Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Yard Roast--Draft 4--Don't like it as much

6516 views
31 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,248 posts
Yard Roast--Draft 4--Don't like it as much
Posted by SpaceMouse on Wednesday, August 3, 2005 6:06 PM
Well this is my thoughts for my yard. It a combination minor interchange and classification yard. There will be plenty of throught freights. In the upper right you see two tracks. The connected track goes via tunnel to the California Western Branch line. The stubbed line is the main coming from San Francisco Staging.

In the upper right of the yard is the main line going to Eureka.

The horizontal blue line is a back drop. The vertical blue line is a seam in the landscape mesh.

In theory, if you look ant the right side of the main-line you have a classification yard. On the left side of the yard is a place where motive power can be switched without pulling into the yard, or a car of two can be dropped for local or set out for the through freights. This yard is at about the center of the Northwestern Pacific being 170 miles from SF and 130 from Eureka. The year is 1917. Logging is the major industry in the area.

What I don't like.

IT doesn't feel complete. The caboose track is near the edge, but that can be fixed. A pole goes through the one of the tracks on the town side of the backdrop. The passenger station I have located in the small siding at the top of the drawing. The spur off the back is for passenger car storage. It is just too cramped. Approx size of what is shown 5' x 14' HO scale.

I am open to any and all sugestions.

[getting into asbestos suit]

FLAME ON!

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, August 3, 2005 10:01 PM
Hmm, looks pretty good to me. Look like you have all the pieces, A/D track, access to the servicing facilities, switcher pocket, caboose track.. Maybe if you angled the yard a bit and lopped off the lower right corner of the benchwork at a similar angle so you can still reach in. Does the town need to be seperated by a backdrop? That would open things up a bit more - instead of a solid backdrop divider, how about the actual town - streets, buildings, houses, etc.?

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,248 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Wednesday, August 3, 2005 10:13 PM
The backdrop right now forms the base for the upper level. I suppose I could suspend it. In the proto there is no horseshoe bend in the track obviously, but I like the idea. I'd have to build lots of structures though. Can't think of a better way to drive the cost per foot. I will think about it. I haven't put in any industrial spurs yet.

Oh yeah, I intended a crossover on the right side of the two lower AD tracks.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 3, 2005 10:25 PM
Chip, connect the inside track to the yard ladder somehow and you will be able to make double moves in the yard.

IE: A train will be able to depart from the bottom track (Where the cabii track is) while your yard crew keeps drilling cars.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,616 posts
Posted by dehusman on Wednesday, August 3, 2005 11:22 PM
No flames, just suggestions.

I would suggest not having the the engine facilities break off the class tracks. I would put the engine terminal inside the loop. You might even want to reverse the lead and put it on the bottom with the class tracks parallel to the mains.

I also don't understand the runaround on the bottom class track or the double crossover at the top.

I am not connected to a printer so I will have to study it some more and make additional comments later. I am looking at ho you will get a cut to switch or an outbound train from the class yard to one of the long tracks.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: AIKEN S.C. & Orange Park Fl.
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by claycts on Wednesday, August 3, 2005 11:30 PM
Looks a LOT better than what I have. I need to read the book again!!
Take Care George Pavlisko Driving Race cars and working on HO trains More fun than I can stand!!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Clinton, MO, US
  • 4,261 posts
Posted by Medina1128 on Thursday, August 4, 2005 2:56 AM
Chip, my wife bought me a set of buildings from Woodland Scenics (15 in the box) for Christmas. wink wink...
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,248 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Thursday, August 4, 2005 7:25 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dehusman

No flames, just suggestions.

I would suggest not having the the engine facilities break off the class tracks. I would put the engine terminal inside the loop.


I have envisioned the roundhouse at the end of the layout ever since thought of building it. It's funny how when you get your mind set, you don't think of the obvious. Great idea.

QUOTE: You might even want to reverse the lead and put it on the bottom with the class tracks parallel to the mains.


I don't understand what you mean by reversing the lead here.

I also don't understand the runaround on the bottom class track or the double crossover at the top.

QUOTE: I am not connected to a printer so I will have to study it some more and make additional comments later. I am looking at ho you will get a cut to switch or an outbound train from the class yard to one of the long tracks.

Dave H.


Thanks Dave, great suggestions.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Thursday, August 4, 2005 11:16 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SpaceMouse
The horizontal blue line is a back drop.

Could be more interesting if it wasn't parallel to the edge of the benchwork.

QUOTE:
If you look ant the right side of the main-line you have a classification yard. On the left side of the yard is a place where motive power can be switched without pulling into the yard

Perhaps I don't understand the "right and left" but doesn't this motive power switching route cross directly over the drill track?

QUOTE: IT doesn't feel complete.

I see the locomotive storage and repair round house but where are the servicing facilities? Sand, ash pit, coaling (wooding), water.

