Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

To those Modelers using traditional CC/WB card system for layout OP

2969 views
13 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2010
  • 245 posts
To those Modelers using traditional CC/WB card system for layout OP
Posted by papasmurf on Thursday, August 4, 2011 12:06 PM

Am in HO.  Wanted to obtain some input on how you folks set up your NO frills Operation system,  using traditional CCs, WBs, any peripherals necessary. How you stored packets, cards, waybills/ fascia box types/ card codes chosen( overflow, awaiting spot, spotted, unloading, on hold, awaiting pickup, bad order, etc. ).   I Know there's a TON of writeups on this but it don't hoit  to ask/ get some expert advice here, on a more personal basis!

 Getting closer to actually having something up & running.  Pondering CC/ WB card-type ( not pc-generated ) for 4 transition era diesels, 50 cars, tops. Layout's in-progress on my small sunporch as a-t-r, point-to-point, narrow shelf, w/ reverse loop at elevated end; mini-yard at low end, where cars to be shunted on/ off portable staging cart.  Main to be twice-around, w/ swing bridge spanning doorway. Seriously doubt three times around would fit well or look right ( ' spaghetti bowl ' ). Hope to have total of 5 - 7 industries. Will scenic very well, to make it look prototypical!   Planned so far: IND.# 1 - coal -oil dealer on twin track levels/  REA warehouse, as have kit & several REA vehicles/  Team Track at village station/  feed-grain mill, as have nice stone mill kit with operating waterwheel/  small commercial bakery.  List of other possible choices:  small brickyard/  sand & gravel pit/  small  sawmill-lumber yard/   firetruck restoration facility/  Diamond Match plant/  small concrete batch plant.  Modeler's License, Selective Compression on any Industry/ structure size; used as needed.  Am still thinking..... DECISIONS, DECISIONS!   Thank You All in Advance for any suggestions/ advice. TTFN.....Old Tom aka papasmurf in NH

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Thursday, August 4, 2011 12:29 PM

This long thread from quite a while back includes a lot of information about CC&WB along with many other operating ideas:

http://cs.trains.com/TRCCS/forums/t/46614.aspx

 

papasmurf
How you stored packets, cards, waybills/ fascia box types/ card codes chosen( overflow, awaiting spot, spotted, unloading, on hold, awaiting pickup, bad order, etc. ).  

All that complication is certainly not needed to begin, or ever. One car card box per track or industry is plenty. When the operator looks at the waybill, he'll see if the destination listed is for the track it's sitting on or somewhere else. If it's for the track where the car is sitting, leave it. If it's for somewhere else, handle the car in accordance with the train instructions.

It would be a huge help to you to operate (even once) somewhere that is already using CC&WB. Then you'll see how easy it actually is and how unnecessarily complicated some folks can make it (especially those posting on forums who have themselves never actually used the system).

The Operations SIG site is loaded with good information. An OpSIG membership will open the door to you to operating on others' layouts. Seven bucks per year.

Byron

 

Tags: Waybills
  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,455 posts
Posted by wp8thsub on Thursday, August 4, 2011 1:30 PM

papasmurf

Am in HO.  Wanted to obtain some input on how you folks set up your NO frills Operation system,  using traditional CCs, WBs, any peripherals necessary. How you stored packets, cards, waybills/ fascia box types/ card codes chosen( overflow, awaiting spot, spotted, unloading, on hold, awaiting pickup, bad order, etc. ).   

The boxes/peripherals can be kept pretty simple.  I like using a separate box for each yard track and industry.  I don't employ the "setout/hold/pickup" boxes that many others still use.  In addition, I like to provide sorting "shelves" for packets and cars in the process of being switched so the paperwork can stay off the scenery.  An article on one of my old layouts shows this type of organizer at work here http://www.trainlife.com/magazines/pages/418/30684/june-1996-page-42 .  A different article on this same layout also appeared in MR in the June, 1997 issue, but had no photos of such things, so I hope posting the link above is OK here.

