Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Aisle Width

12381 views
31 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
ttt
  • Member since
    September 2008
  • 130 posts
Aisle Width
Posted by ttt on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:18 PM

What is the minimum aisle width for being able to walk around and to have enough room so I don't bang into the table when I throw switches?

D & H - Gone but not forgotten
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Fort Worth, Texas
  • 73 posts
Posted by JWARNELL on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:40 PM

  I would say that 22" is the absolute minimum. I have used 22" and it works, but this was a small bedroom layout and I was the only operator. If you want to have room for people to pass in the aisles, then I would recomend at least 36". Of course it all depends on the amount of space you have and the amount of comfort you are willing to sacrifice. I have seen several club layouts that use 24" ailes and they just put up with the crowded condition in order to fit more layout into a given space. 

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 90 posts
Posted by ErnieC on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:06 PM

D&H,

Those who have done research say 22" min. for one operator and 28" min. for 2 people to pass.  If you have the space the wider the better.

Ernie C 

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • 745 posts
Posted by HarryHotspur on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:10 PM

 It depends in part on your size. To test it, put a cardboard box or something on your kitchen counter to bring it up to layout height. Then have someone hold a piece of lumber (2' x 6' or so) vertically about 24 inches behind you, and see how constricted you feel.

- Harry

- Harry

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: SE Minnesota
  • 6,845 posts
Posted by jrbernier on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:12 PM

  I use 36" for basic aisle width, with 30" at a 'pinch' point.  Our club has 48" for a minimum, but it also has two decks/levels.  22" should work if you just need to have access, but you will not be able to 'operate' from such confined aisles.  Of course the 'size' of your body and how high are also going to [lay into this.  An old layout I had had a 30" by 60' pit that I had to get into to switch a mine.  That was in the late 60's when I was a teenager - I am not that flexible now!

Jim

Modeling BNSF  and Milwaukee Road in SW Wisconsin

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Amish country Tenn.
  • 10,027 posts
Posted by loathar on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:16 PM

If your moderatelyWhistling over weight like I am, 24" minimum! I did 20" and I wish I had gone wider.My 2 cents

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:55 PM

Aisleways are definitely not a, "One size fits all," proposition, because modelers come in too many sizes!  Also, be aware that an individual's dimensions will change with time - usually to something bigger!

I'm built like a barrel, so for me 24" is a minimum aisle width.  In order to maintain that, one piece of along-the-wall shelf that was originally drawn straight will have a gently-curving concave fascia when I install it.  I couldn't narrow the end of the adjacent benchwork, and I won't compromise the aisle width.

The one place where people will interact with each other when I have visiting operators has an irregular 'blob' of floor space, the minimum width of which is 32 inches.  A short side-step will increase that to 40 inches plus.

Interestingly, by designing the aisleways first, I found that the track schematic I was trying to implement just fell into place.  Sometimes, you get lucky!

Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: THE FAR, FAR REACHES OF THE WILD, WILD WEST!
  • 3,672 posts
Posted by R. T. POTEET on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 1:18 AM

An awful lot, my dear friend, will depend upon whether you weigh 150# or 350#; if you weigh 350# then a 22" aisle width ain't likely to feed the bulldog! John Armstrong said that an 18" aisle width would be acceptable as long as it was short; I weigh in at 160# with a 32" girth and I can tell you that I don't feel very comfortable at all squeezing through an 18" aisle I don't care how short it is!

From the far, far reaches of the wild, wild west I am: rtpoteet

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,478 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 8:15 AM

Murphy's Railroad Law #1:

"The number of wide bodies visiting your railroad at the same time will be directly and inversely proportional to the narrowness of the aisles."

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Warren, MI O scaler
  • 553 posts
Posted by el-capitan on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 8:39 AM

If I could do it again, I would keep it to 36" standard and 28" for short sections. I stuck to this for the most part but I have one section that squeezes to 22" and I hate it. In addition, this section has switching on both sides of the aisle.... not good.

 Check out the Deming Sub by clicking on the pics:

Deming Sub Deming Sub

  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: Phoenixville, PA
  • 3,495 posts
Posted by nbrodar on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:08 AM

 In my younger (and thinner) days, I used 18 inches as a minimum for a non-operating aisle.  Now I use 24 inches as a minimum regardless.   I try to keep my aisles 30 inches or wider.