QUOTE: The spur off the back is for passenger car storage. It is just too cramped.

Well a 1917 logging railroad probably only has 50' passenger equipment so it shouldn't be as cramped as one normally thinks of mainline passenger yards with 1920's 80' equipment.

Other things...
Like dehusman, I don't understand what the short run around track in the center of the bottom track is for? In fact I don't understand the purpose of that entire bottom track.

The ladder on the inside (right hand side as one arrives from Eureka?) seems to waste lots of space and be a series of "S" curves to get to the far track. A straight normal ladder might be more boring but I think more effective.

The two tracks going to San Francisco and the Branch. Why not eliminate the turnout to the branch, connect the branch track to where the SF is now, and extend the inside loop around to be the main departing to SF?

As to the suggestion to put the turntable inside the loop, That would save a lot of space but how many pictures of model railroads do you see with a loop of track going around the round house? Answer - tons, that is the oldest trick in the book, but to me it ruins the round house scene being encircled by track. I can only think of one prototypical situation where there is track around a round house.



  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,248 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Thursday, August 4, 2005 4:56 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Texas Zepher

QUOTE: Originally posted by SpaceMouse
The horizontal blue line is a back drop.

Could be more interesting if it wasn't parallel to the edge of the benchwork.


Maybe, but the way I layed out the space, if the backdrop wasn't parallel, there would be an unreachable area. Also, the way I had it envisoned, was that it had an upper level.

QUOTE:
QUOTE:
If you look ant the right side of the main-line you have a classification yard. On the left side of the yard is a place where motive power can be switched without pulling into the yard

Perhaps I don't understand the "right and left" but doesn't this motive power switching route cross directly over the drill track?


Yes, and over the main as well. I hope and expect, this yard is a long way from complete. I'm greener than a lilly pad under a frogs belly when it comes to yard design.

QUOTE:
QUOTE: IT doesn't feel complete.

I see the locomotive storage and repair round house but where are the servicing facilities? Sand, ash pit, coaling (wooding), water.


I imagined them along the shorter track coming from the roundhouse.

As to the issue of whether the engines used oil or coal or wood burning locos. I just haven't found out. I know that the logging roads used wood frequently, but a lot of them imported coal. The NW was a jointly owned susiderary of the SP and ATSF. I'm not sure what influence that has on what they burned. I'm pretty sure oil was a common fuel in the period.


QUOTE:
QUOTE: The spur off the back is for passenger car storage. It is just too cramped.

Well a 1917 logging railroad probably only has 50' passenger equipment so it shouldn't be as cramped as one normally thinks of mainline passenger yards with 1920's 80' equipment.


I meant cramped against the edge of the layout. I was thinking more along the lines of more elaborate passenger car facilities.
QUOTE: Other things...
Like dehusman, I don't understand what the short run around track in the center of the bottom track is for? In fact I don't understand the purpose of that entire bottom track.


The short runaround is a caboose track. The lower two trracks I envisioned as A/D tracks. The train would pull into the yard, disconnect the engine and caboose and the switcher would take the cars away. The engine just travels the short distance to the turntable. As I mentioned, I forgot the cross-over at the lower end of that track.

QUOTE: The ladder on the inside (right hand side as one arrives from Eureka?) seems to waste lots of space and be a series of "S" curves to get to the far track. A straight normal ladder might be more boring but I think more effective.


I thought of that , but could not get a long enough lead.

QUOTE: The two tracks going to San Francisco and the Branch. Why not eliminate the turnout to the branch, connect the branch track to where the SF is now, and extend the inside loop around to be the main departing to SF?


This is a problem area I have not quite sorted out. The main to the staging track supposedly leads to a helix down. the problem is with the bottleneck in the upper right, the main climbing up to Eureka is in the way of any way down. The best I coud come up with is a 60 degree crossing--in a tunnel. Moving the main closer to the center makes the problem worse.


QUOTE: As to the suggestion to put the turntable inside the loop, That would save a lot of space but how many pictures of model railroads do you see with a loop of track going around the round house? Answer - tons, that is the oldest trick in the book, but to me it ruins the round house scene being encircled by track. I can only think of one prototypical situation where there is track around a round house.


It's new to me, but that's true of a lot of things. I'm still in my rookie season.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Los Angeles
  • 1,619 posts
Posted by West Coast S on Thursday, August 4, 2005 7:56 PM
Chip...... oil,oil,oil for fuel! SP owned lines were transitioning by the turn of the century, espically those located in fire prone areas or in those operating near forest perserves.
Just thought i'd pass that along.

Also, fire sprinkler tank cars were mandatory during the summer months to quelch right-of-way fires caused by brakeshoes or journel lubriciants subject to heat during periods of extreme braking.

