marknewton wrote:Ooooh - an ellipsis!Now THAT'S exercising creativity.
Nope :
Rule 14-h : o o o - Whistle signals. When standing, back up. 8-)
Dave H.
Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com
marknewton wrote: JimRCGMO wrote: 1) Thank you, Chip, ICRR, and Stein for your useful information. The debating/point-making does nothing to illuminate.Really? So stating the facts and explaining the reasons why you reached a particular conclusion isn't "illuminating"?
JimRCGMO wrote: 1) Thank you, Chip, ICRR, and Stein for your useful information. The debating/point-making does nothing to illuminate.
1) Thank you, Chip, ICRR, and Stein for your useful information. The debating/point-making does nothing to illuminate.
Peace, guys. Please. Debating _is_ often useful, and can illuminate. As can peaceful dialog.
ICRR and I have been quietly and peacefully working together by email to put together a presentation of Thawville, IL if anyone should want to model the place for the 2x8 contest. It is a very interesting little town.
marknewton wrote: JimRCGMO wrote: 2) Some of us prefer to exercise creativity, rather than be rivet-counters.Ah, so "rivet-counters" aren't creative?
JimRCGMO wrote: 2) Some of us prefer to exercise creativity, rather than be rivet-counters.
2) Some of us prefer to exercise creativity, rather than be rivet-counters.
All forms of model railroading/railroad modelling takes creativity. Relax, guys.
Stein
JimRCGMO wrote:1) Thank you, Chip, ICRR, and Stein for your useful information. The debating/point-making does nothing to illuminate.
dehusman wrote:US shortline engines often had siphons to suck water (and anything else slow) out of creeks if necessary.
US shortline engines often had siphons to suck water (and anything else slow) out of creeks if necessary.
One of my former bosses was a brakeman on the Gurdon-El Dorado local (Arkansas). They had decided to skip coaling becuase they were in a hurry and they thought they had enough for the trip. They ended up having to stop on the way back where the section gang had been changing out ties and load chunks of old ties onto the engine for fuel to nurse it back to the terminal.Dave H.
One of my former bosses was a brakeman on the Gurdon-El Dorado local (Arkansas). They had decided to skip coaling becuase they were in a hurry and they thought they had enough for the trip. They ended up having to stop on the way back where the section gang had been changing out ties and load chunks of old ties onto the engine for fuel to nurse it back to the terminal.
- Harry
HarryHotspur wrote:Where do we view the entries? Or do we just read the arguments?
That's a good one Harry !
TerryinTexas
See my Web Site Here
http://conewriversubdivision.yolasite.com/
The actual contest thread is here:
http://www.trains.com/trccs/forums/1341679/ShowPost.aspx
but the contest isn't over until the 20th and they won't be posted before then.
The past contests are here:
http://www.chipengelmann.com/Trains/4x8Contest.html
http://www.chipengelmann.com/Trains/10x12Contest.html
Chip
Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.
JimRCGMO wrote: (I work in the mental health field)
(I work in the mental health field)
I do believe you've come to the right place.
(More than) 'nuff said.
Jim in Cape Girardeau
tomikawaTT wrote:NS fitted 611 with a standard fire department hose connection so they could take water from hydrants - frequently with the aid of a local fire department pumper. Don't know for sure, but logic would suggest that there should be a basket filter at the discharge end of that filler pipe. Boiler treatment chemicals could have been added from a sack, but that was neither shown nor mentioned.The video I saw this on is titled Norfolk & Western #611, in case anyone wants to check me.
NS fitted 611 with a standard fire department hose connection so they could take water from hydrants - frequently with the aid of a local fire department pumper. Don't know for sure, but logic would suggest that there should be a basket filter at the discharge end of that filler pipe. Boiler treatment chemicals could have been added from a sack, but that was neither shown nor mentioned.
