Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Another Track planning Newbie

10532 views
44 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • 571 posts
Posted by hwolf on Friday, April 21, 2006 11:18 AM
Coyete
I started my layout 21/2 years ago as a new railroader. The best advise I can give you is to purchase a software program which does track plans. The program I puchased was from El Dorado Software ( Ad can be found in Model Railroader). Anyone can use this program as I was also basic on my computer. First it allow you to start by laying out the room itself as well as the benchwork. You then will lay the trackwork including transitions into curves. It makes it fit so you don't have to. If you don't like what you are doing you just change it. after you have your layout complete you will be able to use the dimensions to transfer to the benchwork. My layout is also a Santa Fe going from the High desert inNew Mexico into southern Colorado. By the way I had a ball changing layout on software. It will also allow you to put in senery and buildings.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, April 15, 2006 3:23 PM
This thread is continued over here: http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=58895

for any that are intrested [:)]

Peace.
Coyote
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Thursday, July 28, 2005 7:18 AM
Good work with the 3rd Planit.

IF you are going with the dogbone, you need more room on the top of the "G" to make your turnaround loop. You can add a foot to the lower section of the top of the G, giving you a 4' x 4' square in front of the laundry area. You could leave just a 2 foot walk-through at that point or you could remove the same amount of space from the cross-bar of the the "G". Of course, it would look better if you rounded the table edges, but I haven't figured that one out yet.

There is also a couple unreachable areas, especially in the lower right. But all the outside walls are 3' and 30" is about maximum comfortable reach. This is a good thing because you can add to the dimensions of the top of the G. With a little added width, you can put a backdrop through the middle of it and have scenes on both sides.

I'm a person who likes to maximize the number of scenes. I would try to get the areas where you walk on both sides as close to 5' wide as I can. Although 3' wide isles are comfortable, I am making my isles 30" so that I can split scenes.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 27, 2005 9:00 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Larry NMRA

Coyote,

one thing I've not seen mentioned is the height of the layout. Usually wiring and other items are located underneath. And being over the hill myself I know it's difficult to work underneath sometimes. Try to make it high enough so you can sat on a short seat and work at a comfortable level for you.

This is from past experience on a large club layout and a home layout also. Also keep main wire runs near the front with feeders back to the track.

I know this is past the track design stage, but needs to be kept in mind as you design. If you can't wire a beautiful section of track or service it, it becomes a static layout.

Good Luck.

Larry NMRA


Larry,

Hello, and thank you for the advice, it is always appreciated. Right now we are looking at the top of the layout being around 46" so the OL can work on and enjoy it, and that was her height limit. All great points though, will add it to my growing list of things to remember/consider.

Peace.

Coyote
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 27, 2005 8:56 PM
Finally figured out 3rd PlanIt a bit...

Here is the area the OL and I have in the garage for the layout (at least potientialy [;)])

The Scale is 1 square = 1 foot.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 27, 2005 10:14 AM
Coyote,

one thing I've not seen mentioned is the height of the layout. Usually wiring and other items are located underneath. And being over the hill myself I know it's difficult to work underneath sometimes. Try to make it high enough so you can sat on a short seat and work at a comfortable level for you.

This is from past experience on a large club layout and a home layout also. Also keep main wire runs near the front with feeders back to the track.

I know this is past the track design stage, but needs to be kept in mind as you design. If you can't wire a beautiful section of track or service it, it becomes a static layout.

Good Luck.

Larry NMRA
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 26, 2005 10:07 PM
*coughs* [:I] Umm sure yes of course I knew the pic would get bigger *coughs* yeah that's it.. I knew.. that *looks side to side*

Thank you TZ, that helps a lot... sorry about the now silly question

[:)]

QUOTE: Originally posted by Texas Zepher

QUOTE: Originally posted by grandpacoyote
Im not sure I followed the discription you gave on the second drawing in terms of where the tunnels would be,

Did you know if you click on the picture it gets bigger? When you do that you can see a couple of places where there is a single loop of track that overlaps the double track. It is those two single track loops that would be hidden.
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Tuesday, July 26, 2005 10:01 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by grandpacoyote
Im not sure I followed the discription you gave on the second drawing in terms of where the tunnels would be,

Did you know if you click on the picture it gets bigger? When you do that you can see a couple of places where there is a single loop of track that overlaps the double track. It is those two single track loops that would be hidden.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 26, 2005 9:50 PM
TZ,

It looks simply amazing! I'm impressed beyond my ability to express... and a little lost [:I]

Im not sure I followed the discription you gave on the second drawing in terms of where the tunnels would be, however these are amazing designs!

