Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

quarry track plan discussion

9589 views
19 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Central Georgia
  • 921 posts
Posted by Johnnny_reb on Monday, March 7, 2011 9:29 PM

Best one so far. And yes all rock/sand quarries sell different grades of rock/sand.

Paulus Jas

hi

http://i989.photobucket.com/albums/af19/Paulus_Jas/QUARRY3.jpg

not so much different.

Smile

Paul

Johnnny_reb Once a word is spoken it can not be unspoken!

My Train Page   My Photobucket Page   My YouTube Channel

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Saskatchewan
  • 2,201 posts
Posted by last mountain & eastern hogger on Monday, March 7, 2011 11:13 AM

Whistling

Well if it were mine, and the way I like to operate in this scerino, I would definately like to have the "crusher/loader" track connected to the" quarry entry" lead. That way you can do all your work from one end of your locomotive.

I know, I know,  This is only my My 2 Cents worth.

Looking forward to see how it goes for you........

Johnboy out.................................and looking for the Guy that knows everything.

from Saskatchewan, in the Great White North.. 

We have met the enemy,  and he is us............ (Pogo)

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: huizen, 15 miles from Amsterdam
  • 1,484 posts
Posted by Paulus Jas on Sunday, March 6, 2011 8:31 AM

hi

not so much different.

Smile

Paul

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • 72 posts
Posted by soller on Sunday, March 6, 2011 7:59 AM

Hi Paulus!

Yes, I have been thinking of adding a runaround but I don't know what is the best place to it. I think if I add a runaround I limit the storage of cars in a track. Remember I have only 2x9.

http://i1093.photobucket.com/albums/i432/mallo1/quarryrunaround.jpg

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: huizen, 15 miles from Amsterdam
  • 1,484 posts
Posted by Paulus Jas on Sunday, March 6, 2011 7:01 AM

hi Soller

i would add a runaround track and a cassette to your plan. With facing and trailing spurs you will need one.

And i would try to find out if quarries produce different grades of gravel or sand, so you can have more dedicated loading points.

Smile
paul

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • 72 posts
Posted by soller on Sunday, March 6, 2011 6:56 AM

No, the wheel loader track is not the mainline. I have only 2X9 space so in the future the entry to the quarry might be connected to the mainline with a switch.

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: Boonville, In
  • 193 posts
Posted by B&O SteamDemon on Sunday, March 6, 2011 6:20 AM

soller

Hi!

Yes, the quarry is the entire layout and my goal is to get operating interest. These weeks I have been searching info about quarries in the internet and building a crusher/loader kit from Walthers. My idea is to model a quarry with 2 loading tracks, one for a front  wheel loader and the other for the crusher/loader kit.  This is my new track plan:

[View:http://cs.trains.com/TRCCS/themes/trc/utility/http://i1093.photobucket.com/albums/i432/mallo1/agquarry.jpg:550:0]

Looking at your plan, I see you are using a simple push/pull idea with the switcher, now is the wheel loader track also the mainline?  Or do you plan to feature a mainline that might have a switch to access the quarry?

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • 72 posts
Posted by soller on Sunday, March 6, 2011 6:09 AM

Hi!

Yes, the quarry is the entire layout and my goal is to get operating interest. These weeks I have been searching info about quarries in the internet and building a crusher/loader kit from Walthers. My idea is to model a quarry with 2 loading tracks, one for a front  wheel loader and the other for the crusher/loader kit.  This is my new track plan:

[View:http://cs.trains.com/TRCCS/themes/trc/utility/:550:0]

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Sorumsand, Norway
  • 3,417 posts
Posted by steinjr on Tuesday, February 22, 2011 12:52 AM

Hamltnblue

Sometimes a simple siding is all that is needed. There are plenty of quarries that are small businesses.

 Beautiful and realistic looking scene.

 

 No doubt one can make a good looking industry scene out of a quarry. Here are some real life pics of a Norwegian gravel pit (Svene pukkverk on the Numedal line in South Central Norway) - the track is essentially a double ended siding under a loader:

http://www.jernbane.net/db/dispenhet.asp?enhet=1717&kat=Stasjoner&katID=5

 One of the engines used to pull cars through the loader is a Di3 - essentially a Swedish built variant of an EMD F7, with cabs at both ends of the locomotive

 But I think the core problem here is that the OP apparently wants the quarry to be his entire layout, and that he wants interesting switching to keep his attention for a long time.Pushing a cut of cars into one track, and pulling a second cut of cars from another track, while looking like a realistic scene, is not likely to offer a lot in the way of operating interest.

