Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

What height should "make do" guardrails be for Atlas code 100 Turnouts?

1106 views
4 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 5,449 posts
What height should "make do" guardrails be for Atlas code 100 Turnouts?
Posted by mobilman44 on Saturday, July 4, 2009 2:24 PM

Hi,

I'm finishing up the lower level staging area of my HO layout and have 6 Atlas #6 code 100 turnouts that I want to make "bulletproof".  I have taken the edge off the points, checked gauge and smoothness and made track going into the turnouts as best I can.  During testing I have had very few derailments, and those I've had are probably more due to tender weight or operator "error".

It was suggested that I put in lengths of strip styrene to act as extended guardrails to give extra insurance.  As they will be relatively out of sight, I have no problem using styrene (as opposed to rail), but am a bit unsure as to the size.  I've got some .100x.100 and that appears to be workable, but I would like your input on this before I do it. 

What are your thoughts on this, and how high should the "guardrails" be as compared to the railhead?

Thanks,

Mobilman44

ENJOY  !

 

Mobilman44

 

Living in southeast Texas, formerly modeling the "postwar" Santa Fe and Illinois Central 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3,312 posts
Posted by locoi1sa on Saturday, July 4, 2009 3:11 PM

   I don't have any Atlas turnouts but on my Pecos I have shimmed the guard rails with .015 x .250 and trimmed it the same height as he rail head. Unless you plan on running proto 87 wheels make your flange ways according to the NMRA flange gauge.

   Pete

 I pray every day I break even, Cause I can really use the money!

 I started with nothing and still have most of it left!

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Sunday, July 5, 2009 2:56 AM

Your .100" square strip is the same height as Atlas Code 100 rail, so it should be satisfactory as 'added point protection.'  You might have to do some creative shaping to clear the built-in spikes and tie plates.

Don't forget to check both gauge and flangeway clearance with your handy NMRA gauge.

On the few turnouts I have protected with added guardrails in advance of the points I simply used pieces of Code 100 rail.  Of course, the turnouts are hand-laid, but those guard rails are mostly located on flex track ties.

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 5,449 posts
Posted by mobilman44 on Sunday, July 5, 2009 7:35 AM

Thank you!

My previous HO layout of 14 years had very few derailments - almost all due to operator or equipment error (hanging coupler hose).  However, my motive power was mostly first generation diesels, which are typically very reliable.  I had a couple of steamers but nothing of size.  It was also a DC layout.

This DCC layout will also have first generation diesels, but several steamers as well.  And frankly, the long wheelbase steamers (2-10-2 and the like) are much more finicky of "creative trackwork".  They will find any problems for sure!

That being said, the sights and sounds of the steam locos make all the effort worthwhile!

Mobilman44

ENJOY  !

 

Mobilman44

 

Living in southeast Texas, formerly modeling the "postwar" Santa Fe and Illinois Central 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!