Once again I can not thank you enough.

Coyote

P.S. Have you ever heard of a program called 3rd PlanIt? I just recently got it and looks very intresting, thought you might be intrested.



QUOTE: Originally posted by Texas Zepher

Here is the dog-bone saga. I did my initial idea (sort of an "E" shape) only to find out there was not enough space to do it maintaining the 24" / 26.25" minimum radius curves. So I just dog-boned the original design (below). I did not find it so interesting. So with a major change in thought I came up with dog-bone two (a most primative version also below). The problem with it is that to get this shape I really had to pinch some of the isles down to two feet. Very crowded, especially if one is trying to show off the trains to a group of people.
Dog Bone 1

The separation of the two tracks at the one point is due to a picture I have where at one point the Santa Fe only had a single track over a river. When they added the second bridge for the second track is was down river about 100 yards and at a slightly different angle, making a quite dramatic scene.

Dog Bone 2

Here the dog bone "loops" (upper right and upper left) would be in tunnels under the other trackage. The boring long straight track along long straight edges of the layout could be replaced by sweeping curves.

And then my final thought. On the original design simply replace the loop in the lower left (just past the staging area) with two loops one on top of each other and Walla dog bone layout. The problem with that is the train would have to pass all the way through the layout twice (once in each direction) to get back to the staging yard. Or if you're up to the engineering add a helix and have a layout that can operate as a loop or dog bone layout.
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:48 PM
Here is the dog-bone saga. I did my initial idea (sort of an "E" shape) only to find out there was not enough space to do it maintaining the 24" / 26.25" minimum radius curves. So I just dog-boned the original design (below). I did not find it so interesting. So with a major change in thought I came up with dog-bone two (a most primative version also below). The problem with it is that to get this shape I really had to pinch some of the isles down to two feet. Very crowded, especially if one is trying to show off the trains to a group of people.
Dog Bone 1

The separation of the two tracks at the one point is due to a picture I have where at one point the Santa Fe only had a single track over a river. When they added the second bridge for the second track is was down river about 100 yards and at a slightly different angle, making a quite dramatic scene.

Dog Bone 2

Here the dog bone "loops" (upper right and upper left) would be in tunnels under the other trackage. The boring long straight track along long straight edges of the layout could be replaced by sweeping curves.

And then my final thought. On the original design simply replace the loop in the lower left (just past the staging area) with two loops one on top of each other and Walla dog bone layout. The problem with that is the train would have to pass all the way through the layout twice (once in each direction) to get back to the staging yard. Or if you're up to the engineering add a helix and have a layout that can operate as a loop or dog bone layout.
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:35 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by grandpacoyote
Did you draw up the trackplan using RTS? I'm not sure if I read that right.

Yes, and got your e-mail so I'll be sending them directly. This was RTS version 5.0. I don't know if there are any difference in the .ral files between it and the current version or not.

Be warned that I used flex track to make the 26.25" radius outside curved tracks. The flextrack makes it difficult to "grab" other sections of track near it.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 26, 2005 4:50 PM
TZ,

A question for you, if I may...

Did you draw up the trackplan using RTS? I'm not sure if I read that right.

Peace.

Coyote
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: CANADA
  • 2,292 posts
Posted by ereimer on Thursday, July 21, 2005 10:11 PM
this is gonna be a really nice layout [:)]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:15 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Texas Zepher

As promised here is the double track version. I threw in a couple of spurs and I didn't shrink it so small, so one can get a better idea of what I was thinking. I wish I could sketch in some scenery stuff, and I wish I hadn't tried to add text, but oh well. I'll continue to work on the dog bone design, but this weekend is pretty booked.