Nick

Take a Ride on the Reading with the: Reading Company Technical & Historical Society http://www.readingrailroad.org/

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Amherst, N.S.
  • 248 posts
Posted by kcole4001 on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:57 AM

Also keep in mind that your visitors, or at the very least wife and kids, need to be able to comfortably access the aisles, so size them accordingly even if you're planning on being the only operator.

Narrow aisles are poor for maintenence and upgrade work also.

"The mess and the magic Triumphant and tragic A mechanized world out of hand" Kevin
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: northern nj
  • 2,477 posts
Posted by lvanhen on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 10:28 AM

I'm lucky, I don't need an aisle for my 4x8!!  When I move (hopefully next year) I will have 24" as an absolute minimum, and at leasy 36" wherever possible.  My 38-40" waist ain't likely to get any smaller - and believe me I try!!Banged Head

Lou V H Photo by John
  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: nw Pa.
  • 106 posts
Posted by Doug T on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 12:00 PM

I have 34 inch aisles and I have under benchwork storage shelves. I am 65, and considered a large man. Being able to access this storage requires space to be able kneel down or bend over without hitting the benchwork.

Things to consider are your age, ability to move freely, your body size and how long this layout will be in use. As you get older your body changes and your ability to move around in limited areas decreases.

ttt
  • Member since
    September 2008
  • 130 posts
Posted by ttt on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 1:36 PM

I'm 14 and I only weigh about 100 lbs but I might be running it with my brother at the same time, so I'll probably go with 24".

D & H - Gone but not forgotten
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: 4610 Metre's North of the Fortyninth on the left coast of Canada
  • 9,298 posts
Posted by BATMAN on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:12 PM
I started at 24" but moved to 20" after I ordered a 2-10-4 Sunset models Selkirk. It required a 30" radius. We have many friends and the house is always full of company. A couple of Saturdays back when the men came into the trainroom to see the progress two of the wives followed and came to a screeching halt when they saw they could not squeeze through that 20" space. I felt a little embarresed for them but soon realized that being able to run a Selkirk was more important. Besides all the men could get in and that was the important thing. Brent

Brent

"All of the world's problems are the result of the difference between how we think and how the world works."

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,478 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Thursday, October 30, 2008 8:29 AM

Another unmentioned factor so far is that the narrower the asiles the more lilley damage to the surfaces of the railroad including buildings and equipment are likley to occur as people lean over to pass.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Thursday, October 30, 2008 9:41 AM

On an older layout that had severe space restrictions I ended up with one short (36" deep) aisle that was only 14" wide, now I'm 6'0 200+something pounds and if I inhaled deep enough before I ventured in I was OK, but I dont recommend it, it was too tight so when I rebuilt the layout I eliminated the aisleway. Today I wouldnt go any narrower than 20" for limited access aisles, if its a primary access aisle 24"

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Thursday, October 30, 2008 11:52 AM

I"m 6'1" and weight about 220 and I dont think that at my age I'm going to get any smaller, so my one aisle on the Yuba River Sub is 36" wide.  That's also where the main controls are on the MR, so I have to be comfortable when I run trains.  Since I'm a 'lone wolf', I don't have much in the way of company, but when someone does come over to see the layout, there's still room for two or three of us to fit in if we don't try and dance, LOL!

Tom Tongue

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,202 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Thursday, October 30, 2008 12:10 PM

My last layout had 2 aisles 24" and 30". The track was at 58".  The layout felt claustrophobic even though I could get through it all right.  My under construction layout at 50" high has 36" minimum aisles.  That feels a lot better. 

Enjoy

Paul 

If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Thursday, October 30, 2008 12:33 PM

IRONROOSTER

My last layout had 2 aisles 24" and 30". The track was at 58".  The layout felt claustrophobic even though I could get through it all right.  My under construction layout at 50" high has 36" minimum aisles.  That feels a lot better. 

Enjoy

Paul 

I think the claustrophobia factor is a function of layout height as much as aisleway width.  My entrance aisleway is 32" wide (passageway only.)  With a towering fascia (60" track level) on one side, a solid wall on the other and a shelf on that wall that's slightly above my head (I clear the brackets by about 10mm) it's downright scary!  OTOH, a narrower access aisleway with fascia levels of 42 and 45 inches feels like the wide open spaces.

