Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

F3 + F7 ?

4479 views
21 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 5, 2005 4:53 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Blackfoot69

Andy,
your answer is fantastic and falls short of my requirements !
Thank you
Michel
[B)]
I'm sure Michel meant 'fulfills [his] short 'list' of requirements !
English can be such a dog....
Also the D&RGW did it, mixing all types of F's [FT/F3/F7/- F7/9] and some early GPs for xtra hp...
when gearing suited I think- they were alaredy fully MU compatible anyway
[^]
dave
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Ma.
  • 5,199 posts
Posted by bogp40 on Wednesday, August 3, 2005 10:33 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Leon Silverman

The faster engine would have to be on the front only if it would still run faster than the slow engine while pulling the train. If the train length exceeds the pulling capacity of a single unit, both engines will be pulling regardless of their relative positions.


Regarding where to place the faster engine. When pulling a decent length train, say 10+ cars, the faster engine should be behind. I never used to think this to be so. But try coupling the faster engine to the cars and place the slower engine uncoupled out in front. The faster(or what was faster) engine will be slowed by working as it is pulling the rolling stock. You may even notice that the out front(slower) engine will start to outdistance the rest of the train. Most times while running this way, I will watch the couplers. The lead engine is usually just going along for the ride until it is needed for a grade. Check it out, I have run my 40+ loaded coal drags for years by setting the speed placements for minimal-crunch/push on couplers between engines. Have run Stewart ABBA, P2k SD50s, mixed w/ Atlas SD35s, GP38/40s with no problems to any of the drives thus far. Many of these combinations have run during open house for 4-6 hours at a time.
There are some combinations that just won't work, due to a great difference in speed between makers and drives. For short distance running there wouldn't be a problem, but for sustained hard use the drives could be affected by being overdriven or dragged.
Bob K.

Modeling B&O- Chessie  Bob K.  www.ssmrc.org

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Saturday, July 30, 2005 9:08 AM
I suspect that F-3's were rebuilt by the railroads to F-7 traction motors with time making them F-7's for all practical purposes.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Friday, July 29, 2005 6:42 PM
In later years,at least,AT&SF commonly mixed F3s and F7s.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Friday, July 29, 2005 4:09 PM
the PRR NEVER had FT's. When they came out the PRR was deep in the T-1, J-1 and Q-2 programs. The first road diesels onn the PRR were a set of E7's on the Detroit Arrow and were purchased in 1947. F-3's came around 1950. But the PRR NEVER had FT's. As farv as I have read they never even tested on the PRR.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: US
  • 2 posts
Posted by Matt1950 on Friday, July 29, 2005 3:36 PM
Refering back to Dave's comment/question about the PRR mixing FT's and later F-Units in MU lashups -- according to a long-ago article in Trains, the PRR did some major upgrades on their FT's with modernization "kits" from EMD in the fifties to make them all compatible. I think -- and memory fades at my age -- that the Santa Fe did the same so that they could use FT's mixed in with F7s and GP's on their freights.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 785 posts
Posted by Leon Silverman on Friday, July 29, 2005 2:27 PM
The faster engine would have to be on the front only if it would still run faster than the slow engine while pulling the train. If the train length exceeds the pulling capacity of a single unit, both engines will be pulling regardless of their relative positions.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Nova Scotia
  • 825 posts
Posted by BentnoseWillie on Friday, July 29, 2005 1:55 PM
Faster one on the front. If it's in the back there will be no tension in the couplers, and therefore the slower engine will be holding back the faster engine without contributing to tractive effort. With the faster engine in front the consist will still be restricted to the speed of the slowest engine, but all the engines will be pulling the train.

Just like a tug-o-war: you put the strongest guy at the end of the rope. [;)]
B-Dubya -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inside every GE is an Alco trying to get out...apparently, through the exhaust stack!
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 148 posts
Posted by leewal on Friday, July 29, 2005 12:37 PM
This discussion brings a question to mind. When double heading (model) locomotives and one is faster than the other, which one should be on the point?
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Dallas, GA
  • 2,643 posts
Posted by TrainFreak409 on Thursday, July 28, 2005 11:12 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Gluefinger

I'm sure that blackfoot didn't mean to sound rude when he said "falls short of expectations"- he said in another post that he has very poor English


He says "Falls short of my requirements" not "expectations."[:p] Sorry, I just had to do that, I can be like this at times.

