Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Cushion pockets

4011 views
15 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2011
  • 1,950 posts
Cushion pockets
Posted by NVSRR on Sunday, March 18, 2018 2:51 PM

what boxcar types use the cushion coupler pockets?

 

Wolfie

A pessimist sees a dark tunnel

An optimist sees the light at the end of the tunnel

A realist sees a frieght train

An engineer sees three idiots standing on the tracks stairing blankly in space

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: California - moved to North Carolina 2018
  • 4,422 posts
Posted by DSchmitt on Sunday, March 18, 2018 5:56 PM

Doesn't answer your question, but found this:

"

  • Member since
    June, 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,020 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Monday, March 02, 2009 6:47 AM

There are basically two types of cushioning devices on freight cars that have cushioning (not all do, obviously): floating-sill and end-of-car. This ICG car has (had) a floating-sill cushion underframe. These underframes travel freely from one end of the car to the other, attached only in the center of the car. Maximum travel is usually 30 inches (older ones--pain in the posterior) or 20 inches. The actual cushioning device is supposed to absorb shocks and return the car to center.

End-of-car cushioning has been around as long as floating-sill devices, but weren't very popular until the mid-1970s, when all of SSI/Itel's "cushion service" cars came out. These basically absorb the impact at both ends within the drawbar assembly--travel is usually 10 or 15 inches. Most modern box cars have end-of-car cushioning.

 

Carl"

Cushion underframe cars have been around since at least the 1950's.  "Hydra-Cushion" invented about 1954 by SRI International for the Southern Pacific.  There were prior systems (the Western Pacific had cushion underframe cars in 1952) and other systems hace been developed and used. 

An identifing feature of cushion underframe cars is that the couplers stick out further from the ends than an non cushoned cars.

In the 50's-70's (maybe latter) railroads advertised their cushon underframe cars with "Hydra Cushion", "Cushion Underframe", "Cushioned", "Hydroframe", "Shock Control", etc painted on the sides. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ideas for cushion underframes go back a long way  - from the Official Gazette of the US Pantent Office Vol 200 Mar 24, 1914

https://books.google.com/books?id=kd42OYMLNt4C&pg=PA984&lpg=PA984&dq=cushioned+underframe+patent&source=bl&ots=eitw_Ko2h8&sig=cZdBML4KqE3UbqdZ3J2fLLCg12U&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj4l4CThffZAhVKPN8KHX-WBUwQ6AEISjAJ#v=onepage&q=cushioned%20underframe%20patent&f=false

 

I tried to sell my two cents worth, but no one would give me a plug nickel for it.

I don't have a leg to stand on.

  • Member since
    March 2011
  • 1,950 posts
Posted by NVSRR on Sunday, March 18, 2018 7:12 PM

Sounds line more of a road option than a being included in specific car design.    

A pessimist sees a dark tunnel

An optimist sees the light at the end of the tunnel

A realist sees a frieght train

An engineer sees three idiots standing on the tracks stairing blankly in space

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,324 posts
Posted by Overmod on Sunday, March 18, 2018 9:39 PM

Here is a selection of some options from the 'cushioning revolution' that followed the SRI development of hydrafriction (later 'hydracushion' but that hides the operating principle):

 
Most of these do NOT involve cushioning or damping between the coupler mounting and a pocket toward the end of the center sill.  In some cases there was a floating center beam caged inside the centerline of the car, and the whole car floated fore and aft (with longitudinal retardation) independent of buff or draft shocks.  The SRI approach was actually a kind of multiple-plate isokinetic brake actuated by a transverse hydraulic cylinder.  While you could probably model the car with 'cushion pockets' especially if you need it to couple and stay reliably coupled on sharper model curves, there is very little prototype embracing of that idea
 

 

 

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Sunday, March 18, 2018 9:48 PM

Wasn't there just a recent discussion about SF "cushioned under frame box cars" that also included the "cushioned couplers" ?

Great link, Overmod.

Mike.

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,825 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Sunday, March 18, 2018 9:49 PM

NVSRR

Sounds line more of a road option than a being included in specific car design.    

 

At one time maybe.  Modern box cars and reefers have them.  Coil steel cars, center beam lumber flats, 89' flats and autoracks have them.  The 60 or 70 foot cars used for farm or construction equipment have them.

Makes train handling "fun" on a 13000' manifest when there are a lot of cushioned drawbars in the train.

Jeff

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,324 posts
Posted by Overmod on Sunday, March 18, 2018 10:39 PM

Some may find the contemporary historical details in this court case interesting; I have not seen a technical reference that brings so many of the aspects together in one place in reasonably plain language.

 
 

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • 2,980 posts
Posted by NWP SWP on Sunday, March 18, 2018 11:04 PM

Has anyone considered a spring cushioned draft gear box for models?

Steve

If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough!

