Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Boxcars vs. Intermodal

21378 views
42 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Northfield Center TWP, OH
  • 2,538 posts
Posted by dti406 on Thursday, April 11, 2013 2:39 PM

Remember, a lot of the present container traffic is overhead shipping, with some going to the East Coast for transshipment to Europe.  With size limitations in the Suez Canal it is cheaper and faster to ship containers to the West Coast, unload move on trains to the East Coast then load for Europe.

A lot of this traffic will go away when the Panama Canal opens its new locks that will accomodate today's container ships.

Rick J

Rule 1: This is my railroad.

Rule 2: I make the rules.

Rule 3: Illuminating discussion of prototype history, equipment and operating practices is always welcome, but in the event of visitor-perceived anacronisms, detail descrepancies or operating errors, consult RULE 1!

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: The English Riviera, South Devon, England
  • 475 posts
Posted by Great Western on Tuesday, April 9, 2013 5:17 AM

Anyone who watches the Roanoke railcam, Roanoke VA, will tell you there are many trains which pass through with lots of boxcars in the consist.  There are many totally containers trains.

I think it can be said that most types of Class 1 traffic can be seen, at one time or another, passing through Roanoke.  Recently, and I believe they are new cars, could be seen grey coloured ore cars.

 

Alan, Oliver & North Fork Railroad

https://www.buckfast.org.uk/

If you don't know where you are going, any road will take you there. Lewis Carroll English author & recreational mathematician (1832 - 1898)

  • Member since
    September 2012
  • From: Fraser Valley, BC
  • 538 posts
Posted by Rastafarr on Monday, April 8, 2013 6:04 PM

BRAKIE

Rastafarr

NittanyLion

This was an unusual move, but I just saw a train of approximately 60 cars.

Every single one was a CSX boxcar.

Interesting. For whatever reason, I haven't seen a single boxcar since this thread started. On the other hand, it's always nice to chase the Canadian on my way to work. 

 
That's a oddity..Boxcars can be seen on the NE Corridor.

And, naturally, the very day I complain about not seeing boxcars, I spot a westbound mixed freight with at least thirty of them right behind the AC44s. Pleasant surprises, right?

Stu

Streamlined steam, oh, what a dream!!

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Monday, April 8, 2013 8:54 AM

Rastafarr

NittanyLion

This was an unusual move, but I just saw a train of approximately 60 cars.

Every single one was a CSX boxcar.

Interesting. For whatever reason, I haven't seen a single boxcar since this thread started. On the other hand, it's always nice to chase the Canadian on my way to work. 

 
That's a oddity..Boxcars can be seen on the NE Corridor.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    September 2012
  • From: Fraser Valley, BC
  • 538 posts
Posted by Rastafarr on Monday, April 8, 2013 6:51 AM

NittanyLion

This was an unusual move, but I just saw a train of approximately 60 cars.

Every single one was a CSX boxcar.

Interesting. For whatever reason, I haven't seen a single boxcar since this thread started. On the other hand, it's always nice to chase the Canadian on my way to work. 

Streamlined steam, oh, what a dream!!

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Potomac Yard
  • 2,767 posts
Posted by NittanyLion on Sunday, April 7, 2013 5:03 PM

This was an unusual move, but I just saw a train of approximately 60 cars.

Every single one was a CSX boxcar.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Thursday, April 4, 2013 1:12 PM

Never confuse revenue and profit.  It is quite possible that because of the amount of handling that it takes to move boxcars, while the trailers generated less revenue, they had lower cost and generated more profit.

The fact that the boxcar has to be switched on both ends (and more than likely one or more times in the middle) and the intermodal car might not have to be switched at all could be a huge cost difference. 

 

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • 596 posts
Posted by charlie9 on Thursday, April 4, 2013 10:54 AM

yeah, brakie.  the sad thing was we switched this traffic on both ends so we kind of had them locked in and i thought we should wait until the B&O or some trucking outfit tried to pirate the business away before we took such a cut in revenue.  olin corporation and the us mint were not going anywhere.

i don't want to start a horror story contest but we lost a real good shipper because the stations department wouldn't pay the overtime needed to generate the customer's freight bills.  they wanted to pay up on a regular basis and sometimes went 2 or 3 months without getting a bill.  then they would get hammered with tens of thousands of dollars in past due notices.   all to save paying some billing clerk a little time and a half.  this wasn't a service issue since they were located at a joint agency location and just started giving the other road the road haul.  it was kind of sad to see their traffic manager come over to the office and beg the agent for his freight bills.  we were kind of like a church without a poor box.

only reason PRR management looked more stupid that NYC was because there were more of them.  intellectual incest in it's highest form.  oh, well, at least they only mated with their own kind.

