Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Track spacing

2104 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • 2,751 posts
Posted by Allegheny2-6-6-6 on Friday, August 20, 2010 8:24 AM

 The NMRA standard is always a good way to keep form having any problems but what really determines the space you need between tracks on curves more so then the radius of the curve is the length of the rolling stock and locomotive in some cases. For example an 85' heavy weight passenger car will have more swing to it then lets say a 40' box car. another factor is the type of coupler mounting  Talgo or truck mounted couplers although not prototypical will have less swing then body mounted couplers.In regard to locomotive longer engines such as big articulates like Big Boys or Mallets even though because of their articulation are able to negotiate tighter curves the trade off is more "cab overhang" I call it. So care needs to be taken how close you place things like sign and telephone poles etc. in relation to the tracks. On something like a 4-8-4 you will have much less cab over hang but require a larger radius curve .This isn't much of an issue with diesel locomotives with the exception of the curve radius when it comes to big 6 axle road engines. Over hang is never an issue with a diesel.

If you don't own one already pick yourself up an NMRA gage , this will definitely be helpful with spacing track as well as numerous other tasks.

Just my 2 cents worth, I spent the rest on trains. If you choked a Smurf what color would he turn?
  • Member since
    December 2009
  • From: San Bernardino Sub / Cajon Pass
  • 102 posts
Posted by RiversideBNSF on Friday, August 20, 2010 2:44 AM

I asked the same question a few weeks ago, and I think this is the most popular question on the forums. I followed my fellow modelers advice and used 2 1/2" on the main line and 2" in the yards. It worked out great after the ballast was spread and is very prototypical looking.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Thursday, August 19, 2010 6:28 PM

The NMRA track-to-track standards are a good place to start

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Central Vermont
  • 4,565 posts
Posted by cowman on Thursday, August 19, 2010 6:24 PM

Welcome to the forums.

2" on a straight is "normal" though you will find variations.  On curves it depends on how sharp your curves are and how long your rolling stock is.  Yard spacing can be closer, BUT, if you have to rerail and fiddle cars, put a few pieces of track on the table and see how big your fingers are.

Good luck,

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: CT
  • 80 posts
Posted by Chessie Sys. 3022 on Thursday, August 19, 2010 6:21 PM

 I think usually 2" is a good general measurement.

Modeling New Haven despite what his user name says...

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • 1 posts
Track spacing
Posted by Ed Fizz on Thursday, August 19, 2010 6:18 PM

I am palnning a very simple HO shelf layout around my rec room. Two parallel tracks only. How close together (from centre of track) should the tracks be? I had it written down but can't find my notes. Thanks.

Freelance inspired by CP Rail, Cartier Subdivision, late 70s/earley 80s.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!