Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Mchenry's couplers

2304 views
12 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Mchenry's couplers
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 21, 2005 5:53 PM
I am re-entering the hobby after a few year's absence. One of the last things I was working on was updating my HO coupler's to Mchenry's magnetic couplers. I thought I would get out a few cars and order some couplers and work on the cars until the weather is cool enough to work on the layout in the garage.
The couplers I was using a few years ago were designated " #51 KS Series Automatic and Magnetic". I looked on a couple sites and did not find the # 51. Tried to search for Mchenrys site without luck.
So is the #51 still the right code or have they changed numbers?
Or do they still make the magnetic set? Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Ken[?][8]











  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Thursday, July 21, 2005 6:18 PM
I think you need to look again at the McHenry Web site -- the #51 is still their standard (centered head) shank knuckle spring coupler. They offer many different styles now, in addition to the #51. The #51 is about half-way down the page.

Whatever you do, I highly recommend that you avoid the older style McHenry couplers that did not have a real metal knuckle spring.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: AIKEN S.C. & Orange Park Fl.
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by claycts on Thursday, July 21, 2005 6:29 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cacole

I think you need to look again at the McHenry Web site -- the #51 is still their standard (centered head) shank knuckle spring coupler. They offer many different styles now, in addition to the #51. The #51 is about half-way down the page.

Whatever you do, I highly recommend that you avoid the older style McHenry couplers that did not have a real metal knuckle spring.



I have 50 of these things how can I tell, LOOK or magnet?
Take Care George Pavlisko Driving Race cars and working on HO trains More fun than I can stand!!!
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Ma.
  • 5,199 posts
Posted by bogp40 on Thursday, July 21, 2005 7:07 PM
The knuckle spring is similar to the Kadee. If it has the plastic whisker for closing the knuckle don't bother using them. In that case, why not use Kadees? The most reliable out there.
Bob K.

Modeling B&O- Chessie  Bob K.  www.ssmrc.org

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:16 PM
All McHenry couplers are "magnetic" uncoupling, just like Kadee and the other clones. The term magnetic means that a magnet can be placed between the rails for automatic uncoupling. That's why the curved metal piece that is supposed to look like an air hose sticks down from the coupler head -- when you pu***he cars back over a magnet, the magnet pulls on those hoses and opens the knuckle.

We don't use magnetic uncoupling on our club layout because magnets can cause uncoupling when you don't want it. A shishkabob skewer can be used for uncoupling of all knuckle style couplers instead of relying on magnets.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 21, 2005 11:22 PM
Thanks, I found the site soon after I made my post. Are the Kadsees really better?
Ken
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: oregon
  • 885 posts
Posted by oleirish on Thursday, July 21, 2005 11:51 PM
Ken
In my MHO KaDee are the way to go,but a lot of expence changeing over.

JIM
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Friday, July 22, 2005 10:04 AM
Most, but not all, Kadee couplers are metal and McHenry and the other clones are all plastic. Which is better is a matter of personal opinion.

I have used hundreds of McHenry knuckle spring couplers with no problems. The original McHenry couplers were very brittle and did not have a knuckle spring. McHenry evidently received a lot of complaints about them and quickly changed their design.

Other people who apparently don't treat their rolling stock with care insist on Kadee metal couplers because they have broken plastic couplers.

Go ahead and use the McHenry couplers you have. You can always switch to Kadees if you start having trouble with them in the future.
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: CSXT/B&O Flora IL
  • 1,937 posts
Posted by waltersrails on Thursday, July 28, 2005 9:48 AM
I use the Mchenry couplers myself but the only problem i have with them is the spring coming out. (i also don't mind using bachmann spring couplers) .

http://ztrainman.tripod.com/
I like NS but CSX has the B&O.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 29, 2005 4:35 AM
My experience with McHenry has left them in the trash can. They just aren't kadees!!! They look nice, but I have had many cars with McHenry couplers uncouple themselves. The interior of the knuckle seems to be a bit convex, and upon heavy load they tend to ride up and out of the knuckle it is mated to. This has created several rear end collisions for me when I would walk away and leave the trains running unattended. I learned this was not a good practice either.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 29, 2005 7:32 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Tailspin Ken

Thanks, I found the site soon after I made my post. Are the Kadsees really better?
Ken
Much, much better. The best use for the McHenrys is a gondola scrap load.[:(!]
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: US
  • 269 posts
Posted by lesterperry on Friday, July 29, 2005 10:52 AM
Mc Henry [tdn] KaDee [tup] When I get a new car or Loco the first thing I do is remove the Mc Henry and put on a Kadee. If the wire hangs a liitle low and catches a crossing, magnet or switch the plastic shank will break on a Mc Henry. With a Kadee it will cause a derailment but no damage. I keep the Mc Henrys to put on anything I descide to sell and keep the Kadee. I have a neighbor who uses Mc Henry and complains all the time about uncoupleing problems but wont use the old hook horns because you can't back up. When I tell him to use KaDee we scoffs at me and says I don't know what I am talking about. I have 300 plus cars almost 100 Locos and been doing this for 15 years. So I guess I don't know what I am talking about. My trains have run flawlessy for 4 hours during open house events pulling 30 to 50 car trains.
Lester Perry Check out my layout at http://lesterperry.webs.com/
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Mp 126 on the St. Louis District of NS's IL. Div.
  • 1,611 posts
Posted by icmr on Friday, July 29, 2005 11:56 PM
I use Kadee couplers and have never had a problem. Only one of my cars has Mchenry on it and it does allright but i prefer Kadees. I do the same as lesterperry, when I get a new car or loco I pick up a pack of Kadees to replace the plastic ones that come with the car or loco. In short, use KADEES!!!!!!!
Illinois Central Railroad. Operation Lifesaver. Look, Listen, Live. Proud owner and user of Digitrax DCC. Visit my forum at http://icmr.proboards100.com For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. Let every thing that hath breath praise the Lord. Praise ye the Lord. Dream. Plan. Build.Smile, Wink & GrinSmile, Wink & Grin

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!