Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Yard switcher as a passenger locomotive.

7080 views
23 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 1:28 PM
 f14aplusfl wrote:

"If a locomotive with a low tractive effort is coupled with locomotives having a substantially higher tractive effort, the wheels on the lower rated locomotive will begin slipping while accelerating a heavy train long before the other locomotives. This is why you will never see an SW1500, which has a tractive effort rating of only 42,000lbs, running in a consist of road units such as the SD40-2, which has a rating of 83,000lbs. In such a situation, the SW1500 will be shut down and in tow. So modelers, take this into consideration when assigning locomotives to your trains."

From: Conrail Cyclopedia EMD SD40-2: Prototype Info

I don't know if I can accept your theory.  I don't believe it could only be a function of tractive effort (which was equal to one-forth of the weight on powered axles).  A more plausible theory, and I don't know if this is true either, would be the ratio between horsepower and weight per powered axle.

Let's compare 3 early Southern Pacific road switchers: the SW900, SD9 and GP9.  (Yes, the SP used SW900s as roadswitchers -- they put train number boards on them.)

The SW900 (900 hp, 232,600 lb. weight-on-drivers, 4 axles, 58,150 lb. tractive effort) had a 258 pounds per horsepower.

The SD9 (1750 hp, 328,340 lb. weight-on-drivers, 6 axles, 82,085 lb. tractive effort) had 188 pounds per horsepower.

The GP9 (1750 hp, 248,420 lb. weight-on-drivers, 4 axles, 62,105 lb. tractive effort) had 142 pounds per horsepower.

Even though the GP9 and SW900 had the nearly the same tractive effort, the GP9 would slip its drivers before the SW900 if one accepts the axle weight/horsepower theory.  Similarly, the SD9 with 41% more TE, would slip before the SW900 also.

Mark

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 5:43 AM

Hello Mike,

That sounds like an interesting train,what livery were the SW1200s painted in?and what sort of cars were used for the steam generator?

Malcolm.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 40 posts
Posted by ironrails on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 7:27 PM

Hello:

During the early 60s, CN reportedly occasionally used an SW1200RS on the passenger train between Jasper and Prince Rupert via Prince George. It was a relatively short train of conventional cars at the time. Steam heat was provided by one of CN's steam generator cars. 

However, at the time CN considered an SW1200RS (a GMD SW1200 switcher modified with flexicoil road trucks, larger fuel tank, MU and road number boards) to be a road switcher and not a switcher. Some SW1200RSs are still around on CN's roster, but they are definitely used as switchers now.

There was a lot of variation in the consist of that train during the later 50s to 60s. RDCs were also tried before they settled back into using conventional equipment on that run. That train still runs today as VIA's Skeena with run of the mill F40PHs. 

Mike

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 88 posts
Posted by f14aplusfl on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 11:11 PM

You might see them on a transfer run... i.e. taking passenger cars from the yard to the car shop for inspection. Not sure if this helps but I think a locomotive strickly used as a "yard switcher locomotive" would be a last resort. Also keep in mind road locomotives may have some equipment for signals and stuff they may or may not be mounted in those used strictly for yard use and vise versa. In that case, a yard switcher may not be cleared to operate on the mainline unless another unit is in the lead. While on that topic, yard switchers may not be mu capable. Additional units maybe needed depending on the weight and length of the train. It is an issue of tractive effort. Wheel-slippage is such an important issue and railroads assign locomotives of similar tractive efforts to a train.

"If a locomotive with a low tractive effort is coupled with locomotives having a substantially higher tractive effort, the wheels on the lower rated locomotive will begin slipping while accelerating a heavy train long before the other locomotives. This is why you will never see an SW1500, which has a tractive effort rating of only 42,000lbs, running in a consist of road units such as the SD40-2, which has a rating of 83,000lbs. In such a situation, the SW1500 will be shut down and in tow. So modelers, take this into consideration when assigning locomotives to your trains."

From: Conrail Cyclopedia EMD SD40-2: Prototype Info

Florida East Coast Railway - Flagler System "Speedway to America's Playground" Roads bad, Trains better.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:31 AM

Interesting notion that,here in the UK some of our heritage railways use 4 and 6 wheel shunters (switchers) steam and diesel doing brake van (like a 4 wheel bobber) runs but under our health and safety laws riding in a gondola type wagon is forbidden.

Malcolm.

