Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Newbie Question Regarding Benchwork and Sub Roadbed

2218 views
14 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: The Great American Southwest
  • 403 posts
Newbie Question Regarding Benchwork and Sub Roadbed
Posted by HAZMAT9 on Wednesday, January 26, 2005 10:11 AM
I'm new to the group and returning to model railroading after several years. I'm putting together a 6' by 12' layout and I"m overwhelmed with all the info out there in regards to both benchwork and sub roadbed. I originally planned on a simple cradle construction of 1X3's and 4's to hold 2" insulfoam and use Woodland Scenics risers and roadbed, though I want the layout to give the impession of deep depressions in some of the flat areas. My question, can I dig out the 2" foam \ / to make wedges and attach a piece of cut plywood underneath the cradle table to create \____/ an area to span a bridge or deep give the impression of a deep valley? Or should I stack two layers of 2" foam to equal 4" inches thick sub roadbed and do it this way? My point is that I want to create a very light yet strong layout. I really am trying to stay away from L-grider or butt end construction because of weight and long hours, but I'll do what I have to. Any help would be greatly appreciated. P.S. I have all the benchwork books, too many ideas and I still can't figure which one to use. Thanks, Steve
Steve "SP Lives On " (UP is just hiding their cars) 2007 Tank Car Specialist Graduate
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 26, 2005 11:59 AM
You can do it either way. If you're using 2" foam, digging it out and putting a piece of plywood under it as a river/canyon base would probably be the easiest approach.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: The Great American Southwest
  • 403 posts
Posted by HAZMAT9 on Wednesday, January 26, 2005 12:06 PM
Thanks Joe for the info, should I lay a base of 1/4" or so plywood beneath the 2" foam or use the existing cradle method and just attach a small plywood section for the river/canyon? Thanks, Steve
Steve "SP Lives On " (UP is just hiding their cars) 2007 Tank Car Specialist Graduate
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Wednesday, January 26, 2005 12:52 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by HAZMAT9

Thanks Joe for the info, should I lay a base of 1/4" or so plywood beneath the 2" foam or use the existing cradle method and just attach a small plywood section for the river/canyon? Thanks, Steve


The 1/4 would add lateral stability.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 26, 2005 3:13 PM
What he said. [:D]
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: The Great American Southwest
  • 403 posts
Posted by HAZMAT9 on Wednesday, January 26, 2005 3:23 PM
Many thanks to you guys for the help! Trying to push myself out the door to Home Depot this weekend but was somewhat hesitant. All plans are in place, just was overwhelmed by all the info. I plan to build John Armstrong's Granite Gorge & Northern railroad with some modifications and an extra mainline. May make the width a foot bigger or so going from 6' by 12' to 7' by 12'. Since the railroad is small to moderate size I wanted it somewhat portable to move just in case I ever find a bigger house someday. Again, many thanks.....Steve [:D]

Steve "SP Lives On " (UP is just hiding their cars) 2007 Tank Car Specialist Graduate
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: The great state of Texas
  • 1,084 posts
Posted by TurboOne on Thursday, January 27, 2005 1:06 AM
Hey Steve, I was all set to build what you are, but a friend on here shared his track plan and then I switched to a 14 x 8 with a 4 x 6 opening in the center, so I get a really good long double main line, I am raising a track so I have multi level, and easy reach to all parts of track.

Check out his website by the way. Here it is. http://www.readingeastpenn.com He shows benchwork, layout and background. Totally messed with my plans but looks easier and faster, and for me, more practical.

Either way, good luck. Let us know what you build.

Tim
WWJD
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Aurora, Ontario
  • 101 posts
Posted by northern_blues on Thursday, January 27, 2005 6:48 AM
Hmmn. That domain name doesn't seem to be registered anymore. I'd love to see the trackplan. Is there a new website instead of www.readingeastpenn.com?

Dave
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Thursday, January 27, 2005 7:22 AM
No, it's back in operation. The worthless spam filter they use at work lets the spam through but blocks the domain registration notices, but I have since renewed it. Although you included the question mark in your link, Dave, so that one won't work for sure.

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Aurora, Ontario
  • 101 posts
Posted by northern_blues on Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:28 AM
Yup, can see it now. Nice work on the site and great progress so far. I'm impressed.

I like to check what others have done in a medium sized space. I can fit 8' X16' but:
1) I live in a century home and the basement height is 5' 6" and is the only space available.
2) Bench height will need to be 36" and everything will be done and built for a sitting position.
3) No way for an oval like yours because I can't duck under. (too low)
4) I have a design for a double dog-bone but shaped more like a "C" with the ends of the "C" as two peninsulas so allowing a return loop and potential continuous running if I want. The spine of the "C" will be along the long wall (16')
5) A liftout is beyond my skill level at this time (first layout)
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Aurora, Ontario
  • 101 posts
Posted by northern_blues on Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:33 AM
Sorry, Steve!! I'm off topic with the last post [D)]

On-topic!

If you put a plywood shelf below the main level in order to accomodate the canyon/river, what methods can you use to place scenery on the sides of the canyon/river that is below the main level? Cardboard strips and plaster?

-Dave
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, January 27, 2005 1:50 PM
Yes, cardboard strips and plaster works. Or wire screen and plaster may be better, because you can mold the screen to more closely resemble the look you want for the banks before putting the plaster on.
  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Chateau-Richer, QC (CANADA)
  • 833 posts
Posted by chateauricher on Friday, January 28, 2005 1:13 AM
I was told by the owner of my LTHS (local train hobby shop), that it is better to use plastic/nylon screen, especially for tunnel roofs. Apparently, the metal screen has a tendancy to rust, and the rust might fall onto the tracks.

As for myself, I'm still in the R&D/planning stages; but I think I'll be going with foam for terrain construction over a 1/4" plywood foundation supported on 3/4" plywood (on edge) joists.
Timothy The gods must love stupid people; they sure made a lot. The only insanity I suffer from is yours. Some people are so stupid, only surgery can get an idea in their heads.
IslandView Railroads On our trains, the service is surpassed only by the view !
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 785 posts
Posted by Leon Silverman on Friday, January 28, 2005 7:50 AM
Timothy:
The rust problem would exist if you purchase steel screening, but it is also available in aluminum and animal proof plastic.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: The Great American Southwest
  • 403 posts
Posted by HAZMAT9 on Friday, January 28, 2005 10:11 AM
Thanks all for the help, going out today to get the wood, gave up on the foam idea although I will use it primarily for scenery. I picked up the Atlas "Seven Step-by-Step HO Railroad" book which had the track plan of the Granite Gorge and Northern. I see that their's a few 22" curves so not too overly concerned about the larger cars I have. I'll squeeze in a 2nd mainline by increasing the width, hopefully I'll be able to run my DD40X that's been sitting around for ever. I checked out the Reading Lines page and was quite impressed with their work, I can definitely get some tips from them. I may also add a switch yard either by increasing the width or a smaller yard by increasing the length a bit more. Unfortunately, I'm lacking space right now so I'll have to do with what I have (max 7 feet by 12 feet). Again thanks all and I'll hopefully post some pics once we getter going. ......Steve
Steve "SP Lives On " (UP is just hiding their cars) 2007 Tank Car Specialist Graduate

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!