Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Color temperature of light incandescent bulbs

4037 views
16 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: New Jersey, US
  • 379 posts
Posted by topcopdoc on Sunday, May 11, 2008 7:56 AM

HarryHotspur,

The second photo which uses the spiral daylight fluorescent matches the normal color of the layout.

I also have incandescent lights in the ceiling which I plan to control with a dimmer switch. My plan of operation when visitors are present, is to have both systems on to simulate daylight. At some point I will switch off the spiral fluorecent bulbs and slowly dim the incandescent bulbs to simulate the setting sun. Finally blue lights will be turned on for nighttime lighting. 

I agree with some of the comments about headaches and fluorescent lighting. Years ago when I worked in a laboratory I experienced eye and head problems and extreme fatigue but only when I worked on the evening shift. It was traced back to the fluorescent lighting.

I have been using the new spiral bulbs for a year so far and have not had a problem.

Doc

 

Pennsylvania Railroad The Standard Railroad of the World
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Seattle Area
  • 1,794 posts
Posted by Capt. Grimek on Saturday, May 10, 2008 7:22 PM
fwright. Thanks for yet another very in depth response. I always learn a lot from you (and apparently not just about model railroading.)


I lived in the Kuskokwim River area of the sub arctic, teaching in an Eskimo village 25 yrs. ago.
The sensitivity to light and to the absence of sunlight is indeed most pronounced.
When we had "midnight sun" (not strictly literal in my area) I couldn't sleep at night even
with no windows in our cabin's bedroom. I could just "feel" the sunlight outside. Hard to describe yet very real...

Jackn2mpu, I believe you. Full spectrum lights hurt my eyes and head within a few minutes also. Some of us are just more sensitive than most. My reason as stated is
migrainer, but yours may be for a different yet very real reason.

It's definitely going to be incandescent for me.

Raised on the Erie Lackawanna Mainline- Supt. of the Black River Transfer & Terminal R.R.

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • 745 posts
Posted by HarryHotspur on Saturday, May 10, 2008 6:50 PM

Topcopdoc,

Which photo most closely matches the colors on your layout?

- Harry

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: NJ
  • 414 posts
Posted by jackn2mpu on Saturday, May 10, 2008 5:14 PM
 ratled wrote:

You really should reconsider your use of fluorescent bulbs in your planning.  As our down under and northern friends know that these are coming weather we want them or not.  They have a mandatory use coming in 2012.  Most likely we will too.  A quick search will show all the bad news such as this

http://www.krcgonline.com/news/news_story.aspx?id=81580

As for the hazard it's not as bad as the federal PSA make it seem - yea they already made a Public Service Announcement on how to clean up and dispose of the bulbs.  To me it's les then gasoline being a hazardous material and needs a trained technician to dispense (sorry Oregon guys).

Regular fluorescents give me a headache after a short while and I find that the full spectrum lights help.  They also won't fade you layout like standard ones will

ratled

How many times can I say it and get it through some people's thick skulls:

Flourescents are NOT an option! I have eye issues with them, and no matter what anybody says, even the so-called full spectrum or daylighter flourescents are a real pain for me to deal with.

And what I have to say about thay idiot in the White House and some of his policies aren't printable in public. We'll be under his 'beneficience' for years to come even after he's out of office. Sorry for the political rant but that's the way I see it.

de N2MPU Jack

Proud NRA Life Member and supporter of the 2nd. Amendment

God, guns, and rock and roll!

Modeling the NYC/NYNH&H in HO and CPRail/D&H in N

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: Colorado
  • 4,075 posts
Posted by fwright on Saturday, May 10, 2008 5:36 AM

Capt

There are 2 general types of flourescent lighting - those with magnetic ballasts (old style) and those with electronic ballasts.  Flourescent lights with magnetic ballasts operated at 60 Hz (power line frequency) and often did visibly flicker, especially as the tube aged.

The newer electronic ballasts tend (but not always) to operate at a much higher frequency for greater power efficiency.  I dare say very, very few can see the flicker from a warmed-up CFL, although just because it's not visible doesn't mean there is no "flicker" effect.  But the combination of new phosphors and higher frequency have eliminated the flicker effect for almost all.