 So I guess the OP should define what his primary goal is - to create a great looking scene or to have quite a bit of switching.

 If his goal is to mainly concentrate on modeling the scenery, I would suggest doing a tri-fork layout - stem and three tines. One tine is a hidden track along the wall - this is where the train comes from, pulling empty cars.

 Then two visible tracks - one for loaded cars, one for empty cars. Removable switching lead off one end of the layout. Train arrives from hiding, stops on main (behind scene), uncouples cars.

 Moves forward, backs in, couples to loads under loader, pulls forward, spots loads on a second track.

 Back to main, couple onto inbound empties, pull forward, shoves empties in under loader, uncouples.

 Gets loads, back to main, and then backs up into staging again.

 Not an extreme amount of interest, but some.

 Could be made more complex by having different loading tracks for different products (like sand loaded from a tower on one track, gravel loaded from front loaders on a second track), so inbound cuts had to be split among several tracks.

 It certainly is possible to work something out here. But it takes a decision on what the main focus is - to get a realistic looking scene (i.e. KISS), or to get operating interest.

 Mmm - it is also possible to model the other end of the cars journey - a place that receives cars of gravel and sand. Those types of places can also receive other stuff.  Somewhere (prototype forum?) I know I posted a track schematic of such a place from somewhere in Wisconsin (I think), but I can't find that right now.

 Anyways - lots of options. But if if the gravel pit is going to be the entire layout (instead of a smaller scene on a larger layout), it would take some thinking about what the OP really wants to model.

 Smile,
 Stein

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • 1 posts
Posted by Photogdad on Monday, February 21, 2011 11:42 PM

Please keep us posted. i'd like to see the out come of your layout. I'm tight on space myself , 6x6 "L" shape but I'm hoping to expand. However I'm still in the planning and sketching phase. Good luck to ya.

 

Charles

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Monday, February 21, 2011 4:45 PM

Sometimes a simple siding is all that is needed. There are plenty of quarries that are small businesses.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: huizen, 15 miles from Amsterdam
  • 1,484 posts
Posted by Paulus Jas on Monday, February 21, 2011 4:11 PM

hi Soller,

The trick is to build a situation with more then one industry.

This plan was from Stein.

 

Paul

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Sorumsand, Norway
  • 3,417 posts
Posted by steinjr on Monday, February 21, 2011 3:49 PM

soller

My idea is pulling empty cars from staging yard and backing them into the empties track. Uncouple the empties and couple the loaded cars. An industry switcher picks the empties from the empties track and moves them to the crusher/loader zone.

 Not unless your industry switcher stays on the loading track, trapped by the loads.

 

soller

I know it's a basic track plan but my space is only 2x9. I want to operate this layout for a long time, keeping the interest  but it's difficult to design a layout with lack of space

 Not really. 2x9 feet is plenty of space for a switching layout. A handful of H0 scale examples smaller than 2x9 feet:

 An 8 foot town with a removable 3 foot extension:

 

8 foot yard, add a 3-4 foot removable switching lead:

An 8 foot self contained switching plan:

 

A 7 foot self contained switching plan:

 

A nine foot switching plan, based on a plan by Byron Henderson:

 

An 8 foot track plan based on a plan by "Shortliner" Jack Trollope:

 

A nine foot plan:

A seven foot plan, needs a 3-4 foot removable switching lead to the right:

 

A 6 1/2 foot self contained switching layout

 

If you are looking at small track plans with aggregates handling, have a look at Chris Nevard's layouts over in the UK : http://www.nevard.com/

 E.g. his 3 x 2 foot Arne Wharf: http://www.nevardmedia5.fotopic.net/c112122.html

Or his 5 foot "Cement Quay" (6 feet with staging): http://www.nevardmedia5.fotopic.net/show_group.php?id=4544

There are tons of ways to fit a H0 scale switching layout into 9 feet of length :-)

Smile,
Stein

 

 

 

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • 72 posts
Posted by soller on Monday, February 21, 2011 2:52 PM

My idea is pulling empty cars from staging yard and backing them into the empties track. Uncouple the empties and couple the loaded cars. An industry switcher picks the empties from the empties track and moves them to the crusher/loader zone.

