QUOTE: Originally posted by jeffrey-wimberly I have my three barrel locks on the underside of the layout so I can crawl under, slide the locks open and gently drop the panel out and set it aside. I then have the problem of getting 235 pound body through the opening. I am permanently disabled and can't walk well so squating and bending is a bit of a chore, but I manage by having gate handles on the underside of the layout that I can pull myself up with. Lot's easier. I'm going to do the same with other other hole. I originally built the layout about 8 or 9 years ago, when I could walk without a problem. Installing casters on the is not an option because it's located in a 25 foot trailer that I live in. There's no room for it to move anywhere. Also, it's bolted to the walls, sure simplified the benchwork.
Dr. Frankendiesel aka Scott Running BearSpace Mouse for president!15 year veteran fire fighterCollector of Apple //e'sRunning Bear EnterprisesHistory Channel Club life member.beatus homo qui invenit sapientiam
QUOTE: Originally posted by jeffrey-wimberly Abuelo; I have a layout that's 7'8" wide, 10' long on the left side and 6'5" on the right side. I knew there would be times when I would have to get to the far side so I made two holes I could come up through. The one on the left side is 2'6" x 2'6" and is a lift out portion. The hole on the right side is 1'9" x 2'7" and is a drop out portion. The lift out panel is supported by 3 peices of 2x4 along the sides. The portion on the right is held in place underneath by 3 sliding locks, barrel locks I think they're called. This makes it fairly easy to get to where I need to be without sacrificing space for walk through areas.
QUOTE: I had thought of the access holes idea but I'm getting up there and would probably get stuck under there and not be able to get out again. My knees don't bend so good anymore :) I do very much like the idea of a U shape, but then I come up with the question that followed. How much room do I need to make a turnabout for the tracks to come back around again?
QUOTE: Originally posted by Abuelo I wasn't too sure what Texas Zepher and CSX fan meant by a 18" curve. ??
QUOTE: I come up with the question that followed. How much room do I need to make a turnabout for the tracks to come back around again?
QUOTE: I am a fan of AT&SF,BN,GN, and BNSF so I will be using locos that are that size and the longest car would be a AT&SF passenger car.
QUOTE: Originally posted by gderem An around the wall design might be better -- you could be more flexible for your size too....8x8; 8x12; 8x16; 8x30
QUOTE: Originally posted by jbloch Abuelo: Welcome! I'm also a newbie, have followed the forums for a couple of months and have several of the Kalmbach books, so I can give you a summary answer to your question. The book you're referring to is Linn Wescott"s 101 Track Plans--I actually plan on modifying one of the plans for my layout. Distance from the edge of the table is important; there are a couple plans in Wescott's book that would have longest access to the center of the table/layout greater than 3 feet, but most are at or less that three feet. This has come up on another thread: one experienced modeler reccommends usually avoiding reaches greater than 24 inches and at the most 30 inches. I plan on doing a 6 X 12 foot table, which would involve a 36 inch max. reach, but as the only track that I'll have close in that area is a connecting/reverse loop, I plan on doing that. Height of your table also makes a difference--if your table is taller, you'll not be able to reach as far. To really answer your question, you're probably going to have trouble reaching the inside areas on a 8 X 8 plan. If you want to do it in that area, considerations would be to leave an end open (i.e. in a U shape) or put an access hatch in the middle. Some have felt that Wescott's book is a bit dated; having been out of the hobby for a long time I found it helpful and it can give you a lot of ideas even if you don't use any of his plans completely. gderem mentions another alternative-there are many! I wanted a table top format and the ability to run loops in addition to connecting to sides on the inside. In addition, I want broad curves (doubt I'll ever want to have a 2-8-8-2) but want the flexiblity for longer locos, passenger cars, etc. in the future if I decide that's what I want. So I'd recc. you get Westcott's book along with some others to give you a variety of ideas. Good luck! Jim
Glenn -- PRR in Georgia