Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Yard Questions

1702 views
12 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Holland MI
  • 624 posts
Posted by CSXFan on Monday, June 19, 2006 12:21 PM
Thanks tomikawa,
I just figured we were talking N scale since that's what southernman is modeling, my mistake [:D]
If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space...Wink
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Monday, June 19, 2006 12:16 PM
The Tomikawa Tani Tetsudo (Richstream Valley Railroad) is HOj, 1/80 scale 16.5mm gauge (or twice-N scale).

I was speaking only of available HO products. Since N scalers can buy #5 switches, you have a considerable advantage when designing yards.

A compound ladder using #5 turnouts should really shorten a yard throat!

Chuck
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: In the State of insanity!
  • 7,982 posts
Posted by pcarrell on Monday, June 19, 2006 11:57 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by CSXFan

QUOTE: Originally posted by tomikawaTT
It's too bad that nobody offers preassembled #5 switches. I've found that to be very satisfactory for crossovers, yard leads and even double slip switches. #4 switches, especially in yard ladders, can lead to s-curve problems with more modern cars.


Maybe I don't understand but doesn't Atlas make a #5 switch?

Something like this,



I could be wrong, but I think tomikawaTT is in HO scale.
Philip
  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Holland MI
  • 624 posts
Posted by CSXFan on Monday, June 19, 2006 11:48 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tomikawaTT
It's too bad that nobody offers preassembled #5 switches. I've found that to be very satisfactory for crossovers, yard leads and even double slip switches. #4 switches, especially in yard ladders, can lead to s-curve problems with more modern cars.


Maybe I don't understand but doesn't Atlas make a #5 switch?

Something like this,

If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space...Wink
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • 535 posts
Posted by nucat78 on Monday, June 19, 2006 11:02 AM
I am building an L-shaped N-scale switching layout also.

I'm using Peco #6 switches (what they call medium) and have had no trouble backing a C30-7 and 50-foot cars through the ladder and onto the spurs. My old Concor 80-foot autoracks cannot handle being pushed through the #6s, but I'll probably sell them as I have no use for them with this layout. I'd like to use #8s (what they call long) because they really are a thing of beauty, but they'd chew up too much of my available space.

I'm using Woodland Scenics foam roadbed sheets for the yard as I think the WS product is a bit quieter than cork.

I use a Rix pick to uncouple, so I'm not installing magnets.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 19, 2006 9:31 AM
#2 I use roadbed in my yards. It matches my mainline.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Sunday, June 18, 2006 1:34 PM
It's too bad that nobody offers preassembled #5 switches. I've found that to be very satisfactory for crossovers, yard leads and even double slip switches. #4 switches, especially in yard ladders, can lead to s-curve problems with more modern cars.

There is a solution which allows the use of longer turnouts, yet shortens the total length of the ladder (and thereby lengthens the yard tracks) for yards with six or more parallel tracks. Use a compound ladder, which ends up with a ladder angle equivalent to #3 when built with #6 turnouts. It is also possible to incorporate a slight curve beyond the points, ending up with a #4 ladder angle when done with #6 turnouts. Both compound and extra-curve designs will require some creative trimming of commercial turnouts, and both pretty much preclude use of above-the-table switch machines.

Chuck (who hand builds all of his specialwork)
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Riverside,Ca.
  • 1,127 posts
Posted by spidge on Sunday, June 18, 2006 11:00 AM
As tempting as it is for the #4's please don't, you may never run the yard as the pushing of cars into the spurs will cause some derailment. The #4's are ok for short cuts but more than a few cars per cut will be a real bummer to watch.

I am debating where to put the uncoupler too. I would like to have only one at the yard lead but what if I want only one ot two cars off a cut of cars in the sidding? I would have to pull them all out do the delay thing and pu***hem back, this could be a long movement the yard cannot aford. The yard dictates the pace of an ops session so the more time saved in the yard the more enjoyable for everyone. I think I just talked myself into magnets on each lead.

Sheet cork or none at all, if you don't run fast over the yard track then there would not be a sound problem. I like to use the cork because I can do things below the tracks for scenery.

John

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Kansas
  • 808 posts
Posted by jamnest on Sunday, June 18, 2006 8:30 AM
I agree with Tom on using the cork sheets for yard roadbed. You can purchase them at Lowes, HomeDepot, Meneards or your local lumber company. The cork sheets give you a lower profile for yard tacks.

As for yard turnouts I would suggest you go with #6 turnouts (switches) as a minimum unles you are going to operate only 40' or 50' cars. Your #4 turnouts may also cause problems if your locomotive is pushing long cuts of cars through the turnout. Yes you will have a much longer yard ladder with #6 turnouts, but more reliable opeeration in the long run.

I do not use uncoupling ramps in my layout. The yard crew used a had heald uncoupler. I model in HO scale and I am not sure if this is practical in Nscale due to the smaller size.

Jim

Jim, Modeling the Kansas City Southern Lines in HO scale.

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Jarrell, Texas
  • 1,114 posts
Posted by Tom Bryant_MR on Sunday, June 18, 2006 8:03 AM
I'm laying cork sheet for my staging yard. Another recommendation I've had from others is to put a re-railler in each yard leg.



Tom

  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Ulster Co. NY
  • 1,464 posts
Posted by larak on Saturday, June 17, 2006 11:44 PM
John Armstrong suggested electro magnetic uncouplers on each end of through tracks (sidings) and permanent magnets the the beginning of each spur.

Disclaimer: I plan to build my yard that way but I have not gotten there yet. I want to get all of the main lines done first.

I have put rare earth magent pairs at the beginnings of several industiral spurs and four main line sidings and they seem to work fine there. This is in HO. N might behave differently.

The mind is like a parachute. It works better when it's open.  www.stremy.net

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Saturday, June 17, 2006 10:42 PM
1. Depends on your engines. I run very small steam and I can do #4s no problem. Don't try it with a Big Boy.

2. Some do some don't. Sound is an issue as is track height. Some people will lay out a sheet of cork for the entire yard.

3. I've not placed uncouplers on my yard yet--haven't gotten that far. Most drawings I've seen place one delayed uncoupler at the top of the yard track and you pu***he car into place.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • 50 posts
Yard Questions
Posted by southernman on Saturday, June 17, 2006 10:04 PM
Howdy all, I am at the age ofn 33 finally building a layout & have opted for N scale, set on the railway I watched growing up in Marion, North Carolina, the Southern Railway.

I have a medium sized yard, and am using Peco code 80 track

I DO have limited space (L shaped plan, basically a switching plan surrounded by parrallel main lines

My questions

1. Can I get away with small #4 turnouts in the yard, or am I asking for trouble? Is #6 the safest?

2. Do you reccomend roadbed in yards? Some seem to forego Roadbed.

3. What is optimal uncoupler placement? How many? 1 on each spur? Or 1 at the yard head?

Thanks loads guys

Lee

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!