Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

joint compound vs plaster

6169 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2008
  • 12 posts
Posted by BillW on Monday, March 9, 2009 8:19 PM

 

I would opt for plaster of paris or Sculptamold.  Both of these products lend themselves to carving.  They also set up a lot faster.
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Utica, OH
  • 4,000 posts
Posted by jecorbett on Monday, March 9, 2009 10:41 AM

TBat55

I used Joint Compound too thick, and it cracked (a lot).  It's also very, very heavy compared to plaster and lightweight Hydrocal.  I had to add another leg just to support the weight.

I use powdered joint compound which comes in a bag and is mixed with water just like plaster. Its advantage is it has a much longer working time. It comes in various setting times and I use the 90 minute type. I can mix it thin or thick depending on the application. I find that two thin layers works better than one thick one and will result in less cracking. It isn't as strong as plaster which is why I switch to plaster of paris for areas near the front of the benchwork.

 

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Finger Lakes
  • 561 posts
Posted by TBat55 on Sunday, March 8, 2009 11:29 AM

I used Joint Compound too thick, and it cracked (a lot).  It's also very, very heavy compared to plaster and lightweight Hydrocal.  I had to add another leg just to support the weight.

Terry

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Utica, OH
  • 4,000 posts
Posted by jecorbett on Saturday, March 7, 2009 8:13 PM

reklein

I prefer sculptamold over both plaster and joint compound.

I use all three since each has its advantages and disadvantages. There's no reason to limit ourselves to a single technique in any phase of this hobby. Sculptamold is by far the most workable, but the draw back is cost so I only use it for small landforms. Lately I've used it instead of rock molds to model rock faces and outcroppings. The somewhat lumpy text makes it ideal for creating realistic rock formations. Joint compound has a longer working time than plaster but as has been pointed out, it tends to crack and is not as strong as plaster. I use plaster of paris where I need strength, such as near the front of the layout where it might take some abuse. Plaster has the shortest working time of the three.

I posted this pic in WPF but am reposting it hear to show how I I used the various products.

The walls of the cuts leading to the tunnel are Sculptamold formations. I used joint compound to for the base layer for the walls and to give the Sculptamold something to grip. The hill itself started with a layer of red resin paper over cardboard webbing. This picture was take before applying the hard surface. I first put down a base layer of joint compound about 2/3 of the way back from the aisle. After it had set, I came back and added a layer of plaster of paris over the front third to give me extra strength. The back third I didn't even bother with a solid surface. I just glued the polyfiber trees directly to the resin paper. You can't see it and I don't need any strength since that is all behind the track where no hands should ever go.

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
  • 1,317 posts
Posted by Seamonster on Saturday, March 7, 2009 7:08 PM

I prefer joint compound.  It doesn't require any mixing, just scoop it out of the pail and apply it.  It stays workable for a long time and is easily carved as it starts to set.  It does take a long time to completely set.  I leave it alone for at least a day or two.  I use an offset trowell like a cake icing pallette or an artist's pallett to apply it.  I've never had any problems with it shrinking and cracking, I guess because I'm aware of having to keep the coats fairly thin.  I guess drywalling my basement walls taught me that.  I use plaster for rock moulds though.

 

..... Bob

Beam me up, Scotty, there's no intelligent life down here. (Captain Kirk)

I reject your reality and substitute my own. (Adam Savage)

Resistance is not futile--it is voltage divided by current.

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Amish country Tenn.
  • 10,027 posts
Posted by loathar on Saturday, March 7, 2009 6:35 PM

reklein

I prefer sculptamold over both plaster and joint compound.

I agree it's a great product, but not very good if you want to carve brick or stone shapes in it.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Lewiston ID
  • 1,710 posts
Posted by reklein on Saturday, March 7, 2009 3:24 PM

I prefer sculptamold over both plaster and joint compound. You can put it on in layers an inch deep and it still dries without cracking, it is more controllable ,stays where you put, it than plaster. Has a better texture than plaster,yet can still be smoothed out for roads etc, with a moistened trowel. Makes a little softer base for trees etc,and is easier to carve than either plaster or joint compound. BILL

In Lewiston Idaho,where they filmed Breakheart pass.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Saturday, March 7, 2009 11:10 AM

I cast my stone walls with Hydrocal and rubber molds.  Hydrocal is specifically for casting, and picks up the fine detail very well.  I then put each individual casting piece in place on the wall, trimming and cutting as necessary.  If you wait about 10-12 minutes after pouring the Hydrocal into the mold, you can carefully shape it around a curve so that it will take the shape you want.  The molds I have are typically 3 inches high, and about 6 to 8 inches long.  Hydrocal takes paints and stains well, and an India Ink wash will really bring out the details.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Amish country Tenn.
  • 10,027 posts
Posted by loathar on Saturday, March 7, 2009 9:25 AM

I like plaster better than mud. It's seems a little stronger. I've had problems with mud shrinking and cracking if it's applied too thick. Takes longer to dry too. 
My preference is dryer softener sheets dipped in cheap plaster O Paris. Adding a little bit of vinegar helps slow the curing process if it's setting up too fast for you.

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Orig: Tyler Texas. Lived in seven countries, now live in Sundown, Louisiana
  • 25,640 posts
Posted by jeffrey-wimberly on Saturday, March 7, 2009 9:22 AM

 I've used both joint compound and plaster. The joint compound has to be put on in thin layers and each layer has to dry before another layer is applied. If not it will crack! Plaster can be used almost anywhere and can be mixed to almost any consitency. I've mixed it so that it can be poured in almost like a thin slurry up to putting it on like a thick cream. I've had very few cracking issues with it.

Running Bear, Sundown, Louisiana
          Joined June, 2004

Dr. Frankendiesel aka Scott Running Bear
Space Mouse for president!
15 year veteran fire fighter
Collector of Apple //e's
Running Bear Enterprises
History Channel Club life member.
beatus homo qui invenit sapientiam


  • Member since
    January 2009
  • 7 posts
joint compound vs plaster
Posted by jimmbo68 on Saturday, March 7, 2009 9:00 AM

Hi all, quick question. What are your preferances to cover spray foam to create retaining walls or mountains? I may just paint the mountains, but the walls need to be etched to stone or block.Thanks for any and all responses.

 

Jim

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!