Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Track Plan for a small "L" shaped layout

10543 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 3 posts
Track Plan for a small "L" shaped layout
Posted by SD45 Man on Sunday, January 25, 2009 11:20 PM

 Hi everyone.  I was wondering if anyone has a good idea for a small "L" shaped layout.  What I am looking at is two 2"x4" modules that I would like to arrange in an L shape.  I model in "N" scale and plan on modeling the late 1950's, so locomotives and rolling stock will be small.  I know this size is not ideal, but as a lot of you can relate to space at this time is not available.  I would really just like to build something to polish up on my scenery skills, and something to keep me busy.  I would desire something with some operational potential, three to four small industries to switch, maybe a small interchange yard/track. 

For sure I am going to include a team track as the operational potential seems fantastic.  But what do you all think?  is it possible to get decent operating out of a layout this size? Any ideas or suggestions on places to look would be appreciated.

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • From: Traverse City, MI
  • 266 posts
Posted by camaro on Monday, January 26, 2009 7:11 AM

Do you prefer a continuous running layout over a switching layout? The curves would appear to be tight if you are trying to turn the entire train with only 24" of width to work with. The new Model Railroader layouts book maybe of some help.  It did have some shelf style layouts that may fit the bill.

 

http://www.trains.com/mrr/default.aspx?c=a&id=2823

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Monday, January 26, 2009 8:17 AM

I'd also endorse looking at the 102 Trackplans book. In N scale 11"R is roughly equivalent to 22-24"R in HO so you could do continous running if you're content to stick with 40-50' freight cars. Any diesel from the fifties should work OK on 11" radius, like GP's or SD's, RS-3's etc. Passenger cars might not look so good though they might be able to do the sharp curves, but generally for passenger trains you'd want to look at 15-18"R.

Stix
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 3 posts
Posted by SD45 Man on Monday, January 26, 2009 7:37 PM

I would prefer continuous running, and plan to use two GP-9's for power.  I plan to put in some type of small Gypsum plant so I can use short PS-2 covered hoppers.  I also plan on a small grain/farm co-op type industry so I can use the short box cars of the 1950's

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Westcentral Pennsylvania (Johnstown)
  • 1,496 posts
Posted by tgindy on Monday, January 26, 2009 8:36 PM

The earlier suggestion for "102 Realistic Track Plans" is right on target, and; the special issue is still at hobby shops & book stores beside this year's "Model Railroad Planning 2009"...

http://www.trains.com/mrr/default.aspx?c=a&id=957

Another great resource is Spookshow's (N Scale) Model Trains under the Layouts Section where the author discusses, in very straight-forward language, trials & errors with a number of layouts, with an ample supply of photos, not to mention documented experience with minimum radius issues...

http://www.visi.com/~spookshow/trainstuff.html

Conemaugh Road & Traction circa 1956

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: good ole WI
  • 1,326 posts
Posted by BerkshireSteam on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 5:28 PM

wjstix

I'd also endorse looking at the 102 Trackplans book. In N scale 11"R is roughly equivalent to 22-24"R in HO so you could do continous running if you're content to stick with 40-50' freight cars. Any diesel from the fifties should work OK on 11" radius, like GP's or SD's, RS-3's etc. Passenger cars might not look so good though they might be able to do the sharp curves, but generally for passenger trains you'd want to look at 15-18"R.

My GP9, 50 foot box car and 50 foot flat car all ran find through some 9 3/4" unpowered test track. I imagine if i actually used it (I used it for testing only to see if they would even work, not neccesarily for my layou) meaning it's on your layout and being powered you would want to run the trains through it slower. I'd still go with 11 inch. After running the GP9 through the 9 3/4 I looked at the positioning of the trucks and they had no more movement left so 9 3/4 is at the loco's limit.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!