T Z ,

Incredible! It is amazing to see some it take shape in the hands of someone with the skills to make it happen. I am almost giddy [:D] Please sir take care of your weekend bookings, I am still just amazed at your kindness. Wonderful work, it helps me so much to visualize this and helps to start get things rolling around in my mind.

Coyote

P.S. T Z, if you want or need to send me file you are more than welcome to send them to my E-mail address.
Thanks so much again.
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Thursday, July 21, 2005 7:03 PM
As promised here is the double track version. I threw in a couple of spurs and I didn't shrink it so small, so one can get a better idea of what I was thinking. I wish I could sketch in some scenery stuff, and I wish I hadn't tried to add text, but oh well. I'll continue to work on the dog bone design, but this weekend is pretty booked.
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Thursday, July 21, 2005 2:07 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by grandpacoyote
Yes Sir that is a wonderful design, although I will admit to you truthfully that I do not completly understand it all, I think I see a bridge there perhaps?

Ok. I'll try some words to help explain it. BTW - before I get started I did go back and double track this and it doesn't looks as crowded as I thought it would. ...

As you have probably figured out the isle is sort of a mirror image "G" shape that goes from the lower left and loops around counter clockwise between the tracks. I tried to keep it 3 feet wide but I think it will pinch tighter in a couple spots.

There would be a divider between the tracks at least from the center loop around the curves on the upper left.


Starting at the very bottom straight track. This is hidden and would be expanded for the staging area (three or four tracks) where the SuperChief would, rest out of sight waiting for her grand apperance.

The loop in the lower left would be a grade up so that the next straight track after it would be high enough to clear the trains in the staging area below. This second track after the loop would be one "scene" and could have a spur off to utilize the inside of the loop for an industry or two.

Along the entire right side is a second "scene" here the track from the staging area emerges at a lower level than the track from scene #1 above. This allows some canyon scenry, possibly a river, with trains in both the bottom and bridging over the top.

As it approches the top (what I've been thinking of as the front) it ducks into another tunnel and turns the corner emerging to become the long straight track at the very top. As shown this would be rather boaring (straight track along a straight edge of the layout, but that can be dealt with later). I envisioned this scene to be a passenger station where the SuperChief would have a scheduled stop, maybe even pick up an RPO (like it does in La Junta Colorado). Since it is a town there would also be a couple industries and and interchange to another railroad (SP or local short line).

Around the outside curve on the upper left is where I envisoned a "scene" where the railroad runs directly beside a busy Route 66. (Don't forget a maroon 1946 Ford convertible pacing the train! - long story).

On around that corner is the long graceful "S-curve" scene where the entire SuperChief can be seen against a beautiful desert background. I would consider this scene as the "showcase" of the layout. Route 66 might still be here, but there is enough space it can meander a bit and doesn't have to be parallel to the tracks. In fact it might want to cross the railroad into the isle and rejoin later.

Through the loop in the center the train enters another small town scene with once again an industry using the space on the inside of the loop. Route 66 would definitely have rejoined from the isle by now and pass through this town.

The reverse curve takes us back to the second track from the top here is the "back side" of the large town. So here again we have an interchange with "another" railroad. I can't visualize if this will be wide enough for a divider to make its own scene or if it just has to be a different view of the same one.

Anyway, from here the trains curve back through canyon country but this time on the top and over the bridges down to meet the other end of Scene #1.

Having re-read some posts I see you have right track, so I'll try to find some way to send you these files I am coming up with.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by davekelly on Thursday, July 21, 2005 1:33 PM
This hobby is filled to the brim with folks that are not selfish with their time, knowledge and abilities. We are indeed a lucky group! Maybe that's why so many of us have been involved for so many years.
If you ain't having fun, you're not doing it right and if you are having fun, don't let anyone tell you you're doing it wrong.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 21, 2005 1:18 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Texas Zepher
Ok after the description of your space, and knowing you want to see your SuperChief run, I came up with this general shape for a single deck layout that fits in 17x16 and does not have a duck under. That leaves a three feet wide isle on two sides to get to the washer dryer, work bench, window, and door.

