RSD's

1099 views

4 replies

CSSHEGEWISCH

Member since
March 2016
From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
13,540 posts

Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:40 PM

RSC2/3's would fit in your era and would be most appropriate on a weedy, light rail farm branch that sees very little traffic outside of the harvest rush.
RSD4/5's are a bit heavier but would still fit on a light rail branch (C&NW in South Dakota) or in mine run service.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul

brazos87

Member since
January 2005
45 posts

Posted by brazos87 on Wednesday, July 20, 2005 10:39 PM

RSC's had an unpowered middle axle on each truck--used to distribute weight on light rail. RSD's had all six axles equipped with traction motors.

dehusman

Member since
September 2003
From: Omaha, NE
10,621 posts

Posted by dehusman on Wednesday, July 20, 2005 9:44 PM

Short answer. No, they would not be out of place.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

AltonFan

Member since
April 2003
From: US
1,522 posts

Posted by AltonFan on Wednesday, July 20, 2005 9:26 PM

Most of the RSD and RSC units were sold at the same time as their B-B bretheren.

Dan

rlandry6

Member since
October 2004
202 posts

RSD's

Posted by rlandry6 on Wednesday, July 20, 2005 8:42 PM

I know the Alco RS locos were introdeced in the 40's What about the RSD's? Visually, they look like RS's with 6 axles. Would they be out of place on a 50's layout? Were they longer than the RS's?

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Model Railroader Newsletter See all

Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!

Subscriber & Member Login

RSD's

Subscriber & Member Login

Users Online

Search the Community