N-gauge Track

[DSchmitt]

I use Peco code 80 for main lines and Peco code 55 for most sidings, secondary lines and industrial tracks. Everything I have runs on the code 55. I bought my first N scale in 1968.

[orsonroy]

Code 55 track is finicky. Lots of people are having issues with the new Atlas stuff, since it's VERY delicate, and so many N scale engines and cars don't like it. The Peco code 55 track is really code 80 track sunk into the ties, so it's not as fragile as ME or Atlas track, but you'll still have operational issues.

It all boils down to costs. Peco track is expensive, but their switrches are the best on the market. I only use Peco switches on both my HO and N layouts, so I'd say go with them. If you decide you want to go with code 55 track, you'll have the increased costs of the track, plus the expense of rewheeling all your cars to small flange wheelsets, and possibly getting rid of some or a lot of your engines in favor of new engines with small flanges. Are all those costs worth it to you to get a SMALL increase in visual accuracy?

In addition, smaller flanges means you won't be able to pull longer trains. The physics don't work in N scale. Ntrack discourages the use of small flanges on their layouts, which might also be an issue for you.

IN sum, I say stick with code 80. It won't break the bank, works reliably, and the size different is minimized with painting, ballasting and weathering.

[Anonymous]

I'm starting a new N-gauge layout. I've had good experience on previous layouts with Peco Code 80 track. I'd like to use Peco Code 55 on the new layout, but I'm wary of having problems with wheels riding up, etc. Someone suggested using Micro Engineering Code 70 as a compromise, but the stuff is really expensive.

Does anyone have any recommendations, based on experience? Thanks.