But there are plenty of old-style flourescents still in use, especially in non-residential buildings, to give people such as yourself problems.  All I am really saying is give modern flourescents a chance - you might be pleasantly surprised.

FWIW, the only reason an incandescent bulb doesn't "flicker" is the time lag in change of filament temperature from a change in current.  The time lag is great enough that the sinusodial 60 Hz AC just affects the average filament temperature rather than the instantaneous.

Also, FWIW, when I ran a military unit in Kodiak, Alaska we switched to high frequency, full-spectrum flourescent lighting from the standard cool white magnetic ballast tubes.  The switch in frequency was an energy saving measure, but we had to fight for the extra money to pay for the full spectrum tubes.  We had a siginificant decline in behavior and depression problems during the dark Alaska winter after the change.  The XO and I ended up calling the full spectrum lights "happy lights", and became believers.

It is the UV portion of the spectrum that causes most of the color fading.  Incadescent bulbs run at such a cool temperature (spectrum-wise) that the UV output is effectively nil.  Some flourescent bulbs and tubes put out more UV spectrum than others.  The full spectrum and cooler temperature ("warm white") bulbs will put out less UV than traditional "harsh white" bulbs. 

Fred W 

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Seattle Area
  • 1,794 posts
Posted by Capt. Grimek on Friday, May 9, 2008 8:33 PM
Slightly off subject, but not really: Just an FYI for folks who aren't aware of this situation, but migraine sufferers like myself are very sensitive to florescent lighting. I (and other migrainers) can actually SEE the oscillations from the ballast to bulb effect. They will trigger a headache in me and many others in only a few minutes. That may be why you've experienced them yourself.
I've been told that the daylight variety won't, but they do with me, unfortunately.

I've been counting my lucky stars that all three of the round robin layouts I've been operating on have had incandescent lighting!

I'll have to go with incandescent and that may be one reason why layouts you visit have chosen them.

When I taught elementary school, I had to get special permission to use incandescent lighting in my classroom. There has even been some clinical evidence that florescent lighting triggers hyper activity
in kids who are prone to it. I found it to be true in my classroom after we changed lighting.

I WAS wondering however which lighting (especially) incandescent is prone to fading scenery and model colors over time.

Raised on the Erie Lackawanna Mainline- Supt. of the Black River Transfer & Terminal R.R.

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • 569 posts
Posted by ratled on Friday, May 9, 2008 10:34 AM

You really should reconsider your use of fluorescent bulbs in your planning.  As our down under and northern friends know that these are coming weather we want them or not.  They have a mandatory use coming in 2012.  Most likely we will too.  A quick search will show all the bad news such as this

http://www.krcgonline.com/news/news_story.aspx?id=81580

As for the hazard it's not as bad as the federal PSA make it seem - yea they already made a Public Service Announcement on how to clean up and dispose of the bulbs.  To me it's les then gasoline being a hazardous material and needs a trained technician to dispense (sorry Oregon guys).

Regular fluorescents give me a headache after a short while and I find that the full spectrum lights help.  They also won't fade you layout like standard ones will

ratled

Modeling the Klamath River area in HO on a proto-lanced sub of the SP “The State of Jefferson Line”

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: New Hampshire
  • 459 posts
Posted by ChrisNH on Friday, May 9, 2008 8:32 AM

I use Compact Flourescents. They will fit in your incandescent sockets, use less power, and run a lot cooler. I purchased a number of GE 6500k "daylight" 10W (40W equiv) and mounted them two on each side of the backdrop of my 3x5 N layout. They provide a nice even daylight. Maybe a little too blue.. on my next one I may try 5000K lights but these look nice and were $6 a pair at Walmart. 

The only downside is they don't dim. Even the ones labeled "Dimmable" will produce a buzzing sound.

At some point I plan to buy at least a couple high CI (color Index) bulbs and see if it makes a difference. Those bulbs should, if I understand it, have a much more even range of color regardless of color temperature where normal CF bulbs can be a bit spikey.

Chris 

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Thursday, May 8, 2008 7:19 AM

The bulbs I use in my softboxes are:

Falconeyes brand  FE3005-10

24W  Color temp  5000-5500K

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Thursday, May 8, 2008 7:10 AM

A) I am not aware of any daylight incandescent bulbs. Incandescent bulbs change color when they are dimmed.

