Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Benchwork

9422 views
37 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • 125 posts
Posted by abbieleibowitz on Saturday, March 18, 2006 4:31 PM
I have tried it both ways and found that it makes very little difference. Logically, it seems that the legs spacing should depend on the span. On an 8 foot table or girder, It is hard to leave more than 4 feet unsupported and not anticipate some sag. So the rationale for putting the legs 2 feet from the end of the girder or frame is to leave a reasonable span in the middle between legs.
Abbie

Lefty

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Christchurch New Zealand
  • 1,525 posts
Posted by NZRMac on Saturday, March 18, 2006 1:23 PM
I'll throw my pic in here for good luck!!



this is the lower level.

Ken.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 17, 2006 1:59 PM
Hi Mike (South Massey) I'm also building a frame ontop of a bench which is a waste of wood to some but sure will be a snap to move the layout without tearing down the bench to do it. I bought the cheapo pine studs which were quite inexpensive so it did'nt cost me that much more for the table that holds the grids. With the grids it will be extremely easy to add on to or move one that you want elsewhere with a turn of a nut. The foam will be sectioned off to enable any move with only slight damage to the upper scenery layer. Worked for me before. Last time I did put the legs at the corners though and now am convinced that inseting will be the way to go. Bravo Mike!
Jerry
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Finger Lakes
  • 561 posts
Posted by TBat55 on Friday, March 17, 2006 5:44 AM
My 2 cents:

Take a close look at Brunton's photo. I think the big question is if you want a FASCIA that is not perfectly STRAIGHT (just cut the top pieces shorter).

Also since many people try to get the largest radius curves they can, TRACK is often CLOSE TO THE EDGE of the benchwork. You don't want legs or beams underneath the track because of power feeders, turnout machines, etc.

Last, if you plan to PAINT the benchwork then the minimal amount of wood used is important.

My advice: recess the legs as shown (at 1/4 to 1/3 the width).

Terry

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 16, 2006 9:32 AM
Try reading a series of articles by Don Spiros in Model Railroad Craftsman. The articles have run fairly recently -- sometime in 2005. I'm not sure about the exact issues. He described using double width shelving braces -- the kind that screw to the wall studs. FINALLY -- it made building benchwork a possible and feasible project for me. It streamlines everything greatly.

Doesn't sound strong enough for a layout? The shelving is rated to hold 400lbs. I doubt anyone's trains weigh that much :)

I finished benchwork for a layout that runs about 150 sq. feet and the shelving system works great.

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,392 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Thursday, March 16, 2006 8:20 AM
Actually, from reading Westcott's comments on L-girder, he developed it to minimize the amount of wood required for the bench work, and to eliminate the need for precision cuts to fit the pieces together. The pictures people have posted here are mainly grid construction, or a combination of grid and L-girder.

My benchwork on my lower deck is "classic" L-girder:


The table in the foreground is very sturdy, and uses a minimum of lumber. The L-girders are about 1/4 of the way in from the ends of the joists on each side, roughly the optimum location for load-carrying capacity while minimizing deflections in the joists. The table is very light, very strong and very stable. I don't have axial braces on the legs shown because I have them on the end legs out of view to the left.

Where benchwork thickness is an issue on my second deck, I'll use standard grid construction.
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Jarrell, Texas
  • 1,114 posts
Posted by Tom Bryant_MR on Thursday, March 16, 2006 7:09 AM
Maybe we need to understand the primary purpose of the L-girder design. It's primary strength (no pun intended) is to span relatively large distances of up to 20 ft with minimal leg support.

Since most of us are not construction experts and with the volumes being written on RR benchwork, it is no doubt why this particular technique is being choosen.

Tom

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Jarrell, Texas
  • 1,114 posts
Posted by Tom Bryant_MR on Thursday, March 16, 2006 6:36 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Surfstud31

Tom - that is how much of my new benchwork will be. In the along the wall sections I will run 2x3 from edge of layout to where floor meets wall. This keeps legs out of your way and should provide plenty of strength. I just finished cleaning up the room and now I am prepping it with a light coat of blue paint on the walls (for sky) and super-white on the ceiling for good light reflection. Should have it painted and ready for benchwork this weekend. Getting psyched, it's been 12 years since my last layout and I miss my trains dearly.


Depending on your trig math skills and/or access to a calculator, I found the following invaluable for calculating those angles needed for cutting the cantalevers.

