Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Modern engine stall

4603 views
15 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Monday, April 17, 2017 1:12 PM

PS:

A 1/29 U25B is a bit over 25" long.  I wouldn't be surprised if what Marc is after is the smallest engine house that works and doesn't look stupid.

So, going back to full size dimensions, the overall length of a U25B is 60'-8" (over couplers).  The major door size I would keep.  If one adds 4' all around, then the minimum interior dimension is 14' x 68'-8".  If one then adds a foot for wall thickness, then the minimum exterior dimension is 16' x 70'-8".  I think an enginehouse without a shop is just plain weird.  So I would add an arbitrary 14' to the width for the shop, office, etc.  Thus 30' x 70'-8".  Which is 12.5" x 29.25".  Or .3m x .75m.  I'd also skip the craneway and go with a flat roof.  Which would give an external height of 26'--10.75"--.27m.

Which is suspiciously similar looking to that Pikestuff building--same width, 11' longer.

That said, I'd call this a minimal building, and try to add "something".  First would be another major door out the back.  A bigger (wider) shop would be nice, too. 

Ed

 

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Monday, April 17, 2017 12:22 PM

marctje
 

 

 

After research and talking to a friend, i've found out my model isn't a Bachmann GP38 but a Aristocraft GE u25B in scale 1/29....this means the era i have to make is between 1965 and 1975

 

 

Well.  Sort of.

The Union Pacific U25B's were built in 1961 and 1962.  They were retired in 1972.  During most of that time, they were likely in mainline service.  So seeing just one at a small enginehouse would be very unusual.

BUT.

Some of them ended up on the OC&E, a small railroad that went east out of Klamath Falls, Oregon.  Roughly, in 1976.  And they, again roughly, lasted until 1991.  IF you wanted to repaint and reletter yours, they were done in this attractive color:

 

 

Should you NOT wish to do a repaint, you could argue that they just arrived and have to be put to work right away.

Anyway, here's a picture of an OC&E enginehouse:

 

Note the main doors, and above, the auxiliary doors for the craneway.  You can see the building has some length.

Being black and white, this building might have been gone by the time the U25B's arrived.  Or might not.  But you can see a typical enginehouse on a railroad where "your" U25B ended up. As OC&E 7605.  For awhile.

You can learn more about the OC&E from the book by Jeff Moore: "Eastern Oregon Shortline Railroads".

Weyerhauser (a big lumber company) also got some, and they were also painted nicely.  There's a lot of material about Weyerhauser out there to learn from.

You can learn more about Union Pacific U25B's at the website Utah Rails.

 

Engine houses were not houses for engines.  At least, in later days with diesels.  They were places where work was done on engines.  As such, there was a sheltered area to work on the engine.  And a shop with benches and tools.  There was also an office.  And there was a storeroom for parts and materials.  Only small quantities of flammables would be inside--large quantities would be stored a safe distance away.  Oh, yeah.  A bathroom.  And maybe a locker area.

 

 

If you are more in a freelance kind of mind, a few comments:

Enginehouse design was based on four main things: era, location, number of engines, and amount of money to spend.

The first is, indeed, pretty much set for a U25B.  But I would argue that, in this case, it is from about 1975 to the present.

Location affects building style.  In a warm dry area, you almost don't need walls.  And, since you generally WILL have (some) walls anyway (security concerns and all), there will likely be a door at EACH end of the building, to catch a breeze.  Also, on the west coast, masonry would be rare (earthquakes).  Generally, though, in the post 1975 era, these buildings will be metal sheathing over a steel frame.  Second might come concrete block, or maybe a "tip-up".  Wood sheathing and framing falls out of favor for fire safety reasons.  Even if it is attractive and nostalgic.  

Number of engines.  Kind of self-explanatory. The more engines, the more stalls.

And then there's money.  The chief mechanic would DEARLY love to have everything that enters his mind.  Preferably two of them.  The financial officer might disagree.  But if the mechanic makes his case and the money's there, the thing gets bought.

 

 

So, to the details:

An engine is always nominally 10 feet wide.  Add two feet on either side for person passage, and you get a door width minimum of 14'.  16' might be the max.  Height of door would be enough to clear the engine.  Diesels are all about the same height.  About 15 1/2 feet high.  So a minimum clearance above rail top might be 16 1/2 feet.  And maybe 18' for the max needed clearance.  That's the door dimensions.

The building has to be long enough for the locomotive(s).  And the railroad doesn't want to find out when they buy another new locomotive that there's a problem.  So I would go with a locomotive length over couplers of 66'.  Then add 4' on either end for person clearance.  And add 2' for wall thickness.  And get a recommended length of 76'.  Minimum.  The mechanic might well yearn for another 12' or so, so that he can jack up a locomotive and roll a truck out for work.  Inside height at the locomotive should be at least 24', so that workers can stand straight up on top of the loco.  If there is a craneway, additional height will be needed--allow for the height of a typical lifted part, the crane and craneway.  You DON'T need the height of a real locomotive shop, where they might lift and transfer an entire locomotive.  I'm totally sorta guessing, but I'd add another 12' for that device.  The height of the rest of the building will proceed from this dimension.  The width inside will be based on a 10' wide locomotive, about 4' of clearance (minimum) on each side, plus the width of the necessary shop.

 

There has to be at least one "major" door.  Frequently, the track goes out the back aways through another major door.  The chief mechanic will be happier.  A second parallel inside track (and door(s)) can be very useful--ask the chief mechanic.  The shop area has to be big enough to work in and to hold the tools, large and small.  It tends to be on one side of the building because you don't want to have to "crawl over" the engine every time you need to go to another task.  Storeroom and office dimensions can also be developed from imagination/real life.