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Thursday, April 4, 2013 10:35 AM

charlie9

i guess that was progress.

charlie

Or as I called it railroad management at its best.. sadly shakes head.

I never could understand their logic or is it their misguided logic? Hmm

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • 596 posts
Posted by charlie9 on Thursday, April 4, 2013 9:56 AM

i finally have to shoot my mouth off on this.  a personal experience from many years ago.  i wonder how much early intermodal success was at the expense of lucrative box car traffic.   sometimes railroad management shoots itself in the foot.

i know change is often inevitable and if you don't do something, your competition will, but here is the case in point;

we were hauling a metal product from the St Louis area to Phila. Pa. in box cars going at a rate of minimum weight 120,000 lbs and a revenue of about $2000.00 each car load.  our intermodal sales people attacked the customer and convinced them to go with piggy back service.  a trailer minimum weight of 40,000 lbs at a cost of a little over $500.00 per trailer. 

i brought this up and the regional sales manager said there were factors i did not understand such as car utilization.    let me see, 1 box car = 2000 bucks vs. 3 trailers plus one and a half flat cars for only 3/4 of the revenue.

oh, and by the way, we provided the drayage for the trailers on both ends.

i guess that was progress.

charlie

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Wednesday, April 3, 2013 6:24 AM

zstripe
So in essence,the boxcar and or containers,become their warehouse.......on wheels..

Indeed..The boxcar still has uses and shippers are using them.

Another overlooked fact is the railroads distribution centers that  load/unload boxcars for off line shippers and receivers.There are contract warehouses that unload boxcars for their customers and store the material or merchandise till needed..Then when the warehouse customer calls these items is rubbered to their customers stores* or manufacturing plant.

*When a  merchandise order comes into the warehouse the customer's item(s)  is pulled,priced and repacked before it ships to the customers stores..

 

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Wednesday, April 3, 2013 5:01 AM

NittanyLion

There's two truths as far as I'm concerned:

There's the absolute truth.  That's X railroad handled Y of cartype Z.

Then there's localized truth.  Railroad X handles Y of cartype Z in an given location.

Back home in Pittsburgh, I'm not sure I've ever seen a reefer.  Ever.  Here in VA, the only ones I see are in the Juice Train.  But where my brother lives in Ohio, I see blocks of five or six of them in a general freight all the time.  Here, boxcars are common and plentiful in the trains passing through town.  I assume most of them are full of newsprint and lumber.  Back home, they were infrequent and often the big autoparts cars.

No, the boxcar is not dead and buried once and for all, but...it may effectively appear to be in a given area.  What's most important is whether or not they'd appear in your locale (although if you're one of those do anything guys, well then go nuts I guess).

There is one more truth, that a lot of people are missing,,, There are a lot of manufacturing,suppliers,and or distributors,that do not warehouse any more. They don't have the space or,the building to accommodate,large,volumes of inventory.. So in essence,the boxcar and or containers,become their warehouse.......on wheels..

Known,Fact...

Cheers,

Frank

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Tuesday, April 2, 2013 10:12 PM

dehusman
Not saying boxcars aren't important or aren't being used, but they are nowhere near as common as they used to be.

I suspect that would be based on location and traffic pattern.Today's 50' and 53' boxcars carry almost twice as much as a old 40' boxcar did..Some short lines makes their living delivering boxcars.

There are freight car leasing companies that's buying up used 50 and 53 foot boxcars..

We know solid reefer trains (except for the Tropacana OJ train) disappeared years ago and was recently revived by the U.P and a large produce forwarder..

I've seen this reefer train roll through Fostoria with its  64' reefers and its quite the sight and far from the old PFE trains I recall seeing on the PRR  years ago..

 

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Tuesday, April 2, 2013 8:20 PM

BRAKIE

Dave,I couldn't get those links you posted to work.

Try these

Link1

Link 2

 

Guys,I guess the railroad count the car style differently then you.That's fine.

In 1980 there were over 400,000 boxcars in N America.

Today there are less than 100,000

That's a significant difference.

I will go by the weekly performance report on the cars types handle during the reported week since it was done by railroads and they should know.

I still see hundreds of 50' general service boxcars roll by the house every week..

BTW..When you live within 300' of a busy NS main line you tend to see what is haul and I will tell you up front there is far more merchandise trains,grain trains and coal drags then intermodal on the Sandusky line.CSX at Fostoria is about even.NS still runs a lot of general freight through Fostoria.

Really cool, but near where I live maybe 1/3 the trains are bulk, 1/3 are intermodal and the rest auto or manifest.  That makes boxcars about 5% of the total cars at the very best.