One side of that narrow aisleway may get a second deck sometime in the future - maybe.  I wonder what that will do to the claustrophobia factor.

Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Thursday, October 30, 2008 8:37 PM

 Twice as wide as one thinks the minimum should be.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,202 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Friday, October 31, 2008 12:03 PM

tomikawaTT

IRONROOSTER

My last layout had 2 aisles 24" and 30". The track was at 58".  The layout felt claustrophobic even though I could get through it all right.  My under construction layout at 50" high has 36" minimum aisles.  That feels a lot better. 

Enjoy

Paul 

I think the claustrophobia factor is a function of layout height as much as aisleway width.  My entrance aisleway is 32" wide (passageway only.)  With a towering fascia (60" track level) on one side, a solid wall on the other and a shelf on that wall that's slightly above my head (I clear the brackets by about 10mm) it's downright scary!  OTOH, a narrower access aisleway with fascia levels of 42 and 45 inches feels like the wide open spaces.

One side of that narrow aisleway may get a second deck sometime in the future - maybe.  I wonder what that will do to the claustrophobia factor.

Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

 

I agree, that's why I listed the height.   If I decide to do another layout at 58" I'll try to use 42" or wider aisles to avoid that closed in feeling.

Enjoy

Paul 

If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Warren, MI O scaler
  • 553 posts
Posted by el-capitan on Friday, October 31, 2008 12:18 PM

Texas Zepher

 Twice as wide as one thinks the minimum should be.

I believe this also applies to staging yards.

 Check out the Deming Sub by clicking on the pics:

Deming Sub Deming Sub

  • Member since
    October 2015
  • 163 posts
Posted by Butlerhawk on Saturday, November 1, 2008 9:44 AM
Just measured my one and only aisle width - 13"; I have to move sideways the 8' length of the aisle. Very narrow, but it works for me and does give me more layout room.
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Lilburn, GA
  • 966 posts
Posted by CSXDixieLine on Saturday, November 1, 2008 9:54 AM

My N-scale layout has a U-shaped aisle that is 30" wide and briefly pinches down to 24" to fit around a helix blob. In ideal circumstances (a lrger room), I would have established a minimum width of 36", although I have to say I was quite surprised at how roomy the 30" aisles are now that I have the benchwork in. Of course, my layout is designed for just one or two operators or maybe a visitor or two every now and then; it certainly could not support a full blown operating "crew." Jamie

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, November 1, 2008 11:41 AM

 You can get a sense of size by looking at doorways. A typical interior door is 30". If you have larger exterior doors they are probably 36".

                    --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Saturday, November 1, 2008 11:51 AM

rrinker

 You can get a sense of size by looking at doorways. A typical interior door is 30". If you have larger exterior doors they are probably 36".

                    --Randy

An excellent point.  Another is, are you measuring the distance between fascia lines, or the actual clearance?  Card boxes, cupholders and such are like little mice, gnawing away at aisle width while you aren't watching them.  Even a clip to hold a switch list can be a literal PITA if it's located at the narrowest point in an aisle that is used frequently.

As for a 13" aisle - at any height above 24" from the floor, I'd fit it like a champagne cork...Laugh

Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964 - with minimum 600mm aisle clearance)

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Shenandoah Valley The Home Of Patsy Cline
  • 1,842 posts
Posted by superbe on Saturday, November 1, 2008 12:15 PM

My layout is J shaped. The short isle at the bottom of the J is 19". This works for me as my yard is on the (or will be) on the short leg of the J so I want to be close anyway. For larger people 19" would be tight. The remainder of the layout has a 35" isle which is real nice. The larger the better beacuse even though you don't need that extra width, it makes for some enjoyable viewing to stand further back from the layout to watch while the trains are running. The height of the layout would be a factor as well.

Bob

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, November 1, 2008 2:28 PM

 Good point - while there is the claustrophobic feeling with a tall layout, the higher it is, the narrow the aisles can be in some cases. If you have to bend over to look at the layout, there has to be room for your caboose. If you can see everything while standing upright - you don't take as much space.

 But then - if you are making things that tight that you have to worry about exact fitting, you probably need to rethink things and make the aisles a lot wider. Unless you never have friends and family view your layout, it's not a custom fit suit.

                     --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!