The inside of the building would likely be paved, excepting the office and bathroom.  A pit between the rails could certainly be useful, but I don't know how often they were used in a building like this.  The office would likely be heated.

Car repair work could also be done in this building.  Especially on a cold rainy day.  

Windows (those big multiple ones) seem to happen less often with later buildings.  

A building like this is perfect for an interior.  And lighting.

 

Ed

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Monday, April 17, 2017 11:59 AM

 Based on the pictures you posted, the doors are 20-25 feet tall and maybe 15 feet wide. That would clear a modern large diesel, definitely clear a GP38-2. You can estimate the rest of the structure dimensions based on that. And then convert to your scale to get the actual size you need to build. Check it out with a mockup (cut the door opening in a piece of cardboard, for example) to make sure it really does clear the actual model. A single stall on some shortline somewhere will be a very simple steel structure if built new, or it could be a repurposed older structure with different construction and perhaps the original end replaced with the large door if it didn't already have one.

                             --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,024 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Monday, April 17, 2017 7:13 AM

Take a look at this web site and see if it can be of help to you.

http://www.modelbuildings.org/engine-shed-B435.html

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: Edegem, Belgium
  • 35 posts
Posted by marctje on Monday, April 17, 2017 6:42 AM

marctje

My engine is a Bachmann GP38 in 1/35,5 G. No idea of the period this was used.

 

After research and talking to a friend, i've found out my model isn't a Bachmann GP38 but a Aristocraft GE u25B in scale 1/29. i put some photos here

 GP38-2 G scale4 by Marc De Groulard, on Flickr

 GP 38-2 G scale by Marc De Groulard, on Flickr

 

this means the era i have to make is between 1965 and 1975

 

Union Pacific and Amtrak in Belgium

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: Edegem, Belgium
  • 35 posts
Posted by marctje on Tuesday, March 7, 2017 8:08 AM

My engine is a Bachmann GP38 in 1/35,5 G. No idea of the period this was used.

Union Pacific and Amtrak in Belgium

  • Member since
    January 2016
  • 70 posts
Posted by jlehnert on Tuesday, March 7, 2017 4:44 AM

What year do you plan to model?  And what type of engine do you plan on putting in it?

If you're doing anything near current, the engine house is going to have to be larger than 60 ft.  Even an old GP38-2 that's been relegated to switching duties is 59.5 ft. 

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,676 posts
Posted by maxman on Monday, March 6, 2017 11:36 AM

marctje
i'm thinking more like this engine stall 3 by Marc De Groulard, on Flickr

That engine house appears to be a Pikestuff item.  Walthers shows an N scale version in their on-line catalog:

https://www.walthers.com/small-engine-house-scale-30-x-60-9-1-x-18-3m-blue

According to Walthers, the structure is 30 X 60 N scale feet (9.144 X 18.288 meter).  Since there are so many different ratios involved with whatever G scale is, you'll have to figure out the conversion yourself.

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Canada, eh?
  • 13,375 posts
Posted by doctorwayne on Sunday, March 5, 2017 1:23 PM

marctje

i'm thinking more like this


For one on a branchline, this one would be the type most likely used, unless there was an older structure available in that locale, capable of accommodating the locomotive which you have in mind.

Wayne

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: Edegem, Belgium
  • 35 posts
Posted by marctje on Sunday, March 5, 2017 10:00 AM

BroadwayLion

Something like this, I suppose...

 

ROAR

 

something like that but for one locomotive on a branchline UP directed

Union Pacific and Amtrak in Belgium

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: North Dakota
  • 9,592 posts
Posted by BroadwayLion on Sunday, March 5, 2017 9:14 AM

Something like this, I suppose...

 

ROAR

The Route of the Broadway Lion The Largest Subway Layout in North Dakota.

Here there be cats.                                LIONS with CAMERAS

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: Edegem, Belgium
  • 35 posts
Posted by marctje on Sunday, March 5, 2017 7:11 AM

i'm thinking more like this

 engine stall 3 by Marc De Groulard, on Flickr

 engine stall 2 by Marc De Groulard, on Flickr

 engine shop by Marc De Groulard, on Flickr

 

 

Union Pacific and Amtrak in Belgium

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Saturday, March 4, 2017 8:55 PM

I did build an engine house once where I made the doors a wee bit too small.  Looked good, though.

 

Ed

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,231 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Saturday, March 4, 2017 6:10 PM

Hello,

Have you looked at the line of Faller / Pola structures. Perhaps you can find a floor plan which includes dimensions?

http://pola-g.de/App/WebObjects/XSeMIPS.woa/cms/page/pid.14.17.89/agid.1131.1182/atid.1688/ecm.at/Zweist%C3%A4ndiger-Lokschuppen-in-Modulbauweise.html

 

There may be more help available at the "Garden Railways" forum which focuses on outdoor large scale models.

http://cs.trains.com/grw/f/91.aspx

 

Regards, Ed

  • Member since
    December 2015
  • From: Shenandoah Valley
  • 9,094 posts
Posted by BigDaddy on Saturday, March 4, 2017 6:04 PM

Welcome to the forum.  Your English is better than my French or Dutch.  This isn't modern, but there is probably more Pola there than here  http://www.onlytrains.com/model/trains/P331750.html

If you are scratch building I would think you would want a scale 1 meter on either side of the engine. 

Henry

COB Potomac & Northern

Shenandoah Valley

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: Edegem, Belgium
  • 35 posts
Modern engine stall
Posted by marctje on Saturday, March 4, 2017 5:12 PM

I'm thinking of making a small layout in G scale with a engine stall as focus. Because i live in Belgium i have no idea what the messurments are for the building and for the sectional door. Can sumbody help me here, please if possible in metric system.

thanks all

Union Pacific and Amtrak in Belgium

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!