Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Insulated or live switches for DCC?

1622 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: United Kingdom
  • 552 posts
Insulated or live switches for DCC?
Posted by bsteel4065 on Friday, February 20, 2009 6:19 AM

I know, I know, I know! There have been a squillion threads about this but I'm now laying track on my new HO layout and I want to make REALLY sure.

I'm using Peco code 83 flexitrack HO and Peco code 83 HO switches. I am totally DCC with NCE, and will have Tortoise switch motors that will changed using my NEC hand held and NEC Switch 8 or similar. OK...... Insulated switches (Insulfrog in Peco terminology) to powered switches (Electrofrog)?

I am convinced the choice is insulated (and I know I can cut the wiring under the electrofrog if necessary.) Before I buy...................

INSULATED (Insulfrog) or LIVE (electrofrog)?

Thanks as always!!!!

Barry Cool  

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 148 posts
Posted by Wazzzy on Friday, February 20, 2009 5:23 PM

it makes no difference. it all depends on your loco wheel spacing and wheel electrical pick-up for live or dead frog. appearance is another factor. as long as the turnout is DCC ready for your senerio you will be just fine. i prefer live frog for electrical reliability. a quality turnout will make a huge difference in the overall performance of your layout. the higher cost is minimal with the results acquired.

it is important to determine if the turnout is power routing or not. this will determine your wiring lead requirements. the LHS 'should' let you handle and test the turnout to see if it meets your needs before the purchase.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: United Kingdom
  • 552 posts
Posted by bsteel4065 on Saturday, February 21, 2009 6:07 AM

Thanks Wazzy

I must admit I have always been for electrofrog (live routing) and used them on my DC layout. They are excellent and I have never had any problems with them.

I have Pennsy M1a's and big locos and F7's, F3's so travel over the switches is no problem with insulated frogs if I used them. The smallest I have are in the yards (lots of switches of course) and they are SW7's that still will handle insulfrogs.

In planning, I bought one of each switch size (and co-incidentally electrofrog) so I could photocopy them and place them out to confirm my plan. So I have a one off set of each size to start with.

Looks and quality? I think Peco code 83 are very good quality and they work! Yes, the electrofrog may be said to very slightly better looking but the aesthetic difference is minimal.  

Thanks again!

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Germany
  • 524 posts
Posted by faraway on Saturday, February 21, 2009 8:22 AM

 All your engines have no problem to pass isolated frogs without problems and suddenly the cute and very short 45 tons switcher became available....

Don't take the risk. You don't know your rosters in 5 years. Electrofrogs are some kind of an assurance. Most time not needed but if...

Reinhard

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,237 posts
Posted by tstage on Saturday, February 21, 2009 10:42 AM

Barry,

Obviously, if you've used live frogs on your DC layout then you already know the ins and outs (and additional work) of wiring them.  It's a personal choice that's contingent on a number of things.

I am a recent convert to live frogs and, for me, the extra effort is worth it - both for appearance and operationally.  Although I didn't have any problems with my larger locomotives on insulated frogs, I did on a few of my smaller switches - diesel and steam - so I moved from Atlas turnouts to Fast Track turnouts.  Wow!  What a difference!

Since I can buy the turnouts individually online, I can buy the few turnouts needed in the sizes that I need.  And an already assembled, painted, and wired FT turnout wasn't much more than a Peco turnout.   Knowing the turnouts will perform everytime without my locomotives stalling or hesitating is worth it - for me.

I will admit there has been a learning curve since this is all new to me.  But, I've enjoyed the "education" of learning how to wire my layout for DCC, as well as installing the Caboose Industries 220S ground throws so that they work properly.

Barry, since you've already made up your mind which way you'll be going with your turnouts, I guess there's no further need for me to spout off things that you already know.  I hope the new turnouts will work well for you...

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: United Kingdom
  • 552 posts
Posted by bsteel4065 on Saturday, February 21, 2009 11:36 AM

Hi Tom

Just looked at your layout. What lights do you use? (For example at the end of the diesel fuelling facility.) They look good. And is the ash pit conveyor Walthers?

 Cheers

Barry

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Elburn, IL
  • 42 posts
Posted by jtsgarage on Saturday, February 21, 2009 9:00 PM

Barry,

 I have a very similair layout with Peco and NCE.  I have used insulfrog turnouts with very good success.  I run mostly diesels, and have no trouble with them.  Have also used tortise and wabbit for turnout control.  Hope this helps.

Jeff

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: United Kingdom
  • 552 posts
Posted by bsteel4065 on Sunday, February 22, 2009 12:37 PM

Thanks Jeff!

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!