Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Bachman EZ track to Atlas #83 HO

8596 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,892 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Friday, July 14, 2017 4:33 PM

I thought I saw a ghost for a second, and Jeffrey is no longer with use either, RIP.

Freaky seeing threads necro'd with those who are not longer with us.

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    December 2015
  • From: Shenandoah Valley
  • 9,094 posts
Posted by BigDaddy on Friday, July 14, 2017 4:01 PM

jjdamnit
Please clarify... Anonymous The Atlas track is supported by code #83 cork.

Anonymous isn't here anymore, but you knew that.  Howard needs to tell us the height differential between his roadbeds.  And are we talking about EZ track to Atlas true track or Atlas sectional or flex track?

It could probably be handled with styrene shims under the cork (or true track) or just ballast.  This transition needs to extend over several inches for smooth operation.

Maybe I'm an unbeliever but ballast has always looked better to me than plastic roadbed.  Making the two look good together is probably more challenging than transitioning between different heights.

Henry

COB Potomac & Northern

Shenandoah Valley

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • From: 10,430’ (3,179 m)
  • 2,311 posts
Posted by jjdamnit on Friday, July 14, 2017 2:43 PM

-

"Uhh...I didn’t know it was 'impossible' I just made it work...sorry"

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: North Jersey, USA.
  • 114 posts
Posted by Howardr on Thursday, July 13, 2017 5:00 PM

Thanks for the information but what you didn’t mention was how you resolved the height between the EZ track and the Atlas track.  Not the difference between code 100 track and anything else, just the height between roadbeds.  What method and materials did you use to resolve this issue.
 
Thanks
HowardR
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Orig: Tyler Texas. Lived in seven countries, now live in Sundown, Louisiana
  • 25,640 posts
Posted by jeffrey-wimberly on Monday, December 18, 2006 5:57 PM
I know that awhile back. Bachmann made a section that transitioned from EZ track to regular track. I don't know if this is still available. I always made my own by cuttinng the end off a piece of EZ track, trimming the plastic roadbed back and installing joiners to connect to the regular track.

Running Bear, Sundown, Louisiana
          Joined June, 2004

Dr. Frankendiesel aka Scott Running Bear
Space Mouse for president!
15 year veteran fire fighter
Collector of Apple //e's
Running Bear Enterprises
History Channel Club life member.
beatus homo qui invenit sapientiam


  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Monday, December 18, 2006 4:00 PM

<>Bachmann EZ track rail joiners aren't too hard to get out, they're just regular rail joiners. On my old layout I removed some and replaced them with the pre-wired Atlas rail joiners. They're a little stiff but they do come off - if one is being difficult, grab the very end of it with a needlenose pliers.

<>As far as connecting code 83 to code 100, either the rail joiners mentioned or (if it's still available??) Walthers code 83 to code 100 track sections. They're about 3-4 inches long. I used them on my old layout to connect Walthers code 83 to Bachman code 100 EZ track. You might need to shim a little under the track or roadbed to get it level but otherwise it should work fine.

Stix
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Monday, December 18, 2006 12:16 PM

You should use transition joiners in any case, but that means removing the permanent one on each end of the EZ-Track sections.  That is a royal pain where the Sun don't shine.

My experience with transition joiners is that they are a pain all by themselves.  You will find that they slip onto each rail much more easily if you slightly bevel and file thinner the flange on which they slide.  Otherwise, you end up forcing them to fold and slice into your finger.  Not fun.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Bachman EZ track to Atlas #83 HO
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, December 18, 2006 10:13 AM

Hello ,

is there a simple way that can be used to combine these two track types together? The Atlas track is supported by code #83 cork. Confused [%-)]

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!