Not saying boxcars aren't important or aren't being used, but they are nowhere near as common as they used to be.

 

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    September 2012
  • From: Fraser Valley, BC
  • 538 posts
Posted by Rastafarr on Tuesday, April 2, 2013 8:15 PM

They're certainly not dead on CN or CP. I see 'em all the time on my drive to work (which phenomenon caused this thread). I have yet to see an entire boxcar train. Mostly they seem to be in mixed freights along with tankers, containers, covered hoppers and the like. None of it's my era, true, but still cool to see rolling behind GEVOs through some spectacular scenery.

Streamlined steam, oh, what a dream!!

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Tuesday, April 2, 2013 7:56 PM

Dave,I couldn't get those links you posted to work.

 

Guys,I guess the railroad count the car style differently then you.That's fine.

I will go by the weekly performance report on the cars types handle during the reported week since it was done by railroads and they should know.

I still see hundreds of 50' general service boxcars roll by the house every week..

BTW..When you live within 300' of a busy NS main line you tend to see what is haul and I will tell you up front there is far more merchandise trains,grain trains and coal drags then intermodal on the Sandusky line.CSX at Fostoria is about even.NS still runs a lot of general freight through Fostoria.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Tuesday, April 2, 2013 6:06 PM

Reading these two studies its obvious that boxcars are on the decline and the graph on the ages of cars is a portent of things to come.

http://www.railsolutionsinc.com/pdf/Investors-Guide-2012-2013-Section1.pdf


http://www.railserve.com/stats_records/freight_railcar_statistics.html

 

The interesting thing is see is the HUGE drop in boxcars in the 1980's as boxcars were phased out of grain service.  That was a huge decrease in the need for general service boxcars.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • 699 posts
Posted by UP 4-12-2 on Tuesday, April 2, 2013 5:23 PM

Larry--

I did not say the boxcar is dead; I said the general purpose boxcar (of decades past) is dead.  There is a difference.

If one goes to the link provided above and reads the year to date NS carloadings, one would see that intermodal is king, followed by coal, chemicals, finished vehicles and grain.

The remaining traffic that can possibly move in boxcars is a relative minority.  Many of those boxcars are specialty cars built for a specific commodity, and not the general purpose one size fits all and carries just about anything 50' boxcars of decades past.

What you see in your area is what you see--but the overall numbers say that boxcars are a minority.

John

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Tuesday, April 2, 2013 2:19 PM

UP 4-12-2

So, I see boxcars in the yards--but out on the NS mainline they appear to be greatly outnumbered by containers of one kind or another, either single or double stacked, or trailers.

John

John,I respectfully disagree..I see lots of  50' boxcars on  NS and CSX..The boxcar isn't as dead as you and many others think..The number of boxcars reported handle by the railroads will prove that.

There's no need to second guess,prove or disprove the types of cars the railroads report they handle during a given week..They know and report.

That's all we need to know.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • 699 posts
Posted by UP 4-12-2 on Tuesday, April 2, 2013 11:52 AM

Numerically speaking, compared to the numbers of boxcars in service years ago, the general purpose boxcar is basically dead.

I owned one of the early 2000's BNSF diesel roster books, and it included a brief discussion that the railroad had gone from owning about 7000 general purpose boxcars down to basically zero within a year or two.

Many of the boxcars that remain are considered by the rail industry to be "specialty" boxcars.  They have a specific cargo they carry and may be captive to a specific industry--like Auto Parts or Newsprint.  Trains magazine carried an article a couple years back that basically said most of today's boxcars are specially built for a specific purpose--and if that purpose goes away, they may get scrapped.

Here in PA I've seen long lines of old yellow 1970's Railbox general purpose boxcars in storage a couple years ago.  Since those cars are approaching 40 years of age, the end of their effective lifespan (some cars are not allowed in interchange service between railroads after 40 years of age--tank cars get an extra ten years, I'm assuming due to the complexities of the coatings, etc. inside them) is fast approaching.  I have noticed recently that the number of Railbox boxcars in actual service--moving through Enola Yard on a daily basis--is less than it appeared to be just a couple years ago. 

Obviously there are former Railbox cars out there in their second, third, or fourth paint schemes, but those numbers are declining and I suspect that many of them are carrying the paper products as they are often seen in cuts with the known (and still fairly common) Canadian newsprint boxcars and the new TTX yellow hi cube boxcars built specially for paper service.

So, I see boxcars in the yards--but out on the NS mainline they appear to be greatly outnumbered by containers of one kind or another, either single or double stacked, or trailers.

