Login
or
Register
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Home
»
Model Railroader
»
Forums
»
Layouts and layout building
»
Tech 4 200 or Tech 4 260?
Tech 4 200 or Tech 4 260?
760 views
4 replies
Order Ascending
Order Descending
Medina1128
Member since
April 2003
From: Clinton, MO, US
4,261 posts
Posted by
Medina1128
on Thursday, August 18, 2005 5:42 AM
I have bought an MRC 2500 AND a Tech4 260 online through eBay. The momentum function didn't work on the 2500, and I was able to return to the people I bought it from with a FULL refund. eBaying can be fun. Just check the feedback on the seller from various buyers. I've NEVER had an unpleasant eBay experience. All that being said, buy the one with 1) more power, and 2) more features. Believe me, you'll wish you had. Another thing to consider, although you said you'd only be running one train at a time, will you be running trains with multi-locomotive lashups? The extra power will come in handy when you're lugging those coal hoppers uphill. [:)]
Marlon
See pictures of the Clinton-Golden Valley RR
Reply
dgwinup
Member since
May 2005
1,168 posts
Posted by
dgwinup
on Thursday, August 18, 2005 2:04 AM
Hi, prizm76,
If you don't have to buy new, look at online auctions for MRC 2500. They have plenty of power for what you want, and have momentum and braking features (use them or not, it works well either way).
Cacole is correct about the multiple feeders, though. With common rail wiring, each block gets it's own power input, but the common rail all too often is wired at one location only. Make sure you use multiple common rail feed wires.
If you buy used, but from someone reputable or who has a return policy. If you buy at auction, read the ENTIRE description and ask the seller questions if you are not certain. Auction buying can be fun, but it is strictly "Let the buyer beware!"
Of course, if you just must have new, then "never mind"...
Good luck with you railroad.
Darrell, being quiet.....for now
Darrell, quiet...for now
Reply
davekelly
Member since
December 2003
From: Rhode Island
2,216 posts
Posted by
davekelly
on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 3:40 PM
The other thing to consider is that the 260 has momentum and braking, the 200 doesn't. If these features are important to you then go for the 260, if not, the 200 should work just fine.
If you ain't having fun, you're not doing it right and if you are having fun, don't let anyone tell you you're doing it wrong.
Reply
cacole
Member since
July 2003
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
13,757 posts
Posted by
cacole
on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 3:20 PM
17Va and 20Va is equivalent to saying 17 Watts output and 20 Watts output. For what you intend to run, the smaller should be just fine. What you will need are multiple power feeds to your track so you don't have dead spots or low voltage when the train gets to its furthest point from the power pack.
Reply
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Tech 4 200 or Tech 4 260?
Posted by
Anonymous
on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 3:13 PM
I need an opinion on this one, I have 5 4x8 tables with a basic loop around the outside and want to create to small yards with 3 sidings in each. There will only ever be one train running on the track at a time.
Do I need the extra power of the tech 260? It's 20 dollars more than the 200 and I don't want to buy it if it will have no discernable effect. If it improves overall electrical performance on the layout I'll do it.
The 200 has 17Va
The 260 has 20Va
Reply
Edit
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Users Online
There are no community member online
Search the Community
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter
See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter
and get model railroad news in your inbox!
Sign up