Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

UP push plow from a Vandebilt tender.

2783 views
12 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Colorado Springs, CO
  • 3,590 posts
Posted by csmith9474 on Saturday, December 7, 2013 3:17 PM
We still have a few these sitting in the Cheyenne yard. I am no sure if they are used or not.
Smitty
  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Friday, December 6, 2013 9:48 PM

Mine is in black, with the aluminum/silver strips.  The photos I found of 900005, it was in aluminum / silver paint job with the strips.

Thanks for the info. I tend to research everything I find that actually excisted.  Actually, I think one of the photos I found was located in Columbus.  I think I'll keep it in the black paint, as I purchased it.

Thanks much !

Mike.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: eastern Nebraska
  • 219 posts
Posted by binder001 on Wednesday, December 4, 2013 10:29 AM

There was a nice article in the UP Historical Society Magazine "The Streamliner", I believe Vol.6 #3 that covered these plows.  Background - the great big blizzards in 1949 caught the UP poorly prepared.  Most snow plows were old and in poor shape causing a high failure rate.  After the blizzards the UP took a look at their plow needs.  Since steam was in decline at that time there were extra tenders available and some were rebuilt into plows.  These were placed in various locations through the system, often at terminals for branch lines such as Columbus, NE.  If I remember right the 900005 was often at Columbus.  Even if you don't run the plow, it makes a neat item to put on a weed  grown spur waiting its call to action.  Originally these were basic black, then at the end of the 1950's or early 60s the black and aluminum "barricade stripes" were added to the ends for visibility.  Later the plows were painted aluminum overall retaining the "barricade stripes" on the ends in black.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Friday, November 29, 2013 2:09 PM

I would certainly agree with everyone who suggests additional weight in a snowplow. As far as the operating cab function as mentioned above is control of the flanger and in some cases the plows had "wings" that could be extended left or right for plowing sidings or widening the path along the right-of-way. Flanger operators have to be able to see the flanger warning signs so they can raise them before encountering switch rails, crossings and motor-car setouts. 

I wonder if newer plows don't have a control stand so that the operator can actually "run" the engines through an MU connection to the locomotives. Anyone in the cab of an engine following the plow would have a visibility range of about five feet. I hear a common occurrence is plows derailing at highway crossings that get iced over after the road plows push the snow up onto the track.

Keep Warm, ED

 

 

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 6,251 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Friday, November 29, 2013 1:47 AM

mbinsewi
I'm still interested in what the train consist would have been.

Gidday Mike, looking a this video of a wedge snow plow. what ever it takes !!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RinMx0YA8xA

I find this snow business interesting from the prespective of living where a snow fall that actually sits on the ground for longer than half an hour once every several years would be an extremely unlikely event.

Cheers, the Bear.

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Thursday, November 28, 2013 10:42 PM

twcenterprises

Also, if it's a flanger in addition to being a plow, the operator will likely need to lift the flanger portion over crossings and turnouts.

Brad

 

After looking at the model, it does have the flanger, mounted to the front truck, underneath the main plow.  If I remember in doing my research on these, not all had cabs, and not all of these had flangers.  I'll have to double back, and see if the cab-less units had flangers.  Great point.

Thanks guys for all your input.  Next year, I'm setting up my Christmas train, and this will make a great addition.  I'm still interested in what the train consist would have been.

 

Mike.

 

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • From: The place where I come from is a small town. They think so small, they use small words.
  • 1,141 posts
Posted by twcenterprises on Thursday, November 28, 2013 8:48 PM

Also, if it's a flanger in addition to being a plow, the operator will likely need to lift the flanger portion over crossings and turnouts.

Brad

EMD - Every Model Different

ALCO - Always Leaking Coolant and Oil

CSX - Coal Spilling eXperts

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Canada
  • 1,820 posts
Posted by cv_acr on Thursday, November 28, 2013 1:41 PM

I'd agree that concrete over anything else is the most likely material to be used as ballast (weight). It's cheap, easily available and solid.

Certainly not anything liquid.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Thursday, November 28, 2013 10:22 AM

I'm with the Bear and Chuck. It's gotta be weighted, most plows are to some degree, as an empty car would derail too easily in such service.

I'd almost bet the ballast was sand, though. Easily available around the railroad and could be removed easily if conversion to another use was desired. Doubt it would shift much, even from bucking drifts. A little water would set it up like stone if that was a problem, as it would be winter when in use.

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Thursday, November 28, 2013 10:05 AM

Almost certainly weighted, since an empty tender is light and the plow/flanger/cab wouldn't have added much weight.

I don't know, but I'd expect the weight to be something solid - gravel(ballast) or, possibly concrete.  I recall seeing a gondola with a plow blade that, seen from above, had about 15 inches of cast-in-place concrete for a 'floor.'

My own Ki100 class wing plow has a full-height carbody, so no telling what's inside, other than some kind of machinery to extend and retract the wings and flanger.

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964 - with a snowplow that's permanently parked)

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Thursday, November 28, 2013 9:25 AM
The person in the control cab directs the movement of the train since the engineer can't see anything in front of him or what's being plowed.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 6,251 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Wednesday, November 27, 2013 11:26 PM

mbinsewi
just what did the operator in this cab have control of?

Gidday Mike, according to this site....http://utahrails.net/up/900000-snowplows.php the plows in this series  UP900005, UP900006, UP900007 and UP900008 were also equipped with a flanger.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=388970

http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=671535

At a guess I would presume that weight would have been added, whether it was water, allowing for expansion for freezing, or waste oil , another commidity a railroad would have plenty of, is only pure speculation on my behalf. Like you I will be interested in a proper answer.

Cheers, the Bear.

 

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
UP push plow from a Vandebilt tender.
Posted by mbinsewi on Wednesday, November 27, 2013 8:24 PM

I've picked up an Overland Brass (for only a few bucks at a garage sale) model of a UP push snow plow, road number 900005.  This did actually excist, and I have found pictures of this plow while reasearching it.  I've learned that the UP buildt these from Vanderbilt style tenders.  My questions are, did they fill the tank with anything for extra weight?  and what would the "plow train" that pushed this be made up of ? and, since they added a "cab", just what did the operator in this cab have control of?

Thanks,

Mike

Edit:  Here's a link to pics of the prototype.

http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/rspicture.aspx?id=153670

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!