You do mean 1x3 right?

http://id.mind.net/~zona/mmts/trigonometryRealms/solvers/rtTriSolvers/rtTriSolversHome.htm

Good luck.
-Tom B

Tom

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 6:14 PM
See this is why I think L-Girder is just a waste of wood, especially for a flat-top layout. You could have bolted the legs to the 'table' section and it would have been plenty sturdy and every bit as portable - just unbolt the legs and you'd have the exact same table piece to carry around that you will anyway. You essentially built two tables and stacked them on top of one another.

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Spanaway, WA
  • 787 posts
Posted by SMassey on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 3:52 PM
Here is an example of of my benchwork. It is L girder design 3' x 6' with a 4' x8' table on top.



Here is the bench with the table on top just no plywood yet.



I built my benchwork to be portable. If you notice the bolts holding the legs to the frame and shelf on the bottom and also I have 4 bolts holding the table to the bench. I did this so I could take the layout to shows or just incase of a future move. Other than that I used drywall screws to assemble the rest of the benchwork and table top.

A Veteran, whether active duty, retired, national guard, or reserve, is someone who, at one point in his or her life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America" for an amount of "up to and including my life."

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 11:01 AM
QUOTE: originally posted by Surfstud31
...Getting psyched, it's been 12 years since my last layout and I miss my trains dearly.


Don't get too excited or too tired, that's when mistakes happen. [:(!] [censored] [banghead]
Work safely and keep a first aid kit handy. [B)]
Good luck!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 10:32 AM
Tom - that is how much of my new benchwork will be. In the along the wall sections I will run 2x3 from edge of layout to where floor meets wall. This keeps legs out of your way and should provide plenty of strength. I just finished cleaning up the room and now I am prepping it with a light coat of blue paint on the walls (for sky) and super-white on the ceiling for good light reflection. Should have it painted and ready for benchwork this weekend. Getting psyched, it's been 12 years since my last layout and I miss my trains dearly.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 406 posts
Posted by donhalshanks on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 10:06 AM
I also followed Wescott's L-girder construction to a tee, and have been very satisfied. Really easy to install risers and roadbed. Can have curved fronts on the layout. Found it stable. I felt it maximized the use of wood effectively. I can see that future changes or modifications very possible.

Hal
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Jarrell, Texas
  • 1,114 posts
Posted by Tom Bryant_MR on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 6:54 AM
Depending on your situation, here is another technique for legs. Advantages are obvious.

I finally got started on my benchwork, courtesy of Don Z. Mine is an around the walls in the garage. I am going to use a mix of contruction techniques as each has it's pro's and con's. I'm using two of the walls, so benchwork in those areas will be attached and cantalevered as in this picture. I have one large free standing island and a section along the garage door (to which I cannot obviously attach to) that will require a different constuction technique than shown here.

BTW. I spent a few hours with Don Z the other day. He built the sections you see here along with two more identical ones for the upper deck. Those pocket hole joints disussed in another thread are really strong. The jig from Kreg is worth every penny if you are building a large layout. I got one and did the cantalever supports myself. With the jig it is a snap. Hats off to Don Z [^]

Look Ma ... no legs [:)] ... well, okay one, but it gets wacked soon.


Tom

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 6:50 AM
I think stability against shaking or rocking are far more important than the ability to stand on the layout. Seeing as how my sections are only 2' wide, I can easily reach anything above the layout without actually standing on it. My legs are probably overkill - 2x3's because Home Depot around here doesn't carry 2x2's (except pressure treated short ones intended for deck railings) and I don't have a table saw to rip down 2x4's. And 2x3's are cheap - I didn't get high quality ones, just studs. I picked the best ones, but they certainly aren't all perfect. Each leg is braced with 1x2's in two directions to the grid. And the legs were attached first with clamps so I could level everything up before screwing them on - my legs are all bolted to the grid, as are the diagonal braces. It's all quite stable, nothing moves when I lean against or try to shake the layout. In my book that makes it plenty good for building a layout on top of.

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 1:32 AM
One thing no one has mentioned about pure L girder construction is that the edge of the layout doesn't have to be a straight line. By cutting the joist ends to appropriate lengths, the fascia can be bent to represent, for example, the bank of a meandering stream.

