Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

" DOUBLE TRACK ATTACK"

2747 views
14 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, October 29, 2016 1:53 PM

 I got it because of too many books and movies. Definitely English/Candaian.

Back to the original topic, the only way to know for sure what will work is to mock it up and test it. And test some more. That's what Crandell meant by "doing recce". You need to test various combinations of locos and cars, especially if you expect to have trains passing on this curve. Sometimes it's not the longest car that has the most overhang, too. The sharper the curve, the greater spacing you need to allow so the trains don't sideswipe. I will tell you that there is zero chance of running full length 80' passenger cars around such a design - I had 30" and 32" radius and still had to add spacing on the curves for such cars. The counter factor is that with sharper curves you normally would b runnign smaller cars, but since so much equipment is designed to work on as low as 18" radius even though it loosk ridiclous, you do need to take into account exactly what you plan to run and not just rely on a guideline number. Set it up on a table top or scrap piece of plywood or something and test - it's the only way to be 100% sure it will work as you expect when you build it in place.

                     --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Saturday, October 29, 2016 1:37 PM

"Recon"

"Recce"

 

Decisions, decisions.

 

Ed

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: west of Portland Oreg.( the city of Roses
  • 599 posts
Posted by TrainsRMe1 on Saturday, October 29, 2016 1:21 PM

Thanks for the info, I just found out that a 20" radius will not work, whan I tried to draw out the lines by using a yard stick, the arc of the radius would go off the my peninsula, so I might have to go for 18", my equipment might look a little off but it should work. what do you think??Confused

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Sebring FL
  • 842 posts
Posted by floridaflyer on Friday, October 28, 2016 1:14 PM

If your 20" curve is your outer curve that means the inner curve will be in the 17/18" range, assuming a track spacing of about 2.5". As has been mentioned, longer cars will have a rather large hangover in the inside track. I would do as Steve suggests, make a template for the 20" radius, scribe that line(which is the centerline of the 20"radius) and then use a compass to scribe the inner curve. tack down both tracks and push some of your longest locos/cars over both to see what happens and how they look.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,797 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Friday, October 28, 2016 12:51 PM

TrainsRMe1:

You can make a tool similar to the one that SouthPenn suggested just by cutting four rail sized grooves in a block of wood. You can make several different blocks with different spacing if you want to. For curves, you will want a bit of play in the grooves so the gauge doesn't bind on the curved rails.

Getting 'realistic' spacing between the tracks may not be practical. Your curves will be much tighter than the prototype so the longer cars will overhang much further than the real thing. Also, if you were to use prototypical spacing in a yard you would not have enough space between side by side cars to retrieve a derailed car unless you were to use tongs or something similar. When the track is too close together in a full yard odds are you will knock more cars off the track when you are trying to fix the first car that derailed.

I will second the suggestion to read the NMRA track spacing recommendations that Steve S posted a link to.

Before anchoring your track permanently you should test your tracks to make sure that your longest cars and locomotives can run on both tracks in opposite directions at the same time without hitting each other.

My 2 Cents

Dave

 

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Friday, October 28, 2016 12:11 PM

Okay, point taken.  As stated, recce is short for reconnaissance, and is pronounced 'WRECK-ee".  Time spent up front getting some important facts limits a lot of pain later.

Thanks, again. Smile

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Friday, October 28, 2016 7:39 AM

selector

Perhaps not many, but I have heard the term used in popular TV for years, so I felt it safe to use.  Thanks for raising the possibility that some may not know what it means.

 

Geez, Crandell, I thought you meant recce as in 'train recce'.  Laugh

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,892 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Friday, October 28, 2016 7:26 AM

I grew up a US Air Force brat and am now up there in years and never heard the slang recce.  I'm guessing it went over a lot of other heads too.   I think the OP wants useful help and advise.  Just a guess anyway.

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Thursday, October 27, 2016 12:27 PM

Perhaps not many, but I have heard the term used in popular TV for years, so I felt it safe to use.  Thanks for raising the possibility that some may not know what it means.

  • Member since
    July 2016
  • From: Cumberland Plateau
  • 393 posts
Posted by CentralGulf on Wednesday, October 26, 2016 4:54 PM

Selector, I wonder how many people who have not been in the military know that recce (pronounced recky) is military slang for reconnaissance? Wink

CG

 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, October 26, 2016 4:34 PM

There's a saying in the military world, at least in the one I joined many years ago (Canadian Armed Forces): "Time spent on recce is seldom wasted."

Meaning look around, see, get some hard facts, move and take another look at the same things for a new perspective.  Learn!

In this case, you have what you need, but have to know how to use it.  Mock up your curves, set them about as far apart, or close, as you feel you need to, and then push AND shove a string of cars, your longest ones, around those curves, both curves occupied at the same time. Look overhead as car corners, pilots, platforms, and other items get close to each other.  Armed with some real facts, you can now create a template out of some scrap plywood.  Cut a strip 1" wide* by 4" long, and mark your track gauge on one side with the minimum distance you have just determined.  That is, you will mark two sets of tracks, two sets of parallel lines with the requisite minimum separation.  Now, use a tool to make two shallow grooves out of those sets of lines.  Invert, and use it as a separation template by sliding it around curves where two tracks are found nested in the curve. 

*I use this for HO curves.  Due to the tighter curves in N scale, perhaps 1.2" wide is better.

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Wednesday, October 26, 2016 3:48 PM

SouthPenn

 

Be sure and read the review towards the bottom.

 

Ed

  • Member since
    March 2015
  • 1,358 posts
Posted by SouthPenn on Wednesday, October 26, 2016 1:35 PM
South Penn
  • Member since
    May 2011
  • 743 posts
Posted by Steven S on Wednesday, October 26, 2016 1:21 PM

Here are the NMRA standards...

http://www.nmra.org/sites/default/files/standards/sandrp/pdf/s-8.pdf

You could make a curved template using poster board that gets placed between the tracks to help keep things properly spaced. 

Steve S

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: west of Portland Oreg.( the city of Roses
  • 599 posts
" DOUBLE TRACK ATTACK"
Posted by TrainsRMe1 on Wednesday, October 26, 2016 1:02 PM

Hey Guys n Gals,

I have a question for you,  I'm  working in Nscale, and I want to lay a double mainline in a curve,  the radii is 20 in. I  want it to look as realistic as possible, what is the best way to measure space between my tracks. Take Care and have a great day.

          Trainsrme1Cool

 

Tags: Nscale Track

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!