Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

layout height?

4318 views
20 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bethlehem
  • 2 posts
Posted by JimS on Tuesday, January 3, 2012 7:57 PM

I agree on the height suggestions you make, and the mid-'70's passenger equipment request. Both AMTRAK and AutoTrain!

I will be using 36" for my lower level/yard level, about 54" for the middle level and 64" for the top level. The middle level will be the main operating level. The top level won't have much, if any switching. It will mainly be a long mainline run through a river gorge.

I hope this helps.

-Jim S "I reject your reality, and substitute my own." -Mythbusters (and model railroaders!)
  • Member since
    May 2007
  • From: East Haddam, CT
  • 3,272 posts
Posted by CTValleyRR on Tuesday, January 3, 2012 7:19 PM

el-capitan

Grab a piece of plywood that is 36" wide, prop it up, put some trains on it and see what you think at various heights. Make your own decision. There are some questions that can't be answered on a forum.

I'll second that opinion.  Layout height is a very personal thing, so really, the only recommendation possible is "whatever works for you".

El-Capitan's suggestion is spot on.  Rig up a test platform so you can adjust the height (you can use clamps to hold the legs at different heights).  Practice both leaning over it ("Construction" mode), and looking at trains / structures ("Operation" mode).  See what works.  If you have to choose, default to "Operation" mode, because that's where you'll spend most of your time.

FWIW, my track is 48" above the floor, with scenery both higher and lower.

Connecticut Valley Railroad A Branch of the New York, New Haven, and Hartford

"If you think you can do a thing or think you can't do a thing, you're right." -- Henry Ford

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Warren, MI O scaler
  • 553 posts
Posted by el-capitan on Tuesday, January 3, 2012 1:49 PM

Grab a piece of plywood that is 36" wide, prop it up, put some trains on it and see what you think at various heights. Make your own decision. There are some questions that can't be answered on a forum.

 Check out the Deming Sub by clicking on the pics:

Deming Sub Deming Sub

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • 117 posts
Posted by BobH13 on Monday, January 2, 2012 11:45 PM

Just a thought. If the tank is that old maybe you should replace it before it leaks.

  • Member since
    September 2001
  • From: US
  • 5 posts
Posted by markffisch on Monday, January 2, 2012 2:38 PM

Just to add a thought.  My layout will be in the room that I share with the furnace and the oil tank.  A number of neighbors whose houses are the same age and builder have already had to replace a leaking oil tank.  I am planning the height and aisle width to allow for the tank to be removed.  I will probably be able go below for staging along some walls but of course the tank is in the opposite corner of the room from the door.

Mark

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Spanaway, WA
  • 787 posts
Posted by SMassey on Friday, December 16, 2011 2:41 PM

As others have said this is going to depend on you.  I right now have a layout that is mostly 54" high.  This brings it up to my chest and gives me mostly a top of the hill look out.  My layout's deepest shelf is 24" and yes it is best to get to the farther reaches of it using a stool.  This works out best for my situation since I also use the shed as a workshop for my trains and other projects.  It also allows me to store a few items in the shed that I use on a regular basis.  Other layouts I have built have been from 36" to 40" and for table top designs I would not go any higher so I can reach what needs to be reached with out too much trouble.  But that is just me.

 

Massey

A Veteran, whether active duty, retired, national guard, or reserve, is someone who, at one point in his or her life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America" for an amount of "up to and including my life."

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: upstate NY
  • 9,236 posts
Posted by galaxy on Friday, December 16, 2011 1:08 PM

Layout heigth is a personal thing. There is no set standard or routine heigth per NMRA. what works for one guy, may not work for the next.

I am 5'6", and my layout is 36" high, so it is at my high waist and so I DON'T have to bend over much to work/play on it. My bad back can't take a lot of bending over.

You need to select a height that works for you.

Geeked

 

-G .

Just my thoughts, ideas, opinions and experiences. Others may vary.

 HO and N Scale.

After long and careful thought, they have convinced me. I have come to the conclusion that they are right. The aliens did it.

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: huizen, 15 miles from Amsterdam
  • 1,484 posts
Posted by Paulus Jas on Friday, December 16, 2011 3:52 AM

hi,

My impression is quite differently from Tomikawa's. Indeed also this forum is plagued by the "my way is the only way" postings. Most posters however try to explain why they made their choices.

Maybe we should look again to the awesome layout by Mike Danneman in the December MR magazine. The helicopter views, seeing two trains twisting through his amazing mountain scenes. Or eye-level scenes like the highway 72 overpass or pulling the empty hopper in Plainview.

Since i prefer to walk with my train to really enjoy all the different scenes, I have a planning problem. Having eye-level views and helicopter views at the very same time seems impossible. Not sure about it, if Mike's layout was just  Denver Downtown (behind Centennial School Supply Co) he would have probably built that part much higher. To be still able to watch his 20 inches higher mountain scenes he would have needed stairs.   

In an other thread about view-blocks, the OP is running 16 feet long trains. Stepping back is often impossible, those narrow aisles again, which makes seeing the whole train at one time an illusion. A helicopter view could be the answer.

My layout is not longer then 11 feet, but build in an attic. Every foot higher means a two feet shorter layout. Though I would love to have my smallish layout  with narrow 12"  to 18" wide shelves, at almost armpit level (53"), I settled for 45". 

BTW easy (un)coupling beside shelf-width is influencing layout height as well.

Tough choices

Paul

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Potomac Yard
  • 2,767 posts
Posted by NittanyLion on Thursday, December 15, 2011 8:13 PM

My last layout was a very specific, but slightly odd height: 40 and 7/16ths inches to the top of the roadbed.

3/16in for the roadbed.

3/4 inch for subroadbed.