John

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Northfield Center TWP, OH
  • 2,538 posts
Posted by dti406 on Monday, March 25, 2013 9:03 AM

Disregarding box car and container counts.  One of the reasons box cars are still used is that containers and trailers weigh out before they cube out.  A fifty foot boxcar is good for 77 tons of freight or 154,000 lbs. while a 53' container is still only road legal for 40 tons or 80,000 lbs.

As an example when I lived in Alaska our company would receive containers or trailers (the only way we could receive freight) of various oil products, case of cans, drums, large containers etc.  But we could not load the containers to the roof the best we could have them loaded was about 75% full.  By the way the cost to ship a trailer from Seatlle to Anchorage in 1994 was about $4,500. 

One of our competitors did receive bulk oil by Tank Car, Quaker State had a seven compartment car that sat on a team track for a long time while they unloaded the tank car periodically for each type of oil.

Rick J

Rule 1: This is my railroad.

Rule 2: I make the rules.

Rule 3: Illuminating discussion of prototype history, equipment and operating practices is always welcome, but in the event of visitor-perceived anacronisms, detail descrepancies or operating errors, consult RULE 1!

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Sunday, March 24, 2013 5:46 PM

Dave,That still doesn't have anything to do with the types of cars handled..NS just reported the number of containters..No big deal since IM cars is used in captive service between point A and point B and point B back to point A...NS 234 hauls stacks from Norfork to Chicago and 233 hauls 'em back to Norfork..Some days 233 hauls more air then containers.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Sunday, March 24, 2013 5:28 PM

BRAKIE

Dave,Go the next step and check this and get the real picture..Note the drop in trailers.Containers remain around the same level.

http://www.nscorp.com/mktgpublic/MKTGApp

 

That's a dead link.  Go back to my previous post, it has the live link, then you have to navigate to the report you want to view. 

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    February 2013
  • From: Saginaw, MI
  • 205 posts
Posted by Bob Schuknecht on Sunday, March 24, 2013 3:57 PM

Brakie, the same can be said of much of the CN traffic through Michigan. A lot of it is auto parts, and auto parts are shipped in box cars.

Many days you may only see two intermodel trains a day, one each direction. Very much different than other parts of the country where intermodel seems to dominate rail traffic.

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Sunday, March 24, 2013 8:33 AM

Dave,Go the next step and check this and get the real picture..Note the drop in trailers.Containers remain around the same level.

http://www.nscorp.com/mktgpublic/MKTGApp

 

Of course this still hasn't anything to do with the the number of car types handled and less it twisted and bent out of shape.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Sunday, March 24, 2013 8:12 AM

If you want more detailed system level information, look for carloading statistics.  It took about 3 minutes to find the information for the NS:

http://www.nscorp.com/mktgpublic/webservices/nscorp/carloading_links_mktg_graph.jsp

Click on the "Current report : Carloads" link on the top line

PS:  My estimates of the NS handling 64,2000 intermodal boxes was pretty close, the real number was 67,490 (I missed it by 5%).

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Sunday, March 24, 2013 5:05 AM

NittanyLion
No, the boxcar is not dead and buried once and for all, but...it may effectively appear to be in a given area.  What's most important is whether or not they'd appear in your locale (although if you're one of those do anything guys, well then go nuts I guess).

There are those that believe the boxcar is a oddity intoday's railroad business because like you say they live in a place full of IM trains.

Come to Bucyrus and watch the NS on the Sandusky line and you will see far more boxcars and open hoppers then intermodal.

 

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Potomac Yard
  • 2,767 posts
Posted by NittanyLion on Saturday, March 23, 2013 7:18 PM

There's two truths as far as I'm concerned:

There's the absolute truth.  That's X railroad handled Y of cartype Z.

Then there's localized truth.  Railroad X handles Y of cartype Z in an given location.

Back home in Pittsburgh, I'm not sure I've ever seen a reefer.  Ever.  Here in VA, the only ones I see are in the Juice Train.  But where my brother lives in Ohio, I see blocks of five or six of them in a general freight all the time.  Here, boxcars are common and plentiful in the trains passing through town.  I assume most of them are full of newsprint and lumber.  Back home, they were infrequent and often the big autoparts cars.

No, the boxcar is not dead and buried once and for all, but...it may effectively appear to be in a given area.  What's most important is whether or not they'd appear in your locale (although if you're one of those do anything guys, well then go nuts I guess).

  • Member since
    September 2012
  • From: Fraser Valley, BC
  • 538 posts
Posted by Rastafarr on Saturday, March 23, 2013 6:36 PM

The point I take out of all this is that boxcars, despite what I thought previously, are still very useful in many situations. Containers make intermodal transport more efficient, true, but they don't work for everyone and probably never will completely replace the good ol' boxie. Good news that!

Stu

Streamlined steam, oh, what a dream!!

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!