I know it's a basic track plan but my space is only 2x9. I want to operate this layout for a long time, keeping the interest  but it's difficult to design a layout with lack of space

Need inspiration!

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Sorumsand, Norway
  • 3,417 posts
Posted by steinjr on Sunday, February 20, 2011 4:05 AM

soller

The curve is to connect to a staging yard. Maybe a future expansion. Now it is the entry to the quarry.

I don't use use a passing siding in the empties track  because the engine goes backward.

 If your plan is to first come in from staging pulling empties, and backing the empties into the empties track, uncoupling the cars there, and then go up and pull loaded cars from the load track, and depart with the loads, then it would work.

 But the way you have things set up now, an engine (either the road engine or an industry switcher) will not be able to move cars from the empties track to one of the loading tracks, or the other way around, without having to leave the engine trapped at the inner end of one of the tracks, since you have no way of getting the engine to the other end of the cut of cars.

 Usually quarry tracks are fairly simple -  a quarry would be more of a scenic feature than a switching puzzle.

 It could be modeled as a single ended spur where an engine can back into the track, couple to loaded outbound cars and pull them out of the track, leaving them on the main or on a siding for a moment, and then having the engine shove empty cars into the spur and leave them there to be loaded, before going back to grab the outbound cars and depart with them.

 Or having some small industry engine pull cars slowly up to a loading point, wait until they are loaded, and then pull forward to the next car, wait until that is loaded, pull forward to the third car and so on and so forth, leaving a cut of loaded cars for the bigger railroad to pick up and take elsewhere.

 A loading track can also be along a double ended siding off the main track - in which case the train can pull through a loader, and when all cars are loaded, the engine can be uncoupled, run around the cars and coupled to the other end, a brake test, and off you go, heading back in the opposite direction.

 Off hand, your track plan does not seem sensible. But tell us about how you plan to run your trains, and how cars are supposed to get from the empties track to the load tracks, and we can tell you if it makes sense.

Smile,
Stein

 

 

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: huizen, 15 miles from Amsterdam
  • 1,484 posts
Posted by Paulus Jas on Sunday, February 20, 2011 2:22 AM

hi,

you have facing and trailing spurs. It has nothing to do with running forwards or backwards, but with pushing or pulling a cut of cars.  Either way or your loading tracks or your empties track are impossible to reach.

http://www.chipengelmann.com/trains/Beginner/Runaround.html

Unless you have a passing siding in the staging yard, or place some cars before the engine and others behind it by hand.  Without knowing more a discusion is fruitless. Imagine your engine pushing a cut of empties from staging, replacing them for loaded cars. Extra empties are temporarely parked on the empties track, trapping your engine.

have fun

Paul

 

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • 72 posts
Posted by soller on Sunday, February 20, 2011 2:00 AM

The curve is to connect to a staging yard. Maybe a future expansion. Now it is the entry to the quarry.

I don't use use a passing siding in the empties track  because the engine goes backward.

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: huizen, 15 miles from Amsterdam
  • 1,484 posts
Posted by Paulus Jas on Saturday, February 19, 2011 10:19 AM

hi,

a pretty simple design, some questions related to how you want to operate the quarry sidings.

BTW your design is 9 ft long, not 8.

I have the feeling a lot more could be done in your space; but i do not know all the possibilities in a quarry. It is up to you to make it visible for a follower like me

smile

Paul

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • 6 posts
Posted by concretepumper on Saturday, February 19, 2011 9:27 AM

Awesome! Keep us posted. I used to work in a Quarry and would like to model a modern Rock & Sand operation. I am currently working on a mountain area to look like Calico Ghost town.

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • 72 posts
quarry track plan discussion
Posted by soller on Saturday, February 19, 2011 9:20 AM

I want to build a 2x8 shelf layout based on railroad operations in an aggregates quarry. I model in H0 scale and my minimus curve radius is 24". Track is atlas code 83 and #6 turnouts. This is my basic track plan:

 

http://img594.imageshack.us/i/quarryy.jpg/

Any advice?

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!