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Dearborn Heights, Michigan
  • 364 posts
Posted by delray1967 on Tuesday, October 23, 2007 5:04 PM
This may be a little late, but I've seen pictures of a SW-type locomotive pulling an 'employee train' with just one heavyweight coach.  Also, factory tours.  The factory tours are neat trains to model, a couple of gondolas filled with people standing and holding cameras, binoculars, children, notepads and anything else you could reason and maybe and old coach or business car for the VIP's.  The employee trains would be more regular (we don't want our employees to be late!) but maybe more appropriate for mining or rural areas.

http://delray1967.shutterfly.com/pictures/5

SEMI Free-Mo@groups.io

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago
  • 41 posts
Posted by CPD95 on Friday, October 12, 2007 3:45 PM
It's a VO-1000
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Friday, October 12, 2007 9:10 AM
Well NP used Baldwin road switchers on some branchlines (RS-12's maybe?) as did some other roads, but road switchers aren't switchers. Does the pic on pg 22 say what model engine it is??
Stix
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago
  • 41 posts
Posted by CPD95 on Thursday, October 11, 2007 6:57 PM

There are many examples of switchers being used for branchline passenger service. Some examples are the Wabash which used a lima switcher on it's Columbia (missouri) branch line and the Pennsy used baldwin switchers on some of it's commuter branch lines. Also, page 22 of this months Model Railroader shows a Frisco baldwin switcher pulling a mixed train.

                                                                                                 Dale.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 5:06 PM

Hello Paul,

Thank you for your reply to my question on using switchers on passenger trains.You bought up another favourite subject of mine,doodlebugs.I kitbashed a couple from the Roundhouse Harriman coach.For M1 I used a combine and cut off the end bulkheads to above the floor and used the inside bulkheads as the cabfront and opened up a window in the side for the engineerand use 1/2 mm evergreen clapboard as radiator shutter on t.I hope you liked my idesahe front ,then cut the roof above the motor area and fiited it with a flat roof with plastic tube for the stacks and details associates captop fans on square tube section and a hole was cut in the floor for a SPUD and a very large heavy steel weight was added to slow the SPUD,it sounds complicated but it worked.I also made a combine/caboose from another Harriman by cutting a section of roof to accommodate an Athearn wide vision cupola near the baggage doors again an interesting looking coach which goes well with a mixed train .I hope you liked my ideas.

Regards,Malcolm. 

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 2:51 PM

As referenced above the Maryland and Pennsylvania used their NW2 (and possible their SW9) for passenger duty.  According to Hilton's book, this was done on Saturdays when they weren't being used for freights.  This was done to save money as it was cheaper to use the diesels than the gas electrics.  During the week they used their gas electrics (they had 2).   The NW2 was a standard EMD switcher, but was used as a road engine on the Ma&Pa. Prior to Oct 1951 there were two round trip passenger cars a day, and when one of the gas electrics was unavailable during the week they used steam, a 4-4-0 or a 4-6-0.

Interestingly, the gas electric pulled a mail/baggage car, but the diesel had to pull both the mail/baggage and a coach.  

Enjoy

Paul 

 

If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 1:36 PM

Well we get into a problem of "what is a switcher??". The NW-5 and RS-1 (and you might argue, the MP-15) were road switchers not switch engines. "RS = Road Switcher". The RS-1 began production in 1941 and I think from the outset could be ordered with a steam generator for passenger service. The NW-5 was basically an early road switcher - an NW-2 type switcher with an additional section behind the cab for the steam generator.

Classic Trains had something a few issues back on a I think an 0-6-0 being used on an emergency passenger run, because it had the connections for passenger car steam heat (it was used to switch passenger cars in a terminal) and was the only engine available due to a blizzard. But such uses of a steam or diesel switcher (not road switcher) on passenger trains would be very very rare and isolated incidents. 

Stix
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 12:43 AM

The only examples I have known first-hand are on tourist railroads, as in the "sawmill line" in eastern Victoria Island (steam-powered sawmill there) and at Sacramento, California along the Sacramento River.  If you include geared locomotives, there are lots more in "my neighborhood."  Get real: how about  4-4-0, 2-6-0, 2-8-0, and 2-6-2 if you're looking for "lower-end" steam locomotives?  Forget diesel-electric switchers as passenger locomotives, at least before SD-7s with boilers (as used on the Northwestern Pacifiic), and similarly-equipped SD-9s and GP-7/9s elsewhere, or maybe some Baldwin AS-616s in mixed passenger/freight service, and little else later on.