Scott - Dispatcher, Norfolk Southern

  • Member since
    July 2002
  • 484 posts
Posted by Gluefinger on Thursday, July 28, 2005 9:53 PM
I'm sure that blackfoot didn't mean to sound rude when he said "falls short of expectations"- he said in another post that he has very poor English
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: North Idaho
  • 1,311 posts
Posted by jimrice4449 on Thursday, July 28, 2005 8:46 PM
The reason f-3s were the controlling unit in mixed sets was that the F-7s had higher amperage levels and if they were the controlling units coulld burn up any F-3s in the consist. There were cases where mixed models were intended. Many roads after WWII decided that they didn't need the full HP of a 4 unit FT consist and split them up into 2 unit sets w/ a new F-2 A unit (same HP as FT but looked like F-3) or F-3 A unit giving them a ABA set more in keeping w/ their requirements. I don't know how they addressed the transition problem
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by davekelly on Thursday, July 28, 2005 8:56 AM
Would the reason that some railroads didn't mix units have to do with the debate of whether an ABBA set was one or four locomotives? I seem to recall reading that the railroads wanted the set to be considered one locomotive for manning purposes while the engineer/firemen wanted it to be considered 4. Could this be why units weren't mixed?
If you ain't having fun, you're not doing it right and if you are having fun, don't let anyone tell you you're doing it wrong.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Thursday, July 28, 2005 7:51 AM
It was important early on when mxing the two that the F3 be the control unit. I don't remember why but the F7 was obviously an improved F3 and there was a component in the F3 that was subject to damage if the F7 readings were used for running the consist. Many F3's were rebuilt with F7 compnents later so the problem was eliminated. The PRR DID NOT mix F3's with F7's until very late in their lives. They kept all calsses seprated in the early years. There were two issues of the Keystone devoted to F units recently that will tell you more than you ever wanted to know about PRR F's. They are available from the PRRT&HS.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Robe Valley, Wa.
  • 719 posts
Posted by GN-Rick on Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:08 PM
Gearing is a customer order item independent of the locomotive
model itself-the gearing is in the trucks and they are completely
interchangeable-as is the gearing in the individual trucks. The
owner railroad had only to change out the wheelset with its ring
gear to one of a different number of teeth and install a suitable
pinion gear on the traction motor shaft and thus change gear
ratios.
Rick Bolger Great Northern Railway Cascade Division-Lines West
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 27, 2005 7:23 PM
Gee, Andy's answer was pretty clear to me. I would think the only reason that there would be any problem mixing units would be a mis-match in gearing between F3's and F7's that would cause some excessive RPMs in the traction motors. You may encounter a similar "speed"/ gearing problem between your F3's and F7's, particularly if the "faster units are "pushing" the slower ones.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,439 posts
Posted by dknelson on Wednesday, September 15, 2004 8:25 AM
One amendment to Dave H's post -- at one time the PRR, at least on some divisions, for some reason was strict about not mixing engines so they tended to keep F7s with other F7s, F3s with F3s and so on. By the mid 1950s they mixed things up freely.
One thing I never understood is how an FT could be mixed in with newer F and GP units sincd the FTs had a rather different transition system.
Dave Nelson
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 7, 2004 6:27 PM
The CB&Q had some F3A-F3B-F-7A sets, and they even mixed FTs with the F-3s and F-2s.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Tuesday, September 7, 2004 6:24 PM
The PRR ran them mixed all the time.

Dave H

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 8 posts
Posted by Blackfoot69 on Tuesday, September 7, 2004 11:43 AM
Andy,
your answer is fantastic and falls short of my requirements !
Thank you
Michel
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,300 posts
Posted by Sperandeo on Tuesday, September 7, 2004 11:02 AM
Hi Michel,

Not only did the Santa Fe freely mix its passenger F3s and F7s in the 1950s, it gradually upgraded and rebuilt its F3s until it was often dificult to tell them from the F7s except by the number series. For all you probably will ever want to know about Santa Fe F units, go to the Santa Fe Ry. Historical & Modeling Society Web site at www.atsfrr.net and look under "Online Resources."

So long,

Andy

Andy Sperandeo MODEL RAILROADER Magazine

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 8 posts
F3 + F7 ?
Posted by Blackfoot69 on Tuesday, September 7, 2004 10:22 AM
Hello, [:)]
Is it possible to see F3 A/B running with F7 A/B ?
I have Genesis F3 A/B Santa Fe Warbonnet and I would like put them with the new Genesis F7 A/B and the new cars Super Chief ... I don't know if it's right or completely unrealistic and stupid ? [:I]
thanks
Michel

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!