Reading RR 4-6-2 HO loco?

[jblackwelljr]

QUOTE: Originally posted by dothinker

if you care to share, any specific reasons for #175?

I wish I could give you a valid reason why I chose #175. The builder has already produced the tender pictured with 175, so that helped a little. Also, I'm modeling post WWII through 1955, so I figured 175 would have been around in that time period. And...the picture caught my eye - that's what sealed my decision. No other specific reasons.

[Anonymous]

if you care to share, any specific reasons for #175?

[Mark300]

QUOTE: Originally posted by jblackwelljr

Mark,

This is a little uncanny, but I’ve already been in contact with Dave from Eddystone a few days ago. We’ve been corresponding and I think we’ve reached consensus on the project. He’s going to build a Reading G2 for me using #175 as the prototype. You can check out the prototype at http://www.northeast.railfan.net/. Look for Reading Steam Roster and you can check out #175 among others.

You may also want to check out my thread at http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=62414, on the General Discussion site. I initially thought the loco would be all brass and embarrassingly found out that it was not, but still a good deal for my situation. I guess I raised a bit of a ruckus over my mistake but it all turned out OK.

Thanks anyway for the info.

Best of Luck with your G2 #175 and post us a photo when it's complete!

Happy Railroading.

Mark

[jblackwelljr]

Mark,

This is a little uncanny, but I’ve already been in contact with Dave from Eddystone a few days ago. We’ve been corresponding and I think we’ve reached consensus on the project. He’s going to build a Reading G2 for me using #175 as the prototype. You can check out the prototype at http://www.northeast.railfan.net/. Look for Reading Steam Roster and you can check out #175 among others.

You may also want to check out my thread at http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=62414, on the General Discussion site. I initially thought the loco would be all brass and embarrassingly found out that it was not, but still a good deal for my situation. I guess I raised a bit of a ruckus over my mistake but it all turned out OK.

Thanks anyway for the info.

[Mark300]

Jim,

Check out this site....

http://www.eddystonelocomotives.com/


Looks like another decent possiblity.

HTH

Mark

[dknelson]

Actually from time to time you DO see those old Mantua kits at swap meets, often in parts or damaged which might be exactly what you want
Not their B&O pacific in zinc alloy but American made brass, and not very detailed.
As long as we are talking old, Penn Line had a Reading streamlined Crusader 4-6-2 back in the day. Those go for very high prices at swap meets.
Dave Nelson

[jimrice4449]

There was once in olden times a brass Reading 4-6-2 kit offered by Mantua, but this was in the forties so I think ndprr's idea is probably your best bet.

[ndbprr]

Well you are in for some cutting and filling regardless. i don't think they have even been done in brass BUT a good starting point would be the Bachman 2-8-0 that has the Wooten firebox already done for you. Then I would compare the boiler to the Pacific and possibly drop a Bowser PRR 4-6-2 mechansim under it. You could also consider the Spectrum PRR K4s for a mechansim but I don't find them to be as good. You will have to fabricate the air pump covers for the front porch but that shouldn,t be too hard.

[jblackwelljr]

Is there a 4-6-2 in HO that could be fairly representative of the Pacific’s that Reading ran? They had several versions, G1, G2 & G3. I’m new at this prototyping thing and am reading about Wooten fireboxes, etc (hope I got that right), trying to understand all the differences and terminology.

Do I stand a chance of finding something without having to play Dr. Frankenstein – or should I compromise at this point and look for something undecorated and just apply lettering/decals?