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Canada, eh?
  • 13,375 posts
Posted by doctorwayne on Sunday, March 18, 2018 11:21 PM

NWP SWP

Has anyone considered a spring cushioned draft gear box for models?

 

 
If you mean a funtioning one, yes, Kadee offered it (perhaps inadvertently) in their original K-type mechanical couplers of the '50s.  When I started in this hobby at that time, all of my locos and rolling stock were equipped with them.
I'll see if I can find one and take a photo.
 
Wayne
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,227 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Sunday, March 18, 2018 11:58 PM

NWP SWP
Has anyone considered a spring cushioned draft gear box for models?

...and if you mean the "Cushioned Underframe" with the hydraulic, sliding center sill Kadee has that, too:

http://mrr.trains.com/news-reviews/staff-reviews/2008/08/kadee-ho-boxcar

Friction, and rubber draft gear predates this by many years.

Good Luck, 
Ed

 

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Canada, eh?
  • 13,375 posts
Posted by doctorwayne on Monday, March 19, 2018 12:11 AM

Well, I apparently mis-remembered the set-up, as the spring was inboard of the post on which the coupler pivotted - the cushioning action was in the "pull" mode, as you can see below...

As you can also see, the draught gear box is, like the coupler, all-metal, and also like some all-metal rolling stock of the time, with sprung metal trucks with brass wheels, one side insulated.  A truck, accidentally turned around, could result in vapourised knuckle springs.
The lid of the box was rivetted in-place by the modeller.  Most of mine were attached to the cars with Pliobond contact cement - sometimes difficult to remove from the car over 25 years after they were installed.
The still-assembled coupler seen in the same photo shows the straight pin projecting below the coupler's knuckle, which afforded remote automatic uncoupling if the uncoupling ramp, a diamond-shaped metal casting, was elevated as the train passed over it.

Later versions of the coupler came with a short piece of steel wire which was to be inserted into the centring spring before assembly.  It was about half the length of the spring, and intended to prevent the spring from becoming fully compressed, and perhaps unserviceable.

Wayne

 

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Canada, eh?
  • 13,375 posts
Posted by doctorwayne on Monday, March 19, 2018 12:34 AM

Overmod
Some may find the contemporary historical details in this court case interesting; I have not seen a technical reference that brings so many of the aspects together in one place in reasonably plain language. https://m.openjurist.org/393/f2d/83/pullman-incorporated-v-acf-industries-incorporated

You're right...I certainly did find it interesting.  Thanks for that link.

Wayne

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,426 posts
Posted by dknelson on Monday, March 19, 2018 10:54 AM

mbinsewi

Wasn't there just a recent discussion about SF "cushioned under frame box cars" that also included the "cushioned couplers" ?

Great link, Overmod.

Mike.     

Yes, in a thread I started a week or two back, asking of ATSF's "shock control" slogan meant cushioned underframe.

http://cs.trains.com/mrr/f/13/t/268611.aspx

Walthers makes a plastic extended coupler pocket that simulates the appearance of cushioned underframe, at least when it is stretched out.  Details West makes a more detailed metal version.  In addition to a "working" cushioned underframe that Kadee came out with, John Armstrong wrote an article about how to scratch build one - in O scale but perhaps usable in HO.

I gather some cushioned underframes are spring based, others are or were hydraulic.

The Kadee Coupler (No. 6?) that Doctor Wayne shows was similar to what Varney had for a dummy knuckle coupler back in the 1950s - a spring part of the draft gear.  But the spring was stiff so there was no slow pulling out of the draft gear as there is with a prototype cushioned underframe when a train starts.

I recall reading that switch crews were and are cautious around cushioned underframe cars as the springs compress and hold the compression sometimes, and then spontaneously and unexpectedly release it sending the coupler itself out 10 or 20 inches.  Some guys were injured if they were unlucky enough to be standing too near or walking past the coupler when that happened.  

Dave Nelson

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • 2,980 posts
Posted by NWP SWP on Monday, March 19, 2018 12:20 PM

That cushioned coupler looks like it would be a pretty good idea. Did they work well?

Steve

If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough!

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Canada, eh?
  • 13,375 posts
Posted by doctorwayne on Monday, March 19, 2018 3:01 PM

NWP SWP

That cushioned coupler looks like it would be a pretty good idea. Did they work well?

 
If you're referring to the Kadees, yeah, they worked/work fine.  The spring wasn't intended as a cushioning system though - its purpose was as a centring spring, in the same manner as the phosphor bronze plate-type springs in Kadee #5s, or the "whisker" springs on the newer Kadees.

Wayne
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,852 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Monday, March 19, 2018 7:40 PM

Cushion underframes go back a little farther:

http://steamerafreightcars.com/prototype/frtcars/protoduryeamain.html

Sheldon

    

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!