Mark

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 12:14 PM

LIRR regularly assigned MP15AC's to suburban trains on the Oyster Bay branch.  HEP was supplied by the power/cab car on the other end.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 9:05 AM
I guess it depends on how you interpret the question.  Yes there are always exceptions.  even the PRR used a k4 in freight service occasionally but as a rule of thumb regarding a dedicated yard switcher I still stand by my statement it would be used only in an emergency situation.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Northfield Center TWP, OH
  • 2,538 posts
Posted by dti406 on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 8:43 AM

EMD built some NW-5 Switchers that were sort of a predessor of the GP-7 and BL-1.  It also competed with the Alco RS-1. 

These switchers were equiped with steam generators and Blomberg Road Trucks.  I believe that EMD made 13 of these. 10 to the Great Northers, 2 to the Detroit Union Terminal, and 1 to the Southern.

 

Rick 

 

Rule 1: This is my railroad.

Rule 2: I make the rules.

Rule 3: Illuminating discussion of prototype history, equipment and operating practices is always welcome, but in the event of visitor-perceived anacronisms, detail descrepancies or operating errors, consult RULE 1!

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  • 575 posts
Posted by alfadawg01 on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 7:45 AM

 BillD53A wrote:
I -THINK-   I'm not sure but I THINK LIRR used MP15s or SW 15s or whatever as power on commuters.  But I am not sure.

Yes, indeed, they have MP15AC's that are occasionally used on commuter trains.....some are even wired to provide head-end power.

Bill

http://www.wjwcreative.com
http://www.soundcloud.com/wjwilcox

"Never try to teach a pig to sing.  It wastes your time and annoys the pig"

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • 299 posts
Posted by BillyDee53 on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 5:41 AM
I -THINK-   I'm not sure but I THINK LIRR used MP15s or SW 15s or whatever as power on commuters.  But I am not sure.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  • 575 posts
Posted by alfadawg01 on Monday, October 8, 2007 8:47 PM
On page 16 of Donald V. Jewell's 1974-1976 Southern Pacific Motive Power Annual there is a photo of SP SW900 4633 pulling combine 3302 through Longvale, California, as SP subsidiary Northwestern Pacific train 3, the Redwood, on August 2 1964.  The run was usually covered by SP Budd RDC 10, but it was out of service for repairs following a grade crossing accident, hence the substitute equipment.

Bill

http://www.wjwcreative.com
http://www.soundcloud.com/wjwilcox

"Never try to teach a pig to sing.  It wastes your time and annoys the pig"

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Monday, October 8, 2007 6:13 PM

The gearing was normally the same as on a regular freight engine and most diesel switchers I have seen have top speeds in the 50 mph range.  The challenge is acceleration.  A GP7 has 375 hp/axle.  An E8 has 500 hp/axle.  A typical 1000 hp switcher has only 250 hp/axle.  It can get the train up to 50 mph, but in a commuter territory not before it reaches the next station.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 8, 2007 1:16 PM

The Maryland and Pennsylvania railroad used a EMD switcher as passenger power. There was no need for a steam boiler and the speeds were less than 25 mph anyhow.

They did keep a doodlebug and one steam engine on hand in case the Switcher needed shop work. This arrangement lasted well into the 50's

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Monday, October 8, 2007 1:11 PM
A true yard switcher probably only in an emergency situation.  Switchers tended to have lower gearing and passenger engine required higher gearing for higher top speeds to maintain schedules.  I doubt a true switcher could have run much faster than 30 MPH or so in commuter or passenger service.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Monday, October 8, 2007 11:48 AM

The Reading tried an NW2 as a passenger engine, but it lacked the hp to accelerate fast enough to maintain a schedule.

Baldwin made the RS12, a S12 switcher with a short hood for a steam generator. that was used on many branchline applications.  They ended their days switching the coach yards in Amtrak facilities. An RS12 model is made by Stewart.

It also depends on how you define a "yard switcher" since RS1,2,3 GP7, 9, H24-66's have all been bought/used as yard engines and all have been used in passenger service.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Yard switcher as a passenger locomotive.
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 8, 2007 11:30 AM
Are there any instances of a yard switcher being used as a passenger locomotive?I'm thinking of main or branch line service not a heritage line.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!