Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Best current choice for turnouts and track

1205 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: THE FAR, FAR REACHES OF THE WILD, WILD WEST!
  • 3,672 posts
Posted by R. T. POTEET on Tuesday, April 24, 2007 8:34 PM
 NevinW wrote:

Micro Engineering:  code 70, very good looking.  Downside: no #4 or 5, have heard stories about difficulty with getting the flex track to flex.  



I never used Micro-Engineering track in HO; I have purchased a whole bunch of it in N-Scale and I have never experienced any difficulty with it at all.  On my second N-Scale layout - the first one I used Code 55 on - I had an industrial curve of 8.5 inches -that translates to 15 5/8 inches in HO - that is a very sharp curve. My tightest since then has been 10.5 inches - equivalent to 19¼ inches in HO.  That is just a tad more reasonable, I would say.

And as far as switches go, have you ever heard the term "Do-it-Yourself"?  I figure if I could learn how to program a computer building switches would be a piece of cake.

From the far, far reaches of the wild, wild west I am: rtpoteet

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: ohio
  • 431 posts
Posted by jbloch on Tuesday, April 24, 2007 2:19 PM

For all of the above reasons discussed and comments from multiple other threads, my current plan(always subject to change) is to use Micro Engineering Code 83 flex, and Walthers Code 83 turnouts, which will require shimming under the turnouts(1/32" according to other discussants).  I might, however consider doing Fast Track jig-produced turnouts if I think I can take the time to do them(1 year back in the hobby and haven't even started my benchwork yet!!).

Jim

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 289 posts
Posted by bagal on Tuesday, April 24, 2007 5:39 AM

Peco also available in power routing insulfrog. Unpowered section is quite short but there is a potential short circuit at the frog. Centreing spring means ground throw or turnout motor not required. Expensive.

Walthers Shinohara. All live not power routing. Metal frog can be powered from auxiliary contacts. Unpowered section approx 29mm. If frog powered reduces to about 10mm. good appearance compared to Atlas. Worth the wait.

 

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Amish country Tenn.
  • 10,027 posts
Posted by loathar on Monday, April 23, 2007 6:18 PM

Central Valley-Dead plastic frog. Someone makes a cast metal frog you can use, but they cost as much as the turnout kit. Great looking. Great detail. Pretty EZ to lay. Comes with code 70 and 83 frog and guide rails. All turnouts are curvable.

Drawback-I wouldn't use it if your layout room isn't climate controlled. Rail is glued and/or spiked down. Gluing isn't good for expansion.

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: Colorado
  • 4,075 posts
Posted by fwright on Monday, April 23, 2007 5:01 PM

ME track is also available in code 55.  Code 55 (75 lb rail) would be more appropriate for everything but the main line.  I found the easiest way to curve ME track is to use a template - I cut mine from plywood.  Use the plywood curve as a form, similar to the way tubing is bent.  Cut off the last 1/2 inch or so that you can't bend into a smooth curve.  Nice thing about ME track is that once bent it will hold its shape while you glue it - no need to pin while the glue dries.  Also no need to solder joints on curves, or even use rail joiners if you don't want them.

Turnouts are also available in all sizes and rail codes from Railway Engineering, BK, and others not normally stocked at hobby shops.  See Narrow Gauge and Short Line Gazette for ads from smaller and niche suppliers.

my thoughts, your choices

Fred W

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Monday, April 23, 2007 4:47 PM

You might go with Fast Tracks Jigs for your turnout. From all I've heard, it is impossible to buy a better one. It seems easy enough to do--although I've gotten a jig, I've yet to build my first.

Anyway, you can get them for any track--they make them for ME--I've got a new #4 Jig I'd sell--just kidding, it's a Code 83 ME. I've switched to #5 turnouts.

 

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Nevada
  • 825 posts
Best current choice for turnouts and track
Posted by NevinW on Monday, April 23, 2007 4:07 PM

I am planning my new layout and am trying to decide what type of track to use.  I am modeling pre-WWI so smaller track would be preferable.  Code 70 or smaller would be esthetically ideal.  I use DCC so something DCC friendly or DCC updated would be nice.  Non-power routed would be preferred.  I might consider code 83.  I don't have much time so handlaying track may be impractical.  Looking around the internet I find a number of choices:

Micro Engineering:  code 70, very good looking.  Downside: no #4 or 5, have heard stories about difficulty with getting the flex track to flex.  Opinions about the flex track especially the weathered would be appreciated.  If I had the room for all #6 this would be my first choice. 

Peco: US code 83, nice looking turnouts, but very expensive, has electrofrogs

Shinohara code 70.  Not sure this is DCC friendly yet, old shinohara are all live frogs. Great variety of potential turnout types. 3 way turnouts!   With the exception of a #4 left hand turnout it seems to all be on back order and unavailable.

Walthers code 83.  See Shinohara.  Advertised as DCC friendly, not sure if this means live frog or not.  Are these still power routing?  Great variety, but all on backorder.  Walthers says it is coming back in April.

Central Valley turnout kits.  I can't tell if these are live frog or dead.  At least part of the frog is plastic.  Will take code 70 rail that is glued down in a slot to hold it in gauge.  A variety of options available.  Not sure how sturdy these will be.  Does anyone have experience with these?

Atlas: code 83, easily available.  Lots of track components.  Dead frog, not power routing.  Easily replaceable.  Good price.  Really ugly looking frog.  ? reliability. 

What have I missed here?   Are there other options?  I want something that looks good but doesn't take forever to complete.  Let me know what you are using and what you recommend. - Nevin  

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!