Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Help with Yard design Locked

3800 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2012
  • 2 posts
Help with Yard design
Posted by Haubenschild on Friday, June 22, 2012 11:36 PM
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 23, 2012 2:33 AM

Your browser may have a compatibility issue with the forum software. If you are using IE, check for an icon that looks like a torn piece of paper. It is situated on the upper right corner of your screen. Click it, and you should be able to see your post here.

  • Member since
    June 2012
  • 2 posts
Posted by Haubenschild on Saturday, June 23, 2012 2:26 PM

I am a newbie to model railroading so bear with me.

My layout will be a fictional Southern pacific branch set in the Mojave sub area in the late 60's early 70's. I want a yard that is functional and somewhat realistic , but not too over the top since I am working with limited space. Here is my general drawing

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,797 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Sunday, June 24, 2012 1:16 AM

Haubenschild

Welcome to the forums!

There are several people here who can help you design your layout.

My suggestion is to start by reading John Armstrong's "Track Planning for Realistic Operation". If you are not familiar with Mr. Armstong's work let me say that he was one of the most knowledgeable modelers ever. His book clearly explains how railways work, including yards, and offers many suggestions on how to maximize the use of your available space. You can purchase a copy through our forum hosts by clicking on the "shop" button on the upper right of this page. You can probably find it cheaper on eBay. Just watch out for eBay shipping charges.

I would also offer a second suggestion, although there are many modelers who say that it is not necessary. That suggestion is to get yourself some track planning software. There are freeware sources on the internet. Atlas has one. Others can provide details on what else is available without cost.

I use 3rdPlanIt, which comes at a cost but it has helped me create a workable plan for the space I have available. I started with Atlas's freeware but as I learned more about design I realized that it wasn't giving me the detailed information I wanted. However, even with 3rdPlanIt I first designed a layout with multiple flaws. Some of those were exposed with help from these forums, but John Armstrong's book really gave me an understanding of what I had done wrong in my design and how to fix it. Had I gone ahead with my plan before reading Armstrong's book I would have been sadly disappointed with the layout's functionality, or lack thereof.

Please keep us posted on your progress!

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • From: Michigan
  • 325 posts
Posted by lifeontheranch on Sunday, June 24, 2012 9:53 AM

Designing a layout can be a lot of fun, but.... it can also result in a lot of design errors that later you will regret. Do you know the name Byron Henderson? He owns Layout Vision. His design work is renown. You might consider employing his services to design your yard or even entire layout. For the few dollars spent you will be guaranteed of having a layout that operates correctly and is fun to run trains on. I did and have no regrets.

http://www.layoutvision.com/

 

  • Member since
    February 2009
  • From: Enfield, CT
  • 935 posts
Posted by Doc in CT on Sunday, June 24, 2012 1:02 PM

I'm not sure if you are a subscriber, but your layout reminds me of the THE BENEDICT & WEXFORD which is found in the track plan data base (http://cs.trains.com/TRCCS/forums/t/207352.aspx)

Also, if you have access to a copy, Vol 1 and 2 of John Armstrong's track plans (available as digital downloads or as part of a DVD - better buy) has some smaller "room sized" designs.

Other thought - unless that continuous run loop is critical, you would be better served by a walk-in, around the room type of point to point design.

Co-owner of the proposed CT River Valley RR (HO scale) http://home.comcast.net/~docinct/CTRiverValleyRR/

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: huizen, 15 miles from Amsterdam
  • 1,484 posts
Posted by Paulus Jas on Monday, June 25, 2012 12:55 AM

hi,

the Salinas comes pretty close.

I am not sure about the brand of tracks you have chosen, be careful about what really fits in. With a different brand you could build a layout like the Salinas.

Smile
Paul

  • Member since
    February 2009
  • From: Enfield, CT
  • 935 posts
Posted by Doc in CT on Monday, June 25, 2012 7:57 AM

Co-owner of the proposed CT River Valley RR (HO scale) http://home.comcast.net/~docinct/CTRiverValleyRR/

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • 2,616 posts
Posted by peahrens on Saturday, June 30, 2012 9:46 AM

Welcome.  I spent quite awhile (3 winters) deciding whether to actually build.  I found several reference books worthwhile as mentioned above, plus trying options on track planning software. 

I used (free) XTrackCAD. It has a bit if a learning curve (there is an online tutorial) and a couple of quirks to overcome (you can get answers here or on the yahoo user group).  The software has libraries of various vendors track pieces which you can piece together to see what works for you.  In my case, for instance, I used Walthers-Shinohara turnouts, Atlas crossings, and Walthers-Shinohara curved track as a surrogate for flextrack curves I would lay.  Just to give an idea of how it works.  A search for track planning software will yiels prior threads on folks' preferences for such software (or pencil & paper and zeroxed turnout templates). 

http://www.xtrkcad.org/Wikka/HomePage

Good luck!

Paul

Modeling HO with a transition era UP bent

  • Member since
    May 2007
  • From: East Haddam, CT
  • 3,272 posts
Posted by CTValleyRR on Sunday, July 1, 2012 9:59 AM

Not to hijack your thread, but if you don't want to invest in (or use) a computer-aided design product, you can use the more traditional "by the squares" method.

Take a piece of paper (you can buy engineering tablets ruled in this manner as well) and, using a ruler, draw a 1" x 1" grid on it.  Photocopy this a couple of times so that you have a set of grid sheets where you won't erase the lines.

Assign a scale to each square (usually 12" or 6" work well).  This will help you to get a feel for what will actually fit in a given space.

Now start thinking about what you want your yard to do on your layout.  Is it primarily staging, classification, or a combination of both?  This will help pull your thinking together a little bit.

Connecticut Valley Railroad A Branch of the New York, New Haven, and Hartford

"If you think you can do a thing or think you can't do a thing, you're right." -- Henry Ford

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!