visability during switching. As such, I think it would be unlikely that either RR would run them out on the mains in reverse.

Brian Pickering
Brian Pickering "Typos are very important to all written form. It gives the reader something to look for so they aren't distracted by the total lack of content in your writing." - Randy K. Milholland
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: SE Michigan
  • 922 posts
Posted by fmilhaupt on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 7:02 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by bnnrailroad

I think I know the answer to this, but I wanted to ask. Since it looks like the BL2 was designed to be run in either dicrection, did the C&O and Western Maryland ever run them in reverse?


On the C&O, this was done frequently. There weren't a lot of turning facilities on the secondary lines the C&O's BL2s operated over.

During the winter of 1959, C&O BL2 #1844 was pushing a snowplow down the line between Holland and Allegan, Michigan. Near Hamilton, the snowplow struck ice in the flangeways at a grade crossing and rode up onto the nose of the engine, crushing its short hood and cab. Somehow, the engine crew wasn't killed. After that wreck, the C&O made it its policy that any time that a BL2 was used in plow service, it had to run long-hood first when shoving a snowplow.


-Fritz Milhaupt
Web Guy and Modeling Editor, Pere Marquette Historical Society, Inc.
http://www.pmhistsoc.org

-Fritz Milhaupt, Publications Editor, Pere Marquette Historical Society, Inc.
http://www.pmhistsoc.org

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 9:40 PM
I've got a related question. When was the BL2 introduced? Thanks for the help guys.

Dave
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • 293 posts
Posted by Newyorkcentralfan on Wednesday, May 31, 2006 12:36 AM
Dave wrote:

"I've got a related question. When was the BL2 introduced? Thanks for the help guys."

BL1 2/1948
BL2 4/1948-5/1949

Eric
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, May 31, 2006 10:29 AM
The BL2 was a carbody unit (F7A) trying to be a road switcher, and it shows in the construction. Like a carbody unit, the underframe did not carry all the weight and a bridge truss along the sides carried much of the load. Consequently, it was expensive to build and not that easy to maintain since access to the engine, main generator, etc. was difficult.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!