Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

SD38T-3

3083 views
12 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
SD38T-3
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, February 5, 2006 6:36 PM
are these locomotives real or are they just made up, if they are real can you please give some info on these locos. thanks
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, February 5, 2006 7:16 PM
Never heard of them before. If they do exist, they sound like they would be rebuilds of old tunnel motor units, SD40T-2's or SD45T-2's, derated to 2000hp and rebuilt to dash-3 standards. But again, I've never heard of something like that.
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Sunday, February 5, 2006 8:02 PM
There definitely were not any locomotives built as SD38T-3s. If any tunnel motors were rebuilt with 2000HP available to the traction motors and with post -2 electronics, it seems likely that they would just be called SD38-3s, as it seems to be common practice for most railroads to drop the T. Where did you hear of such a locomotive?

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Sarnia, Ontario
  • 534 posts
Posted by ShaunCN on Sunday, February 5, 2006 8:25 PM
never heard of such a unit
derailment? what derailment? All reports of derailments are lies. Their are no derailments within a hundreed miles of here.
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, February 6, 2006 10:26 AM
No such beast existed as built, but you might get an approximation of one if UP derates any of its SD40-T2's to 2000 HP for hump duty and renumbers them in the UPY series.

If you feel like modeling such a locomotive, go right ahead. We've given you plenty of justification for doing so, and after all, it's YOUR layout.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    July 2001
  • From: Shelbyville, Kentucky
  • 1,967 posts
Posted by SSW9389 on Monday, February 6, 2006 11:38 AM
I have to wonder if North Little Rock has contemplated such a machine.
COTTON BELT: Runs like a Blue Streak!
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Pittsburgh, PA
  • 1,261 posts
Posted by emdgp92 on Monday, February 6, 2006 1:13 PM
I've never heard of that engine. Some SD40s were rebuilt to -3 standards...making them, in effect SD40-3s, but I think those are the only ones. More info on SD40-3s here:

http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=9034
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, February 6, 2006 10:08 PM
Thanks for the input
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, February 9, 2006 3:57 PM
Didn't BL&E or DM&IR rebuild some of their ex SP Tunnel Motors to SD38 standards?
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Milwaukee, WI
  • 103 posts
Posted by ericmanke on Thursday, February 9, 2006 4:59 PM
As far as I know all of the DM&IR and B&LE Tunnel motors are still turbocharged.
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Thursday, February 9, 2006 9:30 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by 4884bigboy

Didn't BL&E or DM&IR rebuild some of their ex SP Tunnel Motors to SD38 standards?

I believe thay had SD45T-2s rebuilt to SD40-3 standards.

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 4, 2006 10:57 PM
Most up-to-date details available are: (Edited 3-13-06)

B&LE, while under the management of Transtar and then Great Lakes Transportaion, began moving towards newer motive power. They aquired old Southern Pacific SD45T-2's (under the management of Union Pacific) and had them modified into SD40T-3's....They now have road numbers 900 through 910. This will seem confusing since I did say SD40, thats four-zero, not 45. Athearn and others are modeling these road numbers as B&LE SD45T-2. Bessemer doesn't, nor have they ever run an SD45 of any type. Also, Bessember is vacating all their SD38's and seems to intend to run only trios and quads of SD40T-3's. Also, DM&IR is owned by the same company as the B&LE, and has been the sister RR of the B&LE for many years. They on occassion loan motives to one another. Currently, these RR's are owned and operated by Canadian National RR.

Some Great pictures of them here:

http://www.bessemerjunction.com/

Also see this site ref B&LE under CN:

http://www.cn.ca/about/special_interest/gltacquisition/backgrounder/en_Background.shtml

There is also a great article with photos and the story of the Tunnel Motors Inception and conversions as SD45T-2's via the Southern Pacific. See the Feb 2006 issue of Model Railroading Magazine, pages 19-21.


Regards,

Robert

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 7, 2006 10:44 AM
If it was real it'd be a Tunnel motor SD38-2 upgraded w/ -3 electronics making it a SD38T-3. I've never heard of them though.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!