Dave
SP the way it was in S scale
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,616 posts
Posted by dehusman on Thursday, August 4, 2005 11:25 PM
What I meant by "reversing the lead" is that you have all the switches on your switcing lead on the "diagonal" track running down the middle of the yard. Imagine if you will, all the switches in the same track as the one the caboose track breaks off of, and all the yard tracks run parallel to the main. That way the switches are all right near the edge of the layout making it way easier to see the lead car in each track and to reach in to uncouple cars when you switch. (Ergonomics).

If you lost the roudnhouse you could slide the whole yard to the right on the main and give yourself room to put some crossover switches just before the 180 degr curve. Remove the multiple crossovers from the tracks adjacent to the yard and make them into straight set out or arrival/departure tracks. Keep on track on the curve as a lead and the other as a main . The ultimate goal is to beable to make a straight pull out of the s/o or a/d tracks back onto the lead. Make the lead tie into the main on the other side of the curve. Then put in several separate tracks for the passenger terminal.

Put the roundhouse in the loop, but curve the backdrop behind it so it points to the corner of the layout (from above the backdrop will look like a hockey stick). Use a road overpass to disguise it passing through or past the end of the backdrop. If done "artfully" it won't be a roundhouse in a loop, its a roundhouse in a curve and you won't see the other side of the loop.

Remember paper and pencil is cheap. Electrons are cheaper. Sketch away.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 4, 2005 11:48 PM
Whoever said connecting the inside track had a good idea too. That would make the yard a layout in itself.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,248 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, August 5, 2005 4:00 AM
Here's my latest thoughts based on your feedback. There's more I could have added more but I ran out of awake.

It's certainly prettier, but I can't figure out how to get the engines from the A/D to the roundhouse. Or where to put the passenger terminal, although I can think of a couple of options for that.

Bringing the switches to the edge was a gret idea. I was planning hand throws.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,248 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, August 5, 2005 4:32 AM
Here's the prototype:



I daresay I have more track [:D] For Ukiah substitute SF staging.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Midtown Sacramento
  • 3,340 posts
Posted by Jetrock on Friday, August 5, 2005 5:51 AM
I have to resist the urge to ask if you're going to serve that track plan with red sauce or an alfredo...I know, I know, it's a yard, but it seems like there's an awful lot of track just sort of jammed in there in order to have a really really really big yard. I know you want to have lots of capacity, but that sort of design is the kind of thing I'd use to suggest a super-busy Class 1 yard in Chicago or Kansas City, not a sleepy backwater logging railroad held together with baling wire and string like the NWP. Especially if you're going to have two other major yards on the layout.

It sounds like you already feel like it is just too cramped--go with that feeling! Open things up to allow the majestic scenery I'm sure you want to model to take up a little space. And, heck, your current yard designs beat the pants off of the plans you used to post for the Hogwarts layout only a year or so ago...
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,248 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, August 5, 2005 8:01 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Jetrock

I have to resist the urge to ask if you're going to serve that track plan with red sauce or an alfredo...I know, I know, it's a yard, but it seems like there's an awful lot of track just sort of jammed in there in order to have a really really really big yard. I know you want to have lots of capacity, but that sort of design is the kind of thing I'd use to suggest a super-busy Class 1 yard in Chicago or Kansas City, not a sleepy backwater logging railroad held together with baling wire and string like the NWP. Especially if you're going to have two other major yards on the layout.


Actually, this yard is it. Eureka and San Franscisco are statging. Actually, I'm not looking for this to have super capacity, rather I want it to serve the purpose of efficiently handling the traffic of 4-6 people operating the model railroad.

QUOTE: It sounds like you already feel like it is just too cramped--go with that feeling! Open things up to allow the majestic scenery I'm sure you want to model to take up a little space. And, heck, your current yard designs beat the pants off of the plans you used to post for the Hogwarts layout only a year or so ago...


I had the dangest time figuing out what a yard lead was. Every diagram I looked at was always stubbed off and the author assumed you knew what he was talking about. So I'd draw them like I saw them, and of course, it drove people crazy. Drove me crazy.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Corpus Christi, Texas
  • 2,377 posts
Posted by leighant on Friday, August 5, 2005 12:27 PM
Santa Fe at Galveston, Texas had a tight radius reverse loop around the roundhouse apparently to turn passenger consists and locomotives. Shown on a circa 1980(?) CLIC (car-location-industry-spot) track map.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Los Angeles
  • 1,619 posts
Posted by West Coast S on Friday, August 5, 2005 1:16 PM
I don't understand this compulsive need common among a vast segement of modlers to cram every available space with structures. A highlight of the NWP was the rural scenery and small hamlets dotting the right-of-way that existed purely to serve the lumber and railroad industrie.