I didn't quite do that, but i did cut my peninsula corners at 45 degrees, which reduced the 'running into a sharp corner' incidents to zero. As an added bonus, I gained a couple of nice places to mount control panels.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 11:11 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by MisterBeasley

......then pile of my wife's big, heavy ..


Oh man, I thought I read "big, heavy" something else.

Sorry Mr.B, it's past my bed time.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 11:03 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by rrinker

I can't believe how useful latex cauk is in building a layout. I could probably glue the foam to the wood benchwork with it even, guess I'll have to try that next.

--Randy


That's what I do. A bead of caulk on the rafters, then the foam, then a pile of my wife's big, heavy art books. (Note: remove the art books before putting down the roadbed.)

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 11:02 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by horailfan

...should I follow Westcotts advice and move the legs in (basicly a table below the gridwork )or just install them at the corners attaching them directly to the grids?


Should you attach the legs at the corners? In my opinion, no. Attaching the legs to the corners increases the chances of creating scale earthquakes from the legs being kicked by you and/or guest . And it isn't as good for supporting weight as moving them inward.

Should you set the legs below the grid? No, not quite. Rather than set the grid on top of L-girders with legs, attach the legs to the grid as Westcott suggest by locating them to minimize sag and tilt and thereby maximizing load bearing properties.
You could use L-girders under the grid and attach them to the legs AND to the bottom of the grid. That would add bracing to the legs near the top at the attaching point to the grid. it's most important to properly brace the legs for stability.

QUOTE: ..The last layout I built I did put them at the corners but also had a 2x4 running down the middle of a 4x8 section and then attached a 4x6 creating an L (this layout was also grid construction with plywood on top) somewhat of an overkill with all of the 2x4 bracing, I could of danced on that benchwork...


In the first sentence on page thirty five, Westcott says that "An average model railroad layout weighs about two pounds pre square foot."
But it should be able to support a beer gut shoving it from the side and top while working on the layout.
Again, I.M.O., it is not the table top that needs reinforcement, it's the legs. If you want to go crazy with the lumber, concentrate on bracing the legs. Make them as ridged as possible.

And if you have a gut the size of a Sumo wrestler maybe you should bolt the legs to the floor or the table to the wall to prevent shoving the layout around the room.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:51 PM
Actually, I went downstairs tonight to check out a few things, and now that it's beena few weeks since I glued the Tortoise under the foam with calk - it's solid as can be. No way if the force of the spring wire going to move it. I think I found a new way to proceed - skip cutting the square, skip making squares of perf board, just drill a whole and caulk the Tortoise underneath, pretty much the same as with plywood. In fact you probably could use the caulk to mount the Tortoise on plywood and skip the screws. There's a good half hour of working time to get it aligned, then let the caulk set up for 24-48 hours, and off you go.
I can't believe how useful latex cauk is in building a layout. I could probably glue the foam to the wood benchwork with it even, guess I'll have to try that next.

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 4:43 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ereimer

...I was thinking of just glueing a 4"x4" piece of 1/4" plywood to the bottom of the foam then screwing a tortoise to that . could probably go with a smaller piece of plywood if space is tight , or a larger piece if 2 tortoises are close to each other . i'd love to hear pro and con arguements about this before i start construction (maybe this summer)


Con (well, more con than pro)
For the base for my roundhouse and turntable I used a 4' X 4' X 1/4" outdoor plywood under a 4' X 4' x 2" extruded foam.
As soon as I applied the glue to the plywood, it warped, a lot. I used all the heavy weights I could find, on top of another sheet of plywood, on top of the foam (just to protect the foam from dents).
After the glue set, It came out somewhat flat, but not perfectaly flat as I wanted. The warping did give me a bit of trouble with fitting the rear walls to the base of the roundhouse. But consider that the roundhouse spans across the whole 4 x 4 section and I shoot for perfection (however, I often miss the bulls eye). Maybe a sag or bow of 1/16" - 1/8" won't be a problem for you though.




  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 4:35 PM
Well I mounted my Tortoises from the top through the foam. But I'm in the midst of an experiment to just glue them onthe bottom with the same latex caulk I used for everything else. So far, it seems stable. The Tortoise held on by itself while the caulk was drying. Next step is to see how easily it peels off, which I suspect will be quite easy. Then I need to put it in place where it operates an actual turnout and see if it withstands the sideways force of the operating wire. If this works it will make things even easier, no messy squares to cut in the foam and still no plywood required.

