Modeling B&O- Chessie Bob K. www.ssmrc.org
QUOTE: Originally posted by orsonroy QUOTE: Originally posted by jacon12 Ray, what did you use to hide the seams between the layers of foam, just the paint and ground cover? Jarrell Yep. Well, I did fill a few nasty areas with Great Stuff (foam in a can), but it's a PITA to carve and sand. And since I was modelling WV, most of the seams were hidden by trees (I used dyed toothpicks with little - thumb-sized - chunks of WS clump foliage for mountainsides. I feel it looks a LOT better than polly fiber puffballs). And as for getting to the tracks that went through mountains, I just made the entire tops of the mountains removeable. I hid the joints with trees, and no one was any wiser. Foam's great for that sort of thing.
QUOTE: Originally posted by jacon12 Ray, what did you use to hide the seams between the layers of foam, just the paint and ground cover? Jarrell
Ray Breyer
Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943
QUOTE: Originally posted by orsonroy My last layout was a freelanced WV coal line, so I needed a lot of mountains. I made all of mine with stacked pink foam carved into shape, and covered with a basic layer of latex paint and ground foam. I used plaster rock molds for any outcroppings then, but would probably just carve pieces of foam today. I've never bothered with adding a layer of plaster on top of foam. Why would anyone want to spend the money to add plaster, when the ground layer is already there, and staring at them? Moreover, why would you want to add a thin, brittle, and extremely breakable layer of plaster over a nice, resilient layer of foam? If some dope whacks into foam with his elbow, you'll just end up with a new dip in a field. If the dope whacks plaster, you've got a nice white hole in your scenery that you've got to spend hours fixing.
QUOTE: Originally posted by simon1966 QUOTE: Originally posted by selector You'll eat up a lot of valuable foam if you layer full layers; all you need is a 'front' to the mountain sides, so you can layer in a sort of pyramid-like shape, in profile, to your successive layers. As you woult think, the bottom two layers might be 7 or 8" wide, and the next two or three could be only 5, with the face recessed to give the effect of a slope, but the hidden edges (inside the mountain) might be flush, or nearly so. And so on. This is a really good point. Many of the free offcuts of foam I had were not big enough to make a full layer, so I used expanded white bead foam from packging to fill in the interior of the hill. It is quite clear on some of the first photos on the picturetrail site.
QUOTE: Originally posted by selector You'll eat up a lot of valuable foam if you layer full layers; all you need is a 'front' to the mountain sides, so you can layer in a sort of pyramid-like shape, in profile, to your successive layers. As you woult think, the bottom two layers might be 7 or 8" wide, and the next two or three could be only 5, with the face recessed to give the effect of a slope, but the hidden edges (inside the mountain) might be flush, or nearly so. And so on.
QUOTE: Originally posted by selector Jarrell, Ed and Simon did largely what I did. I was pleasantly surprised, and very pleased with my results. You'll eat up a lot of valuable foam if you layer full layers; all you need is a 'front' to the mountain sides, so you can layer in a sort of pyramid-like shape, in profile, to your successive layers. As you woult think, the bottom two layers might be 7 or 8" wide, and the next two or three could be only 5, with the face recessed to give the effect of a slope, but the hidden edges (inside the mountain) might be flush, or nearly so. And so on. In my case, I made the top layer removable, so that I could gain access to correct problems if I needed to. (My tunnels and a helix all run through that one mountain, so access was paramount). Edit: P.S.- take extra care when weighting any layers on your mountain, or the next one(s) will not sit right. This is where you get creative, because even if you do it all right, you'll still have some unevenness due to manufacturing of the foam board. Oh, well, it never goes THAT easy. Later, I added plaster cloth and Hyrdocal to places where I needed to anchor rock castings or to make a transition, or to hide a seam. Generally, though, ye olde wire brush did a quick, if messy, job of any slope shaping. It leaves a rough look, which you can shave or sand if you like, but I left it rough and slopped the tan latex over that. When sprinkled with various types and colours of ground foam, it looked great!
Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum
QUOTE: Originally posted by simon1966 The foreground trees are Scenic Express Super trees. This is a great product and the trees you see were my first attempt. I just followed the scenic express instructions for making them. Smaller ones were used at the front of the forest on the hill, with a few Woodland Scenic fir trees mixed in. The trees further back are just small balls of the Woodland scenic fiber soaked in dilute white glue and then shaken up in bags of differnt colored ground foam. Interspersed with these are some dead plant armatures from the garden to look like dead trees. I am not completely happy with the results of these rear trees as some of the colors are not great (I have since read Joe Furgate's thread on realistic scenery), so I plan to tone them down with some better colored ground foam.
QUOTE: Originally posted by simon1966 I layerd the foam (1" thickness as I got it free from a siding job leftovers) I made the rough shape by layering in the contours I did a little carving, but not too much, just to get the shape better Layered with plastercloth (I tried paper mache first and did not like the result) Applied rock castings Completed the look with a layer of gypsolite plaster to get final look. I tried going with a carved look directly in the foam, but did not like the result for the huge investment in time and effort. The plaster covering makes it much faster to get the contours and shapes and rock molds look great IMO You can see a sequence of what I did on my picture trail site (See link in signature)
QUOTE: Originally posted by electrolove Look at these links I found on the net. There is some info. But remember, this is only one of the methods. http://www.heinepedersen.com/hyllebane/landskap01.htm http://www.heinepedersen.com/hyllebane/landskap02.htm http://www.heinepedersen.com/hyllebane/landskap03.htm For my own layout I'm planning to use foam as the base, but cover it with some sort of plaster to get a better look. But I'm not there yet so I can't give you any advice what's best.