Thanks Chuck. More excellent info. I'll play with the easements, as mine are no where near a foot.
Thanx
Steve
Life is tough, but it's tougher if your'e stupid.
The narrow gauge lines in the Western US were built using standard engineering practices, including proper spiral easements. The hurky-jerky ride is more a product of insufficient maintenance than of poor design.
That said, easements for a 35 inch radius could involve a 1/4 inch offset and a total length of about a foot. Even that will change the sudden head-snap to a smooth transition from straight to curve.
My own prototype, the 42 inch gauge JNR, has trains that run at 90mph on some routes. Needless to say, I include appropriate easements (10mm offset, 500mm total length) in my construction.
Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)
Again, we are talking about a narrow gauge line. These were built and maintained on shoestring budgets. Have you ever observed, how bumpy and jerky a ride on a narrow gauge line is? I think that a few bumps and a jerk here and there actually add to the flavor, but beware, this does not mean it should cause derailments.
With those broad curves, the jerk will be mild. There's no operating reason to have them. On the other hand Charlie is right this does improve appearances.
Mike Lehman
Urbana, IL
easements are always beneficial. much smoother transition into the curve so you avoid that "lionel" jerk coming and going from straight track.
Charlie
Guys, my layout is 7x16', and I am running double track around the edges, with 36" radii at the ends.
Should I even be considering an easement into the straight track?