Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Woodland Scenics Track Bed

1307 views
4 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Woodland Scenics Track Bed
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 2, 2005 8:53 PM
Can anyone out there in model railroad land that uses Woodland Scenics Track Bed tell me what they think about it . Is it better than cork roadbed or not, is it easier
to work with etc etc etc.

Thanks
FAdkins
Route Rock
  • Member since
    November 2001
  • From: US
  • 732 posts
Posted by Javern on Wednesday, March 2, 2005 8:56 PM
I love the stuff and its all i use, easy to work with, nice and quiet. My LHS always has it in stock
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: CA
  • 245 posts
Vancouver Island MRR'S
Posted by bruce22 on Wednesday, March 2, 2005 9:24 PM
too soft, prefer cork.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, March 2, 2005 9:39 PM
I love this stuff. Particularly the 20' rolls, long runs without joints = smoother operation.

Soft is good. Runs quieter. REALLY quiet when you use adhesive caulk to glue it down - caulk doesn't dry rock hard. I mark my lines (on the outside - except for tight curves there's no need to split the WS roadbed like you do cork), spread a THIN bead of caulk (BARELY cut the very tip off the tube when opening it), spread it out with a putty knife, and press downt he track-bed. On curves and at joints I'll stick a few push pins in just in case, but caulk is tacky enough to stick it in place instantly, with some time to adjust if necessary. No way would I buy Woodland Scenics' glue for this stuff, for what the LHS charges for a bottle of WS glue I cna get a case of caulk. I use the caulk to fasten the track to the roadbed, as well, same technique. I am working on a 8x12 section, have one complete loop plus half a second loop, track and roadbed, plus all the rest of the roadbed in place right now, and I still haven't even used up the first tube of caulk.
In the past I used cork, and nailed it down, and nailed the track down. After starting the current layout - I would NEVER EVER go back to the nails and cork.

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Thursday, March 3, 2005 2:18 AM
I use it on my Yuba River Sub--I like it. One thing to consider, though, it is 'spongier' than cork, and even ballasted, it has a certain amount of give to it. Though I haven't run into the problem yet, I've heard from some other guys that if your track connectors aren't tight, the weight of the train might tend to loosen them a bit. Since I have some really heavy brass articulateds, I made sure that my joints were soldered, and ran extra feeder wires to spots that I thought I might have future trouble with. So far, no problems, and the track's been laid (and used) for over two years. And it is very, VERY quiet. You can actually hear the click of your loco driving rods. It's good stuff in my opinion.
Tom[^]

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!