The more I observe certain design concepts of this hobby , makes me appreciate those into narrow guage modeling who have retained, practice and stress the concept of allowing scenery to dominate a layout.

Dave
SP the way it was in S scale
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,248 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, August 5, 2005 2:42 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by West Coast S

I don't understand this compulsive need common among a vast segement of modlers to cram every available space with structures. A highlight of the NWP was the rural scenery and small hamlets dotting the right-of-way that existed purely to serve the lumber and railroad industrie.

The more I observe certain design concepts of this hobby evolve, makes me appreciate the way those into narrow guage modeling have retained, practice and stress the concept of allowing scenery to dominate a layout.

Dave


Good input Dave.

I got you covered. The yard you see is back in the corner. The entire front--everything you see is going to be redwoods. I think that qualifies for scenery dominating a layout. Even so, I plan to prune the tracks a bit on the yard.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: CANADA
  • 2,292 posts
Posted by ereimer on Friday, August 5, 2005 9:28 PM
i'm not 100% sure of the year , but i think it was 1904 that there was a coal miners strike at the mine in new mexico where the ATSF got all their coal . that's when they switched to oil . ATSF's arizona (and probably california) subsidiaries switched either that year or the year after
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Friday, August 5, 2005 10:42 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SpaceMouse

Here's my latest thoughts based on your feedback. There's more I could have added more but I ran out of awake.

Wow, umm that's a lot. It needs fewer parallel tracks unless you reall need that much storage. Looks like you lost your passenger station track. And which ones are now considered the arrival and departure tracks?
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,248 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Saturday, August 6, 2005 12:07 AM
I'm pretty much working on Draft 3 which will be considerably less than either Draft one or two. There will be ideas from both one and two plus a plan I received via email. I think you'll find a major evolution if it works out.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,248 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Saturday, August 6, 2005 11:47 AM
Here's Draft 3. This seems like about the size of a yard that would fit the operations of the yard. As I see it there will be several types of freight coming into the yard.

Frist there willl be full lumber trains coming in from San Francisco. These will be switched from CW motive power to NWP.

There will be through freights from San Francisco that will just switch motive power and continue to Eureka--and vice versa.

There will also be through freights that drop the odd car off for delivery north.

Fuel oil deliveries for Willits and Union Lumber.

There will be locals both directions .

There will also be passenger car or two coming up from FRot Bragg to connect to Eureka or SF. The odd Union Lumber Executive observation car will be set out to attatch to passenger trains heading south or north.

All in all, this size yard woulod be maxed at an op session of this type.

The two spurs on the left are: top--team track; bottom--passenger car storage.

On the left 9 tracks starting at the bottom:

1--Main
2 A/D
3 A/D
4 A/D
5 Passenger Train Track
6 Engine access to Roundhouse
7 Short Classification
8 Short Classification
9 Engine Service

I forsee most of the action happening on the A/D tracks as most freighters will be through freights with motive changes. The locals will be broken down into forward deliveries and returns. Only the odd car would sit for a period of time.

I have not provided a place for CW motive power and cabosses to wait.

I can see a couple crossovers being needed on the A/D tracks.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Eastern Kentucky
  • 36 posts
Posted by dtbowyer on Saturday, August 6, 2005 7:39 PM
Chip,

I like it. It looks clean and to the point, much more so than the earlier versions. I think you are about there!

David
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,248 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Saturday, August 6, 2005 8:02 PM
Anybody? More Prototype photos


Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,248 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Sunday, August 7, 2005 12:50 PM
Draft Four and I don't like it as much. It's not as clean.

I forgot to add the Icing Platform and I needed a spot for the CW engine and caboose to wait for freight for the return trip.

So what I did was make these changes:

On the left 9 tracks starting at the bottom:

1--Main
2 A/D
3 A/D
4 A/D
5 Passenger Train Track/ Icing
6 Engine access to Roundhousenow CW engine and caboose storage and Icing Platform
7 Short Classification now Engine access to Roundhouse
8 Short Classification now caboose track
9 Engine Service

Also there are now two classification tracks above the team track and a couple crossovers.




I think I might need to reconceptualize.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Sunday, August 7, 2005 10:41 PM
I like that in draft 3 and 4 the main line gets the biggest radius curve.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,248 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Tuesday, August 9, 2005 11:10 AM
I think I have it. If I move the roundhouse to the center of the drawing with turntable just above the station. It gives me room to extend the yard track to the right and puts the service area coming off the turntable. It might work. [tup]

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Midtown Sacramento
  • 3,340 posts
Posted by Jetrock on Wednesday, August 10, 2005 12:07 AM
These latest two versions are definitely a lot more clean and usable and prototype-looking. Considering that there was a wye at one end of the Willits yard, I'd endeavor to make the wye visible. Things are coming along, though! Eager to see the latest version with the relocated turntable...

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!