B) The compact fluorescent bulbs that screw into a standard incandescent socket DO come in daylight. I use 24 of them in each softbox in my camera room. Brightness is controlled by turning some of the bulbs off.

C) Unless you are shooting film, color should not be a problem in your photos because most digital cameras have the ability to compensate for ambient color temperature, though it may not be automatic, you may have to select it with a switch.

D) I am a fan of the KISS principle. I, therefore, tend to shy away from gels and other light modifiers if possible.

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: NJ
  • 414 posts
Posted by jackn2mpu on Thursday, May 8, 2008 6:52 AM
 dstarr wrote:

  Daylight is 6000 degrees Kelvin.  Incandescents run around 1/2 of that, the limitation is melting of the tungstun filament.  Actually the really bright photo flood bulbs and the halogen bulbs run a little warmer than plain old supermarket light bulbs, at the sacrifice of 90% of bulb life.  Plain old light bulbs last 1000 hours, the photoflood bulbs are gone in a hundred hours. However the difference in color temp isn't enough to effect color film.  Color film is fussier than the human eye so the small difference in color temp won't show to the eye.

   The eye adapts to color.  Put on green sunglasses and at first the world looks green.  After 5 or 10 minutes colors look normal again.  Color under incandescents is actually much redder than under daylight, but the eye never notices.  It adapts to the redder light and colors look right again.  So if you aren't thinking in terms of photography, ordinary incadescents will make your layout look fine, and if you want to do photography, buy "tungstun" color film and the colors will come out right.

    The new fluorescent bulbs, the ones about 1 inch in diameter with electronic ballasts, are a lot better color wise than the old "cool white"  tubes.  They do come with color temp ratings as high as 5000 Kelvin.  Visit a lighting store and bring some red test items along.  You may be pleasantly surprised by how good the new fluorescents look.    

As I mentioned in my original post, flourescents are not an option as I cannot install new fixtures; I'm working with existing ones. And I have issues with cfl's as well (see another reply post by me here).

Having changed over to digital photography a couple of years back, color balance film useage is not a worry for me. Just set the right color balance on my camera or shoot RAW and work in Photohsop. 

de N2MPU Jack

Proud NRA Life Member and supporter of the 2nd. Amendment

God, guns, and rock and roll!

Modeling the NYC/NYNH&H in HO and CPRail/D&H in N

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: NJ
  • 414 posts
Posted by jackn2mpu on Thursday, May 8, 2008 6:42 AM
 BlueHillsCPR wrote:

I'll have to do some searching around.  I was not aware that anyone was making a "full spectrum" incandescent.  If you are going with incandescent I wonder why you say flourescent is not an option.  I'm thinking compact flourecsent not tubular.

Here are some links, not sure if they will be of much use or not.

http://users.mis.net/~pthrush/lighting/glow.html 

http://www.assumption.edu/users/bniece/Spectra/HiResolution/Wg.pdf

http://web.ncf.ca/jim/misc/cfl/index.html

http://www.grassrootsstore.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=307 

Thanks for the links; it'll give me something to check on.

The reason I say flourescent is not an option is that I can't install new fixtures. I'm working with existing fixtures. I've tried and have issues with cfl's as well, personal as well as  electronic interference as well. Another issue with these that most people don't realize is they have the same disposal issues as regular tubular flourescents have - they both contain small amounts of hazardous chemicals (mercury IIRC).

de N2MPU Jack

Proud NRA Life Member and supporter of the 2nd. Amendment

God, guns, and rock and roll!

Modeling the NYC/NYNH&H in HO and CPRail/D&H in N

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: New Jersey, US
  • 379 posts
Posted by topcopdoc on Wednesday, May 7, 2008 7:10 PM

Here is my experience with both types of layout lighting.

I have my layout in my garage and I finally set up some room lighting. I got a sale on some fluorescent spiral light bulbs at Walgreen's. I bought some work lights at Home Depot and installed them using a 1x2 wood piece as a track.

Besides the low cost for everything I can move the light any place on the bar to get the best lighting. At the same time I set up a set of work lights with 85-Watt Tungsten floodlights and attached them to the bar. I plan to add a dimmer switch later on so that I can dim the lights for nighttime scenes.

Here is the scene with regular Tungsten 85 Watt floodlights.