It only has six "scenes" instead of eight. If you like the overall concept then you can start figuring out which scenes would be just scenery and which would have towns or industries.

The real stinger here is that except for the track from Glorieta to Albuquerque all the Santa Fe track along your choosen route would be double track. Double tracking this plan might make it look too crowded. I'll work on a generic dog-bone to simulate the double track and see if you like that better.

As usual let me know if this is the direction you want to head or if you were totally thinking of something else.



T Z,

Holy [censored]!

Sir, I am without words. In all honesty right now I'm shocked by the depth of kindness and friendship you have shown a total stranger by producing this. I can not express my thanks enough. The Trackplan issue has been one that has left me so lost and frustrated that outside of stealing others work.. something I was loathe to do.. I had considered putting off my venture into the hobby. At this moment though I am touched and awed. [bow]

Yes Sir that is a wonderful design, although I will admit to you truthfully that I do not completly understand it all, I think I see a bridge there perhaps?

I was considering having to limit myself to only 5 'scenes', the OL and I had come up with that in the last few days, so 6 would be incredible, Sir! [:O][wow]

As to double track, yes I was aware of that fact and had thought about simply laying double track side by side... However I would love to look at your dog bone design... I would be honored to look at anything you, in your graciousness, pass onto me.

Please excuse my lateness in response, been away from the forums during the OL's PT.

Again thank you!

Currently Floored... [:O][:O][:O][:O][bow]

Coyote
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by davekelly on Thursday, July 21, 2005 12:14 PM
Texas,

I like the rough plan you came out with. Very efficient use of space.

Andrew,

Mike Hamer's layout is very interesting. What captured my eye was his use of the "outside staging." While I don't know if he was the first, the use of such staging is definately a great idea for a room of that size. The avoidance of a multi-deck design can also be seen as a plus.
If you ain't having fun, you're not doing it right and if you are having fun, don't let anyone tell you you're doing it wrong.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 21, 2005 11:38 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by rfross

You might want to simplify and start small but build with future expansion in mind. I think one of the dangers of having a lot of space is to try to stuff layout into all of it and ending up with an overwhelming large project. So big that it eventually fails because the 'fun' turns into 'work' which kind of defeats the purpose.

I've got a shelf layout in an 11 x 13 spare bedrom in progress. The wall brackets and framework are in place and I'm in the process of installing the backdrop. I've spent a lot of time thinking about the track plan which I held off doing until the framework was up because that helped me visualize exactly how much space I had to work with.

The more thinking I do the simpler my track plan is becoming. In the end I'm probably going to only have a couple of passing tracks and maybe ten industries to switch at the most. My hope is it will be simple to maintain and most of all fun for the long haul.

One thing you could consider is to take the small layout plan book and add long connectors between the industries to help fill your space. It would simplify things and make it easier to manage versus cramming all the track you can into that very large area.


rfross,

Excellant advice and comments, yes it was becoming a bit daunting.. thanks for the encouragement though.

The OL may just start on a small piece and get our feet wet. *shrugs*

Thanks for the last idea on joining trackplans.. going to think on that one -hard-.

Peace.

Coyote
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 21, 2005 11:34 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Texas Zepher

QUOTE: Originally posted by grandpacoyote
The 20x19 space is the main Garage itself it is ringed by a 3' concrete 'riser' on two sides, a builtin workbench, washer and dryer, and shelve sits on that riser... the door to the house is also on that riser as is the only window in the room.. so the 20x19 space is completly free as long as I leave myself some space to get around it etc.

Do you have a preference for a minimum isle width. From this description as long as a 3' isle was left infront of the "riser" we should be good. That would basically leave a 16x17 space totally free to use...right?



Texas Zepher;

Yes Sir that is 100% correct...