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: CANADA
  • 2,292 posts
Posted by ereimer on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 4:12 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Surfstud31

Ah ha! Jack, I think you hit what I wanted to know. If I am going to be mounting under the table slow-mo machines, etc, I want that 1/4" plywood base for mounting stuff to. That makes alot of sense. Then a 2" layer of foam on top of plywood. Then I will use Woodland Scenics roadbed or AMI. It's all coming together now. Thanx gang for all the great input!


i was thinking of just glueing a 4"x4" piece of 1/4" plywood to the bottom of the foam then screwing a tortoise to that . could probably go with a smaller piece of plywood if space is tight , or a larger piece if 2 tortoises are close to each other . i'd love to hear pro and con arguements about this before i start construction (maybe this summer)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 4:08 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by horailfan

...I've been reading How to Build Model Railroad bencwork by Linn Westcott. He recommends moving the legs in away from the edges of the layout and using L girders for the base of the layout above for more stability...


Don't overlook the part about tilt and sag. Moving the legs (ideally) at 1/5 and at 4/5 the distance of the girder, not only adds to stability but also increases load bearing by reducing sag and tilt. See figure 1 on page 35.

Consider too that you will have an amount of toe space related to the overhang of the joist. See figure 4-9, page 30
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 12:07 PM
Ah ha! Jack, I think you hit what I wanted to know. If I am going to be mounting under the table slow-mo machines, etc, I want that 1/4" plywood base for mounting stuff to. That makes alot of sense. Then a 2" layer of foam on top of plywood. Then I will use Woodland Scenics roadbed or AMI. It's all coming together now. Thanx gang for all the great input!
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 199 posts
Posted by jhugart on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:44 AM
When you have your legs inset from the actual edge of the layout, you are less likely to kick the legs when you are working on the layout, and it is easier to hide the legs with a curtain. The ultimate of this is a walk-in layout where you have brackets connected to the wall, so there are no legs whatsoever.

On the other hand, if you decide to build straight down, you could incorporate shelves or something right there.

Remember, though, that even kitchen cabinets have a toe-space so you can stand as close as you tend to do without stubbing your toes.
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Southern Colorado
  • 752 posts
Posted by jxtrrx on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:41 AM
I had a small section of foam with no plywood under and experienced lots of reverberation noise as trains rolled into the "foam only" area. The difference in mine and what Randy decribes is mine was only 1" foam. I bet that's the root of the noise problem. (Thicker maybe reverbs less).
-Jack My shareware model railroad inventory software: http://www.yardofficesoftware.com My layout photos: http://s8.photobucket.com/albums/a33/jxtrrx/JacksLayout/
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 6:11 AM
I don't lay track directly on the foam, I used the Woodland Scenics foam roadbed. All 'glued' with latex caulk. I don't have a noise problem. While othr combinations might well be quieter, the predominate sound I hear when runnign trains is the swish of the metal wheels on the rail, NOT any kind of out of place drumming sound from the foam. I'm not sure what I've done differently than the people who have complained of the noise. Could be the caulk adhesive, or having supports 16" OC (the foam would support itself over a wider span, 2' for sure - so I COULD use less wood), or the partcular variation of foam I use. The local Home Depot only sells Owens-COrning (pink) Foamular 250, which is the middle grade as far as strength (and probaly thus density) goes. Some places may get the Foamular 150 or the heavier 400/600/1000 line (very strong and designed to go against or under concrete forms). The Foamular 1000 has a 100PSI supprot strenth - unless you were wearing spikes you could certainly stand on that. I have no idea how much something like that costs, probably much more than good grade plywood, whereas the common Foamular 250 is less expensive.

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 1:29 AM
The only reason to use plywood under 2 inch foam is what jxtrrx said, to give something to attach to. The whole concept of L-girder construction is that all the screws go from the bottom up. Foam doesn't hold screws worth a darn!

The plywood doesn't have to be thick under 2" foam, just thick enough to hold screws. Also makes mounting switch machines below the roadbed a lot easier.

My own benchwork is L girder type, but built with steel studs. Subroadbed is laminated thin plywood reinforced with steel. (Dessication does strange things to wood, so keeping plywood flat is an issue, even with only 16 inch spans.) What foam I do use is 1/4 inch fan-fold underlayment, used where most folks use cork (another material which doesn't react well to high heat and zero humidity).

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!