Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Code 83 for mainlines today?

652 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Wednesday, August 3, 2005 7:40 AM
Code 55 on some of your industrial spurs, particuclarly those in the foreground, would be a nice touch. Ruggedness shouldn't be an issue there.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 3, 2005 2:18 AM
Thanks to all of you for the help. I am thinking that code 83 seems to be at the upper end of the acceptable sizes, but it will be a good choice for my mainlines. If I have a passing siding on my single track mainline, do I use the same size rail as the mainline, or a smaller size?

I am thinking of the new Peco code 83 series for most of the mainline. The other option I am looking at is Shinohara. Do you have any comments on this?

For yards I will probably use code 70, and here Shinohara seems the best bet. I am reluctant to go finer than code 70 for reasons of ruggedness and reliability of operation. Any comments?

Thanks again, Ryan
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Tuesday, August 2, 2005 8:49 AM
Code 83 is fine for modern mainlines. 141 lb is NEW standard. Most of the UP's mainlines are laid with 115-136 lb rail.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Tuesday, August 2, 2005 7:13 AM
The only stretch of railroad ever built with the equivalent of code 100 is the corridor under the auspices of the PRR. That's what I am modeling and that is what I am using.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Minnesota
  • 659 posts
Posted by ericboone on Monday, August 1, 2005 11:48 PM
Yep. Code 83 is appropriate for HO scale modern mainlines and code 70 for the yards and branchlines. Code 100 is too big except in very rare cases.
Actually, I believe 132lb/yard rail is the average mainline today. 1950s mainlines tended to use 110 or 112 lb rail. Code 70 is close for that weight.
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Monday, August 1, 2005 9:23 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by uysr
Code 83 is equivalent to 132lb/ft rail. This was fine for 1950's mainlines, but is this still the size that UP and other class 1's are using on their mainlines?

In another thread, Dave H. (nhs792) states that UP and BNSF both use 141 pounds per yard rail today.

Of the commercially available track, code 83 is closest.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Code 83 for mainlines today?
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 1, 2005 5:32 AM
Hi all,

I'm Ryan from South Africa. I have been away from the hobby for about 5 years, so I'm a bit rusty. I am modelling Union Pacific.

Previous posts (plus NMRA RP15.1) indicate that code 83 will be suitable for mainlines and code 70 for yards etc.

Code 83 is equivalent to 132lb/ft rail. This was fine for 1950's mainlines, but is this still the size that UP and other class 1's are using on their mainlines?

Many thanks in advance

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!