Agreed. Despite what I have heard about #4 turnouts, the ones I have so far have not caused any problems. My current layout that I'm building is the first using Unitrak. While some may make the arguement for more realistic C55, you can't beat the reliabilty of Kato track and if you factor the cost of switch machines with regular turnouts, the switches are actually more affordable. Durability is another factor considering that the layout is designed in sections to allow me to take it with me if I every decide to move.
SS Chief WawatamApparently, Kato #4 switches (or at least older ones) require a slight filing of the inner part of the rail at the switch points to avoid possible derailments.
Interesting.
I do not remember any comments about this issue at all.
I would not be worried about the quality of any Kato product. That is one brand I would trust fully.
-Kevin
Living the dream.
[quote user="SeeYou190"]
What modifications does a Kato #4 turnout need in N scale?
I have been 100% happy with all of my Kato products in both HO and N scale for decades.
Apparently, Kato #4 switches (or at least older ones) require a slight filing of the inner part of the rail at the switch points to avoid possible derailments. There have been numerous discussion about this on the web in the past.
Does anybody know if the Kato wye turnout is fine as is out of the package or does it require the same modifications as with the #4 turnout? I am planning on using one for a small industrial park off my main line.