Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Layout Staging Yards

7176 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2008
  • 216 posts
Layout Staging Yards
Posted by NILE on Saturday, November 14, 2020 12:47 PM

As I start planning my next layout.  I know I want to have plenty of staging, trains need to have someplace to go and come from.  I do run some long trains like intermodal and autoracks/parts so I'm thinking I'll need at least 10-12 feet and six or seven tracks (HO scale).

What are some different techniques in using staging yards on layouts?  Please post pictures of different staging yards.  On layouts that using staging, is there also a working yard on the layout?  What are your thoughts about staging yards?

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Saturday, November 14, 2020 1:24 PM

First, congratulations on recognizing the need for staging and planning for it.  Well done.

I built my layout without staging.  Realizing my error, I expanded the layout and built a visible staging yard, but I built scenery as well and stopped using it for staging.  The next staging, which I never finished, is hidden.

Even that staging is wrong.  It is unfortunately single ended, and requires a long and somewhat awkward backing procedure to properly return a train to staging.  If there's a next time, it will be double ended.

There are no turnouts in my hidden staging, just at the staging yard throat which is visible and accessible.  Even with indicator lights or video coverage, hidden turnouts are a derailment waiting to happen.

Yes, I do have another yard on my layout.  I also have a carfloat, which can be used as a casette to create "portable" staging.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 869 posts
Posted by davidmurray on Saturday, November 14, 2020 2:02 PM

I have a single ended staging yard of seven tracks.  But it can be enter from to different points so serves as both the north and south end of the layout.

I also have a switching yard, so a freight comes in and is broken up, then the locals go out.

Passenger trains starting staging and finsh in stageing, the 0-5-0 swither move engines to opposite end for a second run.  Iron goes grom the staging to the mine, switches, and returns.  Thru freight passes thru, reversed between sessions.

 

 

David Murray from Oshawa, Ontario Canada
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Morristown, NJ
  • 808 posts
Posted by nealknows on Saturday, November 14, 2020 2:14 PM

I agree with Mister Beasley about needing staging yards. Great thing to have.

On my railroad, I have 9 staging tracks on the lower level which can be entered from both sides. I also have a freight yard on the upper level which handles locals as well as freight cars being dropped off from another destination (staging) or a train heading to another destination (staging). 

I run 15 car intermodal trains with a pair of 6 axle engines and it sits on a track that is a good 20 feet long. My auto rack train has a pair of 6 axle engines and 10 auto racks. Based on the types of trains you want to run, those intermodal and auto rack/ auto parts cars won't be that long since you state the lengths of the yard tracks are 10-12 feet. 

Are your staging tracks stub end or have the ability to enter from both ends? Are you leaving the engines on the train or just leaving the cars on those tracks? Engines take up space and you may need to leave just the well cars or racks on those tracks without engines. 

Here are a couple pics of my staging tracks below..

I'm sure you will need longer tracks if possible especially if you're going to run long trains..

Neal

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • From: California
  • 2,388 posts
Posted by HO-Velo on Saturday, November 14, 2020 8:37 PM

With a small switching layout I was hesitant about committing space for a staging/fiddle yard, but sure glad I did.  The fiddle yard serves a few valuable roles; drill track for the visible working yard, spurs for a few off-line non-modeled industries and storage.  My static carfloat scene is the layout's interchange and the fiddle yard allows a hands-off exchange of outgoing with incoming cars between operating sessions.     

Happy layout planning, regards, Peter

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,892 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Saturday, November 14, 2020 9:22 PM

My layout is under construction but the staging yard is about done.  I wanted lots of capacity so this one has as much as I could squeeze in:. 11 track that can hold trains ranging from 17' long to as much as 24'.

 

Each track will be fully isolated to allow power to be disconnected as DCC is all tracks live all the time.  Some have advised the ability to isolate so there isn't the potential for power drain if you have too many sound equipped or light equipped models in storage.

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,392 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Saturday, November 14, 2020 10:33 PM

On a layout I built in the early 2000's, I had planned four staging yards. I got two fully built. One represented Seattle and the other represented Minneapolis on the Northern Pacific. They larger of the two could hold 45 car trains. Here's a shot of Seattle, the smaller yard at three staging tracks:

And the larger one, Minneapolis, with five staging tracks:

They were designed to be hidden under other trackage. I actually began building above Minneapolis before the layout came down due to a work transfer:

Ever since then I've planned for staging, because it connects the layout to the "real world." One very space-efficient way to do staging (because it allows for long tracks), and which you'll see often, is staging in a reverse loop under a "blob". This is the main staging yard designed for my current layout:

This will hold 50 car trains on each track, but will generally be used to hold two trains of 23 cars or less on each track. It's pretty big - the innermost radius is 28 inches. The gray squares are one foot each. This is hidden under a peninsula.

All of my layouts have "working yards." Staging is used to do three things:

  1. Bring trains to the working yard to be broken up and rebuilt into new trains;
  2. Provide run-through trains that will traverse the layout and return to staging, stopping only for crew and engine change at the working yard; and
  3. Provide direct-to-staging on and off for specific industries (like a refinery on a branch that's near the staging yard exit from the layout).
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 148 posts
Posted by Maurice on Sunday, November 15, 2020 12:25 AM

I think double ended staging is best if you can manage it. I have seen some layouts that use a helix at each end to reach a double ended staging below the modeled portion of the layout and that seems to work well. Personally, I am model a shortline and a small portion of a class I (Conrail). I use a loop to model the Conrail portion to have trains in both directions to deliver cars for the shortline to switch on it's branches. I am still developing the operations and building the branches. I got this idea from MR's Carolina Central layout. Good luck with your layout and happy modeling.

Cheers!