Getting closer to actually having something up & running.  Pondering CC/ WB card-type ( not pc-generated ) for 4 transition era diesels, 50 cars, tops. Layout's in-progress...

The CC/WB materials from Micro Mark are pretty decent, so you could try those.  They're available in pads of 100 (scroll down the page to find them) http://www.micromark.com/More-Model-Railroad-Items.html .

Your layout design and chosen industries are mostly immaterial to how the billing is set up.  The basic idea is the same for any layout.  Figure out what cars you want to direct to and from which industries, maybe have some through traffic that's not billed to any modeled customer (I have a lot of those), and develop procedures for the trains to be used for moving the traffic. 

Car billing seems to be less of a problem on layouts than haphazard ideas for moving the trains.  A lot of modelers have no clue how a railroad works and can't quite figure out sensible instructions for crews to do their jobs.  There's a lot of local freight orientation out there to the exclusion of understanding how cars move to or from the yards or towns modeled on the layout. 

Byron offers sound advice on attending some op sessions to see how everything works in practice.  I will add that not every operating layout is a good example to emulate, so I hope you can find one or more where the operations are well thought out.  Every layout owner does things a bit differently too, so the more sessions you can attend the better.  If your layout design isn't final yet, operating before you finish building it will benefit you greatly, as you'll likely find fewer things to add or tear out in the name of improving operations.

Rob Spangler

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: On the Banks of the Great Choptank
  • 2,916 posts
Posted by wm3798 on Thursday, August 4, 2011 3:24 PM

I'm cheap, so I haven't purchased any of the pre-fab stuff.  I use 3x5 index cards for car cards, folded to make a pocket, then stripped together with Avery labels that I print from my roster.  I set up a simple word document to print out waybills, flipping the sheet over so 1 and 2 are one side, and 3 and 4 are on the other.  They're about the size of a business card.  You can print them on business card stock, or just on plain paper and trim them with a paper cutter.

I picked up some acrylic display pieces at a second hand store which have worked well as card racks, especially at my yard...

I have the track numbers marked in permanent marker, but the destination labels are in dry erase, so I can be flexible in designating the tracks during classification.  The clear box makes it easy to see what the last car in each track should be.

Very cost effective, and easy to use.

Lee

Route of the Alpha Jets  www.wmrywesternlines.net

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,455 posts
Posted by wp8thsub on Thursday, August 4, 2011 3:34 PM

wm3798

I have the track numbers marked in permanent marker, but the destination labels are in dry erase, so I can be flexible in designating the tracks during classification. 

That's another good concept to consider.  Having a yard track tied to a specific destination/block is often too rigid.  I made some laminated block ID cards that are taller than the car cards.  The yard crew can easily shift these around between tracks as needed to help identify which block of cars is where. 

Rob Spangler

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • 245 posts
Posted by papasmurf on Thursday, August 4, 2011 3:48 PM

THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH FOR ANSWERING THIS OLD GEEZER'S REQUEST!    Have always suspected that, being human, t' is easy to over-complicate use of any simple system. Many folks do just that, causing frustation along the r-o-w (pun). Had whole set of small, manila CC envelopes w/ WB inserts I'd saved from years ago, from our old, defunct HO modular club.  Dumped entire lot, as road name, industry names don't match anything am doing now. Anyway, it's nice to start with a 'clean slate' and make all new goof-ups, ROFL!   WILL do some 'dry runs', as suggested, when at least two industries are in-place. This will help me become familiar with the ins & outs of OP, instead of arm-chairing.  And, if either of the 2 HO clubs around here use Operation, will check that out and ask if I might attend a meeting.  If I need any more help, you'll surely hear from me again!   Keep Your Rails Shiny.......Old Tom aka papaHOsmurf in NH

