Have fun with your trains
Originally posted by nobullchitbids The smallest (loop) was a freight-transfer railroad located in Manhattan, literally an oval running from a dock to a freight warehouse, with no interchange connections and curves sharp enough to put Tyco to shame. Actually, the 'dock' was a car float apron, the ultimate interchange track! RR was the Jersey Central, minimum curve radius was 90 feet (12.5 inches in HO) and the loop wrapped around a freight house. This was the home of CNJ 1000, the first U.S. diesel. Needless to say, the designers never anticipated auto racks, 89 foot hi-cubes or hundred ton hoppers! Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, November 22, 2005 12:15 PM My feeling is that for a home layout people would like to have the best of both worlds. We like to have realistic operating sessions with our fellow hobbyiests. At the same time, we like the continuous run option when we are the only ones around and are doing some scenic work on our layouts or when non-model railroaders are visiting. The key is finding a clever trackplan which can incorporate both aspects without people realizing it. A really great trackplan is Paul Dolkos' Boston and Maine RR. From an operations standpoint there is more than enough to keep a crew occupied. It is listed as a 16 by 29 foot layout but that includes the second room which functions as a staging. But on close inspection the layout is a well executed dog bone. The looping ends of the bone are hidden from the main layout -- one underneath the scenery and the other in an adjoining room. On that layout the point to point aspects can provide a satisying operating session. The continuous run option could keep a den of cub scouts engaged for 45 minutes. Reply Edit colvinbackshop Member sinceOctober 2005 From: Northern Minnesota 898 posts Posted by colvinbackshop on Friday, November 25, 2005 10:41 AM Each has it's merits and both on one pike can be accomplished, given some thought in the planning stage. My Trainroom (actual modeled area) is about 18' x 20', has two levels around three walls with a peninsula. I am also blessed with off pike staging at both levels that makes operation beyond the pike interesting. I'm not the spaghetti bowl type, so none of the track passes back upon itself, except on the loop. There is substantial switching at industries and towns (team tracks), but for the most part the trains run through a scene. The top level is basically two point to point Shortline RR's having a point to junction (Sawyer Lumber RR) with a point to point (Colvin Creek Railway), that also has a junction with a "class 1" mainline (DM&IR) to afford it to get to the lower level. The lower level is basically a point to point from staging on the lower level to staging on the upper level, but also can be operated as a loop with a passing back to itself through one scene. Puffin' & Chuggin', JB Chief Engineer, Colvin Creek Railway Reply jecorbett Member sinceNovember 2005 From: Utica, OH 4,000 posts Posted by jecorbett on Friday, November 25, 2005 11:24 AM My layout is an around the room dogbone with the end loops hidden and stacked to save space. The visible portion is therefore a double track mainline. Since my main classification yard is near one of the hidden end loops, operationally, it acts like a point to loop in two different directions. Very few trains run from loop to loop. I also have cutoff tracks on both mains that bypass the loops and turn the layout into a double track oval. While I can if I want use these to just run trans around and around, the real purpose of these is to allow loaded and empty unit coal trains to always run in the same direction, opposite to each other. I also use this for my rush hour commuter trains. In the morning, the inbound trains disappear at the east end of the layout and reappear as another inbound at the west end. In the evening, the process works in the opposite direction. By doubling or even tripling up these trains, I can run a lot of commuter trains with a minimum amount of equipment. Theoretically, these trains are traveling to and from an unmodeled terminal on the west bank of the Hudson which ferries the passengers into New York city. This arrangement gives me maximum flexibility and allows my trains to travel back and forth without the necessity to turn them at each end of their run. Reply bsteel4065 Member sinceJanuary 2001 From: United Kingdom 552 posts Posted by bsteel4065 on Friday, November 25, 2005 11:48 AM I'm up for both. I'm still putting the final touches to the plan of my new layout which has a lower section staging area that feeds an upper 'real' railroad area. First of all I liked the climb up to the real area and then a freight yard as an end of line operation with a locla delivering and picking up in the area while trains are made up to move on. I then thought it would be good to have the ability to just run trains around the top area. (Why not? I have a ten year old grandson too!) So that's what I'm going for. If I want to just circle run trains I can. It allows me to run trains around and around while I'm working on all the other stuff. Building scenery? Painting cars, trucks, people? Let the train run around and around! Reply 12 Subscriber & Member Login Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more! Login Register Users Online York1 see all » Search the Community ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT Model Railroader Newsletter See all Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox! Sign up