Maurice

 

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • From: Southern Florida Gulf Coast
  • 18,255 posts
Posted by SeeYou190 on Sunday, November 15, 2020 12:29 AM

NILE
What are some different techniques in using staging yards on layouts?  Please post pictures of different staging yards. 

My next layout will feature a double ended run-through staging yard. My train lengths are only 6-12 cars, so it is not very long.

The staging tracks arew in the gray section.

-Kevin

Living the dream.

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,439 posts
Posted by dknelson on Sunday, November 15, 2020 12:35 PM

"Staging yards" as a phrase describes so many different situations and uses.  Some early track plans such as Linn Westcott's famous "If I Had a Million" had "staging" but did not use the term - they were holding tracks, a place to hold a train where it cannot be seen to effectively "lengthen" the run, meaning the time it takes to reach an ultimate destination.  This is still a valid part of track planning and operation in my view.  

In more recent decades I think the major planning distinction has become less about hidden versus visible staging, as it is between active and passive staging.  Until the owner died I was a regular operator on a very large and "finished" layout that had multiple staging yards, but all were hidden (no scenery) and all were purely passive, in that nobody touched the trains. He also had at least three "real" modeled yards where trains arrived, departed, were assembled, were sorted and taken apart.  One had a car float as almost its own yard.

His car forwarding system was such that a train that arrived in staging would be a train that departed at the next session.  In other words visually the track plan looked like continuous run; in actual operating terms it was point to point.  Only for layout tours and shows did it run continuously.  His computerized car forwarding system "knew" what length of train to send to staging -- each track could hold two complete trains.   

Some guys do not like that re-use of a train that has arrived at staging because it might lead to the dreaded "I've run this train before" feeling, but fortunately that very large layout hosted multiple op sessions every month with different crews, so the chance of taking out the very train you took into staging was virtually nill.

And best of all, the moment an op session started you knew you had trains made up and ready to go for the crews.  Otherwise at some layouts the yardmasters are the only ones doing anything for the first 30 minutes or so.  

Another large but much more stripped down layout I operate on also has that staging yard, not hidden like a lower level or inside a mountain, but in a back room where visitors rarely wander, where it makes the layout schematic look like continuous run but is actually point to point.  It has no scenery but it would not be foolish to put in a bit of scenicking.  In this case the same staging yard represents the extreme ends of the layout -- Galesburg and East Peoria -- with the BN, TP&W, Peoria & Pekin Union all using the same tracks.  But it is active staging; as a train comes in the yardmaster immediately knows that just about every car has to be removed from the layout and replaced with a stored car.  It can get hectic. Also loaded open top and flat cars get emptied and empty cars get loaded.  This is a great way to have a layout with modest needs for cars for local industries to work its way through a collection of cars that would otherwise be "too large."

There was just one "real" working yard on the layout, Peoria.  East Peoria (staging) is across "the river" (not modeled).

The only trains that remain intact and come in one end and leave by the other in staging are the unit coal trains.  They do not visit the "real" yard either.  As a rule those were also the only trains ready to go for the crew at the start of the next op session.

Yet a third layout I operated on had totally hidden (back room) staging but it looped around a furnace in very tight quarters and if there was a derailment or a broken coupler or balky locomotive only the owner's teenage son had the agility to go in there and help out!  No way could I bend myself like that.  It was not ideal.  It had two modeled working yards in addition.  The yardmaster of one was also in charge of getting trains out of staging for the crews.

Sorting through all the options I have seen and operated on I think these are my criteria for successful staging yards - and these are purely personal views about track planning in general.

1.  There needs to be good practical access.  Things go wrong, people make mistakes, things need attention and maintenance.  Hidden from view is fine; buried deep in a mountain or behind fascia that cannot be removed, or at a lower level that is too low to work with, is not fine.

2.  Continuous run without duckunders (stairs that come down in the center of a room for example) is fine.  If continuous run means a duckunder or gate or such, that's not for me.  I am too tall and too old.

3.  It is important to crew happiness not to force people to just stand or sit around while a yardmaster can create (under pressure) the first train of the night.  Whatever system is used, a train or two needs to be ready to go when the clock is turned on.

4.  If staging is out in the open and not hidden in its own room, then either it should be scenicked (if lightly) or in some manner it should be made plain that it is not part of the "modeled" world.  For example, paint the plywood and subroadbed black and use track with black ties, no ballast.  Another possibility would be to use something really different looking, like Peco's concrete tie track and paint the plywood and subroadbed concrete gray to match.  

5.  Having seen it done and having seen the benefits, I like a system of operating one or all active staging yards that use a staging yardmaster "mole" to remove and add cars by hand to keep the supply of cars on the layout fresh, with new destinations and appropriate appearance for loaded/empty needs.  This means lots of Atlas re-railers!  

6.  Stub ended staging that uses turnouts at the far end take up horrendous space.  Better to explore one or more of the British ideas from their exhibition layout staging areas: sector plates, cassettes, train turntables.  And again, more Atlas re-railers.

Dave Nelson

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Potomac Yard
  • 2,767 posts
Posted by NittanyLion on Sunday, November 15, 2020 1:16 PM

nealknows

 

I'm curious what your separation is between the upper and lower decks is.  My layout is still firmly in the planning process, but I know that I'm doing an unsenicked staging level. Looks like your upper deck is 1x3s too? 

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Morristown, NJ
  • 808 posts
Posted by nealknows on Sunday, November 15, 2020 1:21 PM

I have 12" separation between the top of the plywood of the lower level to the bottom of the plywood on the upper level. I did use 1"x3" for my framing. I can reach the back as the depth is 30" and all turnouts are Atlas with top mount switch machines for ease of change. 

Also, since my staging tracks are long, they're split in 2 electical sections and I have toggle switches on each section to kill the power if I have sound engines on them. 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!