Chip
Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.
Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's
Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.
Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com
Marlon
See pictures of the Clinton-Golden Valley RR
QUOTE: Originally posted by dehusman No flames, just suggestions. I would suggest not having the the engine facilities break off the class tracks. I would put the engine terminal inside the loop.
QUOTE: You might even want to reverse the lead and put it on the bottom with the class tracks parallel to the mains.
QUOTE: I am not connected to a printer so I will have to study it some more and make additional comments later. I am looking at ho you will get a cut to switch or an outbound train from the class yard to one of the long tracks. Dave H.
QUOTE: Originally posted by SpaceMouse The horizontal blue line is a back drop.
QUOTE: If you look ant the right side of the main-line you have a classification yard. On the left side of the yard is a place where motive power can be switched without pulling into the yard
QUOTE: IT doesn't feel complete.
QUOTE: The spur off the back is for passenger car storage. It is just too cramped.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Texas Zepher QUOTE: Originally posted by SpaceMouse The horizontal blue line is a back drop. Could be more interesting if it wasn't parallel to the edge of the benchwork.
QUOTE: QUOTE: If you look ant the right side of the main-line you have a classification yard. On the left side of the yard is a place where motive power can be switched without pulling into the yard Perhaps I don't understand the "right and left" but doesn't this motive power switching route cross directly over the drill track?
QUOTE: QUOTE: IT doesn't feel complete. I see the locomotive storage and repair round house but where are the servicing facilities? Sand, ash pit, coaling (wooding), water.
QUOTE: QUOTE: The spur off the back is for passenger car storage. It is just too cramped. Well a 1917 logging railroad probably only has 50' passenger equipment so it shouldn't be as cramped as one normally thinks of mainline passenger yards with 1920's 80' equipment.
QUOTE: Other things... Like dehusman, I don't understand what the short run around track in the center of the bottom track is for? In fact I don't understand the purpose of that entire bottom track.
QUOTE: The ladder on the inside (right hand side as one arrives from Eureka?) seems to waste lots of space and be a series of "S" curves to get to the far track. A straight normal ladder might be more boring but I think more effective.
QUOTE: The two tracks going to San Francisco and the Branch. Why not eliminate the turnout to the branch, connect the branch track to where the SF is now, and extend the inside loop around to be the main departing to SF?
QUOTE: As to the suggestion to put the turntable inside the loop, That would save a lot of space but how many pictures of model railroads do you see with a loop of track going around the round house? Answer - tons, that is the oldest trick in the book, but to me it ruins the round house scene being encircled by track. I can only think of one prototypical situation where there is track around a round house.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Jetrock I have to resist the urge to ask if you're going to serve that track plan with red sauce or an alfredo...I know, I know, it's a yard, but it seems like there's an awful lot of track just sort of jammed in there in order to have a really really really big yard. I know you want to have lots of capacity, but that sort of design is the kind of thing I'd use to suggest a super-busy Class 1 yard in Chicago or Kansas City, not a sleepy backwater logging railroad held together with baling wire and string like the NWP. Especially if you're going to have two other major yards on the layout.
QUOTE: It sounds like you already feel like it is just too cramped--go with that feeling! Open things up to allow the majestic scenery I'm sure you want to model to take up a little space. And, heck, your current yard designs beat the pants off of the plans you used to post for the Hogwarts layout only a year or so ago...
QUOTE: Originally posted by West Coast S I don't understand this compulsive need common among a vast segement of modlers to cram every available space with structures. A highlight of the NWP was the rural scenery and small hamlets dotting the right-of-way that existed purely to serve the lumber and railroad industrie. The more I observe certain design concepts of this hobby evolve, makes me appreciate the way those into narrow guage modeling have retained, practice and stress the concept of allowing scenery to dominate a layout. Dave
QUOTE: Originally posted by SpaceMouse Here's my latest thoughts based on your feedback. There's more I could have added more but I ran out of awake.