Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

ERA ISSUES!!

1626 views
15 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • From: montgomery,Alabama
  • 183 posts
Posted by Philcal on Saturday, December 31, 2005 12:34 AM
Let me throw in the Southern Pacific's often maligned commuter service from San Francisco to San Jose. This service utilized Harriman coaches, and Fairbanks-Morse Trainmasters, and ran well into the 1970's. The service in it's later years also ran galley style coaches built by Pullman-Standard. The bottom line here is, it's your railroad, you run what you want. It wouldn't be too far out of the ball park to run heavyweight passenger cars with your 1st and even early 2nd generation diesels.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, December 10, 2005 5:46 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly

Of course you can always take the approach of "I like 'em, I run 'em."



Then again, you could take the Erie's approach: "we bought and paid for them. We're going to run them into the ground."

Erie only streamlined their Pullman heavyweights and really didn't changed over coaches, sleepers or diners ... at all really, come to think of it ... up until they stopped passenger service in the 1970s.

Take a look at the scads of 50s, 60s photos of Erie Lackawanna equipment on fallen flags.

http://www.rr-fallenflags.org/el/el.html

SMS
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Ft Wayne IN
  • 332 posts
Posted by BRJN on Friday, December 9, 2005 9:05 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by prr67
since my layout doesn't really have a prototype i could run whatever stuff i want.


Why not a "tourist train" or a railfan trip using the old heavyweight passenger equipment and a modern locomotive pushing a just-warmed-up 0-6-0 ? [:)]
Modeling 1900 (more or less)
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: In the State of insanity!
  • 7,982 posts
Posted by pcarrell on Tuesday, November 22, 2005 11:16 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by orsonroy

QUOTE: Originally posted by pcarrell

The Indiana Transportation Museum runs F3's, SD 7's, an old 2-8-2 Mikado, and a mix of lightweight and heavyweight passenger cars past my house all the time. I also have more modern freights running those tracks too. It's on an old part of the Monon line.


Actually, they have F7s, GP7s, a 44-tonner, and a 2-8-2. And the line was the old Nickel Plate Indianapolis-Michigan City line. The active freight part of the line is actually operated by a different shortline, since the state actually owns the ROW. Both rail operators have rights to use the line.


See, shows how much I know about the D word loco's! [:o)]
I was told by one of the engineers that those were F3's.

And you are right about the Nickle Plate, not Monon. The Monon line was a few miles west of here, through Carmel, not Fishers.

Wow, am I embarrased. The thing runs right through my back yard, and I'm apparently clueless. [:I][B)]
Philip
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Elgin, IL
  • 3,677 posts
Posted by orsonroy on Monday, November 21, 2005 9:01 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by pcarrell

The Indiana Transportation Museum runs F3's, SD 7's, an old 2-8-2 Mikado, and a mix of lightweight and heavyweight passenger cars past my house all the time. I also have more modern freights running those tracks too. It's on an old part of the Monon line.


Actually, they have F7s, GP7s, a 44-tonner, and a 2-8-2. And the line was the old Nickel Plate Indianapolis-Michigan City line. The active freight part of the line is actually operated by a different shortline, since the state actually owns the ROW. Both rail operators have rights to use the line.

Ray Breyer

Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Monday, November 21, 2005 12:08 AM
BTW several railroads kept steam engines into the 1960's to use on excursions / fantrips, CB&Q for example. UP never actually retired 844 (a 4-8-4) and kept using it up to today for such trains!!
Stix
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: In the State of insanity!
  • 7,982 posts
Posted by pcarrell on Sunday, November 20, 2005 6:56 PM
The Indiana Transportation Museum runs F3's, SD 7's, an old 2-8-2 Mikado, and a mix of lightweight and heavyweight passenger cars past my house all the time. I also have more modern freights running those tracks too. It's on an old part of the Monon line.
Philip
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, November 18, 2005 1:08 PM
Composite freight cars, although uncommon, were still in service into the 1960's. Many were built during World War 2 due to materials shortages. Fairly well known were the outside-braced box cars of the Wellsville, Addison & Galeton.

As mentioned above, heavyweight passenger cars were still fairly common, including more than a few which were rebuilt and streamstyled. GM&O ran heavyweight dining cars on its trains right up to April 30, 1971.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Friday, November 18, 2005 7:37 AM
Heavy weight cars were very common on trains through the 50's and 60's. No problem there. Especially on the secondary and commuter type trains.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, November 17, 2005 10:50 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly

Of course you can always take the approach of "I like 'em, I run 'em."


good point. i guess really since my layout doesn't really have a prototype i could run whatever stuff i want. maby even steam( doubt i will though)
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by davekelly on Thursday, November 17, 2005 2:27 PM
Of course you can always take the approach of "I like 'em, I run 'em."
If you ain't having fun, you're not doing it right and if you are having fun, don't let anyone tell you you're doing it wrong.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Wednesday, November 16, 2005 3:51 PM
Oddly there was a "Norfolk Southern" back then but it was just a little shortline RR. it was merged out of existence in I think the 60's, only to have it's name reappear from the N&W / Southern merger.

You could build a layout where you rotated eras between say 1955 and 1975. Heavyweight cars were still around in the sixties but more and more were being retired every year, since lightweight cars (which were introduced in the thirties) were being bumped off of the top trains and working there way down to local trains. Probably c.1965 most of the heavyweight cars around were RPO and baggage cars.
Stix
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, November 13, 2005 5:23 PM
thanks
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: Phoenixville, PA
  • 3,495 posts
Posted by nbrodar on Friday, November 11, 2005 11:27 PM
Best place to start are the historic societies:
D&H: http://www.bridge-line.org/
PRR: http://www.prrths.com/
Not sure about the NS one.

PRR merged with NYC into Penn Central in 1968.

D&H was bought by Guilford in 1984, but was quasi-independant. Canadian Pacific bought it in 1991.

Norfolk Southern (as we know it today) didn't exist until 1981, when Norfolk & Western and Southern merged..

Nick

Take a Ride on the Reading with the: Reading Company Technical & Historical Society http://www.readingrailroad.org/

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: North Idaho
  • 1,311 posts
Posted by jimrice4449 on Friday, November 11, 2005 11:25 PM
First, there was no NS. That era saw the end of EMD F unit production, with GP-7s and GP-9s and SD-9s being the mainstay frt power W/ GP-35s and GP-30s coming on line. If you're intereted in hvywt psgr go w/ Pennsy as they continued using P-70 coaches in commute service until the local transit authorties took it over.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
ERA ISSUES!!
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, November 11, 2005 10:50 PM
arg. i'm havin problems right now. my era right now is 1950's to 60's, cause i really, REALLY like the heavyweight passenger cars. what sparked my interest in mrr was from seeing an add for the walthers ones back in march. but the problem is, alot of my favorite freight engines are of a later or modern era.( SD40's and others) and i'm probably going to have alot of freight activity on my layout. but i want to have an era specific layout because my layout is freelanced, and i want some prototype stuff in it.

does anyone know of a list, or somthing, where i could find out which PRR, NS, and D&H were made in the 1950's and 1960's?

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!