39.5 inches legs (it was a sectional layout) because that's how long the steel meter stick I used to measure out the legs was from end to end.  Repeatably in the leg production was more important to me than anything else.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Thursday, December 15, 2011 7:50 PM

Howdy, Bre'r Bear,

If your old height, 48 inches, was too high, then try 42 inches.  I've always found that a good height, but then, I'm not very tall (nor am I very flexible.)

I've been drawing one impression from all the previous posts, which may or may not be accurate.  The posters all seem to reference a layout height as the only height for a given layout.  Without going to separate levels, I have about twenty inches of vertical offset between the depths of the Netherworld and the big colliery at the high end of the Tomikawa Tani Tetsudo.  If I had started at four feet I would have to operate the highest level like Gunther Prein (Up periscope!  Jawohl, Herr Kapitan!)  Thanks, but I prefer U-boats built by GE, not Krupp...

Operating height is one thing.  Construction height is another.  Working at an uncomfortably low height can get old in a hurry, but high level work can be done from a stepstool, a ladder or even drywaller's stilts.  As far as making things high enough to work under, I don't find it necessary to get under the benchwork (except to search for dropped parts.)  I brought all of my electricals out to the edge of the benchwork, and installed all of my switch machines there, too.  That frees up all of that under-layout cubic for organized storage (in plastic totes or wheeled cabinets that double as worktops.)

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Thursday, December 15, 2011 6:31 PM

I'm another one at 50". 

Two layouts ago I had 58" which was too high for working on without a stool.  Also, I couldn't easily see what was behind the first occupied track.  Last layout and current layout under construction were and are at 50".  I find this to be good combination for me at 5'11".  I can also work at a desk underneath.

Enjoy

Paul

If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Central Vermont
  • 4,565 posts
Posted by cowman on Thursday, December 15, 2011 6:18 PM

As stated, the "right height" for you depends on a number of factors. 

My plan is to have the layout at a height that will be about chest level when sitting on a stool for viewing and most operating.  When I stand I will be able to reach over scenery and work on things better than I could if the layout was at chest height.

Good luck,

Richard

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • From: The place where I come from is a small town. They think so small, they use small words.
  • 1,141 posts
Posted by twcenterprises on Thursday, December 15, 2011 6:06 PM

Mine's at 42", currently a 4x8 but soon to expand to fit available space.  I generally sit and watch 'em roll, and this puts everything pretty close to eye level to me.  When switching, it's low enough I can easily reach over to uncouple cars, etc.  Having 2 kids, this is a reasonable height for them to see, but not be able to reach everything.  Planned staging (for the expansion) will be about 36" high.

EMD - Every Model Different

ALCO - Always Leaking Coolant and Oil

CSX - Coal Spilling eXperts

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: Colorado
  • 4,075 posts
Posted by fwright on Thursday, December 15, 2011 6:00 PM

I built a Lionel layout at 36" high for the kids.  I found that to be an awkaward height for me.  Gave me backaches reaching over to work on it, and was not all that pleasant to wire underneath, either.

Built a 4x6 HO home layout at 60" to go over top a computer work station.  That was too high to work on, and the fascia just felt too high.  Moved it down to 55", which was somewhat better, but still needed a stool to work on.

Was part of a Free-mo setup a few weeks ago.  Rail height is a nominal 50".  Great viewing perspective, and thoroughly enjoyed operations at that height.

just my experiences

Fred W

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Thursday, December 15, 2011 5:48 PM

It depends on many factors.  How tall you are, how far you need to be able to reach into it, how tall the shortest potential operator or viewer will be, and the angle from which you wish to view it.

Mine is 40" to the average rail head.

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,280 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Thursday, December 15, 2011 5:21 PM

bear's lair

the bench work is 36" wide all around the layout that is 17 feet long  on both sides and 9 feet across at the ends its built like a square box with a lift out section to assess the center.

My layout is somewhat similar and the height is 36 inches.  That works.  I am 6 feet tall.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: ontario canada
  • 69 posts
Posted by bear's lair on Thursday, December 15, 2011 5:15 PM

the bench work is 36" wide all around the layout that is 17 feet long  on both sides and 9 feet across at the ends its built like a square box with a lift out section to assess the center.

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Thursday, December 15, 2011 5:14 PM

Bear,

Four feet high doesn't seem that high at all, imho.

Go with what is your most comfortable view, based on the height that you are if you're sitting in your chair or if you run trains standing up. 

My shelf layout is 55" (which is my chest height when standing) for two reasons.

1. It had to run over my desk and book case.

2. I wanted more of a closer-to-ground view instead of the traditional "helicopter height" that most modelers view their layouts from.

I got the idea from former forum member "Driline".  Here's a photo of his layout.  Hopefully he doesn't mind me posting it here.  I think he did an excellent job.

 

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Thursday, December 15, 2011 5:08 PM

It's really impossible to answer. Someone 5' tall will probably want a lower layout than someone 6' tall. Someone with very wide benchwork may want the layout lower to allow a further reach in to work on scenery or rerail a car - someone with a layout built on a 12" shelf may want the layout up near eye level.

In my case, I found I like the benchwork a little lower on my new layout than I had it on the old one - easier to see stuff thru the lower part of my new bifocals!!

Cool

Stix
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,280 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Thursday, December 15, 2011 5:06 PM

A lot of us are at a 36 inch height.

A good compromise between 3 feet and 4 feet would be 42 inches, of course.

At 42 inches, a 6-foot tall individual should be able to sit on the floor under the layout without hitting his head on the underside of the layout while working on wiring, etc.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: ontario canada
  • 69 posts
layout height?
Posted by bear's lair on Thursday, December 15, 2011 4:53 PM

I have moved and need to re assemble the layout. My question is at what height is recommended?  I had it at four foot before and it seemed a bit high. Any suggestions would be great Thanks Bear.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!