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: US
  • 973 posts
Posted by jmbjmb on Thursday, August 4, 2011 10:30 PM

I will take a different tack from others.  Given how you described your layout and the small number of industries, let me ask if your interest is in the paperwork or in switching cars?  I have a similar small layout now, but over the years I have tried an version of car cards, a totally computer generated switch list, but now I'm seriously considering going back to CCT for this layout.  Or some version of tab on car forwarding.  On my small layout cars are either headed toward one of the few industries/team track or they are headed toward the junction yard to be fiddled off.  Simple rule set:  When  car is fiddled on, it get's a CCT.  Cars at sidings with a CCT still on are either being loaded or unloaded and stay in place (or have to be returned to that spot).  Cars without a CCT are pickups for delivery to the junction and the rest of the world.  Doesn't really matter if the car is loaded or empty or what the destination is.  I'll have done my shift so to speak and the road crew (0-5-0) takes over.  Somehow magically the next shift, those cars are gone and new ones are there.  Wonder what happens during the night?

This also means I don't have to worry about painting or reading car numbers from a distance (+1 as the eyeballs get older).  Now I know there are many out there for whom the waybill and concept of the car having a load and destination is part of the fun, but I'm not into the paperwork.

 

jim

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Friday, August 5, 2011 8:15 AM

What's a "CCT"?

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Sorumsand, Norway
  • 3,417 posts
Posted by steinjr on Friday, August 5, 2011 4:41 PM

dehusman

What's a "CCT"?

 From context, probably a cutesy way of saying "color coded thumbtack" or some such thing.

 Smile,
 Stein

 

 

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: US
  • 973 posts
Posted by jmbjmb on Friday, August 5, 2011 10:20 PM

Now you're making me feel obsolete.  Yes, it's for Color Coded Tack, but no more cutsey than CC/WB.  In fact not to many years ago the term CCT would be used routinely in MR and everyone knew what it meant.  I was proposing an alternate that was common a few years ago. 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Friday, August 5, 2011 11:30 PM

Yikes! Been reading this and all those links from 05. I'm getting dizzy. I know I need something like this on my layout but my head is close to exploding, better slowely approach this as the layout progresses.

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Sorumsand, Norway
  • 3,417 posts
Posted by steinjr on Saturday, August 6, 2011 2:10 AM

jmbjmb

Now you're making me feel obsolete.  Yes, it's for Color Coded Tack, but no more cutsey than CC/WB.  In fact not to many years ago the term CCT would be used routinely in MR and everyone knew what it meant.  I was proposing an alternate that was common a few years ago. 

 Sorry - "cutesy" was probably a poor choice of word on my behalf.  It is generally a good idea to spell out abbreviations for model railroading terms in full the first time they are used in a thread. At least if the goal is to communicate :-)

 By the way - I suspect that "a few years" may be a pretty relative concept. 

 I feel like it was just a few years ago that my wife and I had this tiny little baby boy who would lie on my chest and sleep while I sat in a comfy chair watching TV with the sound off, listening to him breathing softly.

 Now we suddenly have this tall, gangly, slightly shaggy looking youth roaming around the house, getting taller than his mom and approaching my height, sometimes rolling his eyes and mumbling something under his breath about old geezers ;-)

 Grin,
 Stein

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Saturday, August 6, 2011 11:41 AM

jmbjmb

Now you're making me feel obsolete.  Yes, it's for Color Coded Tack, but no more cutsey than CC/WB.  In fact not to many years ago the term CCT would be used routinely in MR and everyone knew what it meant.  I was proposing an alternate that was common a few years ago. 

Its is still used today but hasn't really been in the model press very much for the last 20-30 years. 

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • 245 posts
Posted by papasmurf on Sunday, August 7, 2011 4:51 PM

HI JIM:  Am beginning to lean toward your way of thinking and plan to try several OP methods/ systems; stick with what works best for me during the testing. TTFN....papaHOsmurf in NH

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!