Coyote

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: US
  • 269 posts
Posted by lesterperry on Monday, July 18, 2005 10:46 PM
Just one comment. Slow down, it took 2 years of planning for my layout and I love it.
Lester Perry Check out my layout at http://lesterperry.webs.com/
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, July 18, 2005 10:36 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by grandpacoyote

Hi Andrew,

Thank you for all the excellant advice it is great help and helped put my mind in a better direction, I think.

Going to show my ignorance here, which is easy for me to do [;)] but what exactly do you mean by "a twice (or three times) around", Im not sure I follow.

Thanks again.

Peace.

Coyote


Coyote...

Sorry for the delay in the reply. If you haven't found a definintion yet, I would sum up a twice (or three-times) around as a layout with multiple loops on the same level. They will be separated perhaps by different heights, but not completely separated on different decks. The loops are kept apart by slight differences in elevation, or by running through tunnels, or behind landscape features like hills or city scenery. The track will have to cross itself at least once (for a twice around). This can be done as a diamond, a bridge or what-have-you.

eriemer found Don Janes layout in Great Model Railroads 2001. (Thanks!). Take a look and you will immediately understand (despite my "definition"... ;) )

This is a nice layout, also featured in GMR (2004) and MRP (2001):
http://www.ovar.ca/Mike%20Hamer/Hamer.htm
You can see that the track is all on one level. Mike has elected to make the crossing hidden (a 60* diamond in the upper right of the plan). Even though Mike's plan goes twice around, you can see that the majority of one loop is taken up as staging.

Hope that helps.

Andrew
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Monday, July 18, 2005 12:20 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by grandpacoyote
[What I'm looking at is a large 20'x19' space, HO scale. AT&SF line, set in and around 1954, between California and Texas.. The Line will be those portions of the AT&SF line that ran near or by Route 66 which is the basis of the layout..
Running the Super Chief and also AT&SF freight..

Ok after the description of your space, and knowing you want to see your SuperChief run, I came up with this general shape for a single deck layout that fits in 17x16 and does not have a duck under. That leaves a three feet wide isle on two sides to get to the washer dryer, work bench, window, and door.

It only has six "scenes" instead of eight. If you like the overall concept then you can start figuring out which scenes would be just scenery and which would have towns or industries.

The real stinger here is that except for the track from Glorieta to Albuquerque all the Santa Fe track along your choosen route would be double track. Double tracking this plan might make it look too crowded. I'll work on a generic dog-bone to simulate the double track and see if you like that better.

As usual let me know if this is the direction you want to head or if you were totally thinking of something else.


  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Sunday, July 17, 2005 11:37 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by grandpacoyote
The 20x19 space is the main Garage itself it is ringed by a 3' concrete 'riser' on two sides, a builtin workbench, washer and dryer, and shelve sits on that riser... the door to the house is also on that riser as is the only window in the room.. so the 20x19 space is completly free as long as I leave myself some space to get around it etc.

Do you have a preference for a minimum isle width. From this description as long as a 3' isle was left infront of the "riser" we should be good. That would basically leave a 16x17 space totally free to use...right?
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Warren, MI
  • 89 posts
Posted by rfross on Saturday, July 16, 2005 8:08 AM
You might want to simplify and start small but build with future expansion in mind. I think one of the dangers of having a lot of space is to try to stuff layout into all of it and ending up with an overwhelming large project. So big that it eventually fails because the 'fun' turns into 'work' which kind of defeats the purpose.

I've got a shelf layout in an 11 x 13 spare bedrom in progress. The wall brackets and framework are in place and I'm in the process of installing the backdrop. I've spent a lot of time thinking about the track plan which I held off doing until the framework was up because that helped me visualize exactly how much space I had to work with.

The more thinking I do the simpler my track plan is becoming. In the end I'm probably going to only have a couple of passing tracks and maybe ten industries to switch at the most. My hope is it will be simple to maintain and most of all fun for the long haul.