 

 

Here is a picture with 100-Watt daylight bulbs.

 

 

The fluorescent bulbs actually only use 14 to 25 Watts.

I didn't realize what a difference in color the daylight bulbs made. It should be great for taking photos of the layout.

Doc

Pennsylvania Railroad The Standard Railroad of the World
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Southern California
  • 47 posts
Posted by BurbankAV on Wednesday, May 7, 2008 3:59 PM

My own recommendation would be to just use CTB gels.  These are theatrical gels that are specifically designed to convert tungsten color temp (3200K) to cooloer (bluer colors).  Full CTB will convert you to full 6500K, while 1/2CTB will convert to 4100K.

My plan (once I get something other than bare plywood to light) is to use progressive layers of 1/4CTB to provide bluer light toward the top of the room and warmer light lower down.

The gels are cheap (a $5 sheet will go a long way) and last forever.  Just make sure you leave adequate ventilation for your bulbs and fixtures.

Peter 

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Franconia, NH
  • 3,130 posts
Posted by dstarr on Wednesday, May 7, 2008 1:42 PM

  Daylight is 6000 degrees Kelvin.  Incandescents run around 1/2 of that, the limitation is melting of the tungstun filament.  Actually the really bright photo flood bulbs and the halogen bulbs run a little warmer than plain old supermarket light bulbs, at the sacrifice of 90% of bulb life.  Plain old light bulbs last 1000 hours, the photoflood bulbs are gone in a hundred hours. However the difference in color temp isn't enough to effect color film.  Color film is fussier than the human eye so the small difference in color temp won't show to the eye.

   The eye adapts to color.  Put on green sunglasses and at first the world looks green.  After 5 or 10 minutes colors look normal again.  Color under incandescents is actually much redder than under daylight, but the eye never notices.  It adapts to the redder light and colors look right again.  So if you aren't thinking in terms of photography, ordinary incadescents will make your layout look fine, and if you want to do photography, buy "tungstun" color film and the colors will come out right.

    The new fluorescent bulbs, the ones about 1 inch in diameter with electronic ballasts, are a lot better color wise than the old "cool white"  tubes.  They do come with color temp ratings as high as 5000 Kelvin.  Visit a lighting store and bring some red test items along.  You may be pleasantly surprised by how good the new fluorescents look.    

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 1,089 posts
Posted by BlueHillsCPR on Wednesday, May 7, 2008 11:39 AM

I'll have to do some searching around.  I was not aware that anyone was making a "full spectrum" incandescent.  If you are going with incandescent I wonder why you say flourescent is not an option.  I'm thinking compact flourecsent not tubular.

Here are some links, not sure if they will be of much use or not.

http://users.mis.net/~pthrush/lighting/glow.html 

http://www.assumption.edu/users/bniece/Spectra/HiResolution/Wg.pdf

http://web.ncf.ca/jim/misc/cfl/index.html

http://www.grassrootsstore.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=307 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: NJ
  • 414 posts
Color temperature of light incandescent bulbs
Posted by jackn2mpu on Wednesday, May 7, 2008 9:54 AM

I want to get light bulbs (incandescent; flourescent isn't an option) to light my layout. Want to make it look light daylight, not necessarily high noon like in another post here. I know from my photograpgy that each light source has a different color temperature, and what the typical color temp for daylight is. Plus, with my color temp meter, I can go outside and measure daylight. Fair enough.

The problem comes about when trying to find a suitable light bulb. Neither GE, Philips, or any of the other incandescent manufacturers put light temperature on the sleeves the bulbs come in, and I've found nothing in cursory searches of their websites. Unfortunately, Home Depot, Ace, or any of the other home improvement stores have some place I can screw in a bulb to check with the meter. I know what temp a standard incandescent is, but there are other types on the market. So-called full spectrum bulbs, like the GE Reveal line. Philips makes one as well, I just don't remember the line's name. Does anyone know what the color temp would be, or point me to a web source for such? It could get expensive buying a bulb of each to take home and try out.

Not looking for lighting for photography, but general running of trains. For photography I've got photofloods and Photoshop. 

de N2MPU Jack

Proud NRA Life Member and supporter of the 2nd. Amendment

God, guns, and rock and roll!

Modeling the NYC/NYNH&H in HO and CPRail/D&H in N

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!