Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Bench work shape

3812 views
1 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:01 PM
I agree that looking at benchwork designs that fit your area is a good early exercise. I think you also have to consider what you want to accomplish in the way of your layout, sort of a list of givens and druthers as John Armstrong says. For my current layout I have a space 11'3" x18'8". I drew up plans in HO, O, and S. In HO I used the multiple blob approach that John Armstrong used in his book "Creative Layout Design". This resulted in complex, complicated layout layout that looked like I would never get reasonably finished or like. I then went with a more simple around the wall mainline with center branch in O scale, this was influenced by Jeff Madden's article "Come and Go Layout Design". I liked the bench work design of the around the walls 18" deep with a 3'6" x 12" center island, but realized that in O scale the trains would be shorter than I wanted and the center branchline would not amount to much. So I shifted to S scale and double tracked the mainline with staging tracks on one side to be senically a station and an interchange on the other side. The branchline in the center will be narrow gauge. This will enable me to run long trains on the outside while operating short narrow gauge trains in the middle. Best of all, all parts of the layout are less than 2 feet from an edge. This really makes working on the layout easy.
Enjoy
Paul
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:01 PM
I agree that looking at benchwork designs that fit your area is a good early exercise. I think you also have to consider what you want to accomplish in the way of your layout, sort of a list of givens and druthers as John Armstrong says. For my current layout I have a space 11'3" x18'8". I drew up plans in HO, O, and S. In HO I used the multiple blob approach that John Armstrong used in his book "Creative Layout Design". This resulted in complex, complicated layout layout that looked like I would never get reasonably finished or like. I then went with a more simple around the wall mainline with center branch in O scale, this was influenced by Jeff Madden's article "Come and Go Layout Design". I liked the bench work design of the around the walls 18" deep with a 3'6" x 12" center island, but realized that in O scale the trains would be shorter than I wanted and the center branchline would not amount to much. So I shifted to S scale and double tracked the mainline with staging tracks on one side to be senically a station and an interchange on the other side. The branchline in the center will be narrow gauge. This will enable me to run long trains on the outside while operating short narrow gauge trains in the middle. Best of all, all parts of the layout are less than 2 feet from an edge. This really makes working on the layout easy.
Enjoy
Paul
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Bench work shape
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 17, 2003 11:53 AM
There are many ways to plan a layout. One that I suggest is that you spend way more time looking at alternate benchwork designs that will fit into the area you are working with, then worry about the track after.

Needless to say, if you are deciding on benchwork, you are also deciding on a basic mainline. So worry about the benchwork shape/mainline , and the style of layout you are going to have, then add the further details latter.

In a room 7 by 13, I first did a rectangular layout design - water wings shaped. I didn't like this and moved on to an around the room design. I preferred a walk in style of layout so I moved to a letter "G" shaped layout. I decided this didn't give me the empire I wanted so I moved to a double decker letter "G" layout. It took me about 7 major benchwork/basic mainline designs before I settled on the look and style I wanted.

Once I had made my basic decision as to the style of layout and shape of the benchwork, I then built it while looking in MR for sections of other people's layouts that would help me in building mine. I found one section I thought would work. I modified it and laid the track for it. This taught me what fit where and I was able to move on to the next section with more experience and better sense of what I wanted. I just kept this up as I went around the layout.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Bench work shape
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 17, 2003 11:53 AM
There are many ways to plan a layout. One that I suggest is that you spend way more time looking at alternate benchwork designs that will fit into the area you are working with, then worry about the track after.

Needless to say, if you are deciding on benchwork, you are also deciding on a basic mainline. So worry about the benchwork shape/mainline , and the style of layout you are going to have, then add the further details latter.

In a room 7 by 13, I first did a rectangular layout design - water wings shaped. I didn't like this and moved on to an around the room design. I preferred a walk in style of layout so I moved to a letter "G" shaped layout. I decided this didn't give me the empire I wanted so I moved to a double decker letter "G" layout. It took me about 7 major benchwork/basic mainline designs before I settled on the look and style I wanted.

Once I had made my basic decision as to the style of layout and shape of the benchwork, I then built it while looking in MR for sections of other people's layouts that would help me in building mine. I found one section I thought would work. I modified it and laid the track for it. This taught me what fit where and I was able to move on to the next section with more experience and better sense of what I wanted. I just kept this up as I went around the layout.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!