One thing you could consider is to take the small layout plan book and add long connectors between the industries to help fill your space. It would simplify things and make it easier to manage versus cramming all the track you can into that very large area.
Modeling the Ballard Terminal Railroad (a former Northern Pacific line) in Ballard, a district north of downtown Seattle in 1968, on a two-rail O-scale shelf switching layout. The Ballard Terminal didn't exist in 1968 but my version of the BTRR is using NP power. (My avatar photo was taken by Doc Wightman of Seattle)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 15, 2005 3:02 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by leighant

A 20 x 19 foot room? I think of layout as linear track running through a scene. Such as an 18 inch shelf with track, a 3 feet aisle and another 18 shelf on the other side of the aisle. In a 20 foot room, you can have 3 aisle-and-track-on each-side combinations, each 6 feet 8 inches wide. (That makes each shelf 22 inches wide.) Suppose the aisle is S-shaped--starts in one corner of the room along one wall, makes a U turn at the end of the room and goes back through the middle of the room, then another U turn to end at the opposite corner from where it started. The track runs on a shelf generally 22 inches wide. The end curves on inside pninsulas may need a little more width to keep radius from being too tight, have to take that out of the shelf on opposite side or make aisle narrower just at that point. The track would go back and forth six times the length of the room. 19 feet x 6 = 114 feet plus a little extra on the ends. Background down peninsulas keeps you from seeing more than one route going past at any point. Like a map, right is always east, left is always west, regardless which way anything is in the original room.

This is the concept behind David Barrow's older layouts. Santa Fe in West Texas. See some of his articles such as

article _Model Railroader_ Feb75
radio control throttle related to track plan, _RMC_ Dec78 p.85
article RR Mod Craftsman Nov79 p.78
passenger operations 50s, Mod RRer Mar80 p.62
Expanding the Cat Mtn, Mod RRer, Aug79 p.60
Rebuilding & Updating, Mod RRer, May84 p.66
"Today's Cat Mtn" Great Mod RRs 92 p.26
yard throat design, Summit & Mesa _Mod RR Planning 97_ p.84
"25 Years on the Cat Mtn" _ModRRer_ Sep99 p.56



Thank you for the information.. I will try to find those articles.

Thanks again.

Peace.

Coyote
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 15, 2005 2:57 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by rayhippard

GRANDPACOYOTE,

I am about to start designing a layout for a 14' x 19' train room with one entrance door and no windows. Planned it this way and
have the room completely finished now including flat black painted ceiling, coved corners, painted masonite backdrops and flat
black painted masonite overhead valances to define layout outline and hide layout lighting. My plan is around the room but not
across the doorway. One peninsula juting out from beside the doorway into the center of the room. This gives me space on the
end of the peninsula for a helix to the hidden ( but accessible through black curtins ) lower level with double ended staging yard
connected to a second helix on the other side of the doorway. This will let me run trains in both directions without seeing the same train twice in one operating session. A view hiding backdrop down the center of the peinsula will let you follow your train and see
it in only one scene at a time. I will have a variety of scenes from big cities to open country to mountains. You may be able to adapt something similar for your larger space. I personnaly do not like the '" EXPOSED " multiple deck layouts because this usually
limmits decent scenery by lack of height and does not seem as realistic to look at when viewing a " scene " . Also, with my plan,
you look more realistic by having only one mainline running through each scene. With more room for industry tracks and scenery,
I believe this to be a more overall challenge to all of our modeling skills. I hope this gives you more food for thought. I also have
had to read TPfRO several times to get the gist of it and refer to the book as I design my track plan. Please keep us posted on your progress as this is one of the more interesting aspects of this forum to see how everyone is doing.

Ray ---- Great Northern fan.


Thanks for the advice and help! Will do on keeping everyone posted on how she goes.

Peace.

Coyote
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 15, 2005 2:56 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by railroadyoshi

grandpacoyote,

ereimer had GREAT stuff in his lat post

My worry for the layout you r designing is that since you want your layout to follow Rout 66 and it is in the desert, going multiple times around one deck will be VERY unrealistic, more so than say a mountainius layout set in the woods[^]

[#ditto] about Pelle's layout
DEFINITLEY look over that layout
You seem to be in a similar situation in many respects.

Good luck[8D]


Thanks for the advice and help [:)]
Peace.

Coyote

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!