The video I saw this on is titled Norfolk & Western #611, in case anyone wants to check me.
dehusman wrote: marknewton wrote:The other big objection to using water from a hydrant is that it isn't treated in any way, and if my experience is typical, it's got enough rubbish in it to cause problems with foaming and priming. You might use a hydrant in an emergency, but to water regularly like that defies all sense.Unless you are watering an engine in the 1990's when every single water tower has been torn down for 30 or 40 years. Then it makes perfect sense. Fire hydrants become the ONLY water source. 8-)Dave H.
marknewton wrote:The other big objection to using water from a hydrant is that it isn't treated in any way, and if my experience is typical, it's got enough rubbish in it to cause problems with foaming and priming. You might use a hydrant in an emergency, but to water regularly like that defies all sense.
Unless you are watering an engine in the 1990's when every single water tower has been torn down for 30 or 40 years. Then it makes perfect sense. Fire hydrants become the ONLY water source. 8-)
ICRR1964 wrote: Stein, as you stated, you did not find much info on the web I have done the same searches for years and founf almost nothing on the town. Check your PM and send me a personal email back, I have something for you to see, and back my claim that I have some information.
Stein, as you stated, you did not find much info on the web I have done the same searches for years and founf almost nothing on the town. Check your PM and send me a personal email back, I have something for you to see, and back my claim that I have some information.
This seems unnecessarily melodramatic, but whatever - I have sent you an email through the forum with my email address in the body of my message.
Couldn't send you an email direct (ie not via forum) as you requested, since you had not included your email address in the _body text_ of your email (the forum sw apparently strips off sender's email address from the header when it forwards emails to other forum users sent from the web page).
I'm not making any claim to know 100% of what I have as far as documents, pictures, and word of mouth is true here. If some of the posters feel it did not happen that way, wasn't there, and being impossible, thats fine. I have my info and opinion and they have their opinion's. No problem guys, I'll treat this like a poker game like I stated, fold.
Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)
dehusman wrote:...a tender, you would fill from a fire hydrant if anything (actually arranged that too). That's the only water supply, other than an actual water tower, that would provide enough water to fill a tender in anything approaching a reasonable amount of time. Especially if it has a train on the main.Dave H.
...a tender, you would fill from a fire hydrant if anything (actually arranged that too). That's the only water supply, other than an actual water tower, that would provide enough water to fill a tender in anything approaching a reasonable amount of time. Especially if it has a train on the main.
ICRR1964 wrote:No thats Ok Mark. I'm not going to get involved in this even if I do have pictures and facts, It will just draw more debate. Have fun guys!
Umm - this is not in any way intended to insult you, but it would probably work better if you instead of just talking about "having pictures and facts" simply explained in clear terms exactly what you have.
What did you mean by "coal pit" - does your description match the one Dave gave or did your coal pit look different ? Was the coal pit right next to the depot ? Next to some other business ? Somewere else ?
How do you know it was used for recoaling engines (rather than belonging to a local coal dealer who used it as a stockpile to deliver coal retail to local homes and businesses) ?
The most robust evidence would be to have a picture showing people shoveling (or otherwise transferring) coal from the pit into a railroad engine tender. Second most robust would be for you to tell us that you had seen this operation with your own eyes. Third person hearsay can be somewhat reliable. Assumptions are less reliable.
If you explained _how_ you arrived at your conclusion, it could very well be that you are right and Dave and Mark are wrong.
I spent the better part of an hour yesterday (and another hour this morning) looking for pictures (and information) in various online sources to see if I could locate more info on the IC line past Thawville, IL, and pictures from Thawville.
Sadly I didn't find anything that could explain how this coal thing in Thawville worked.
I learned that Thawville (pop 2000: 258) is an unincorporated village in Ridgeland Township, Iroquois County, near the Illinois/Indiana border, south of Chicago.
I went through the lists of people living in enumeration district 46 (Thawville Village, Ridgeland Township, Iroquois County) of Illinois in the last census that is searchable on the net - the 1930 census. Thawville was possibly home base for an IC section (MOW) crew - among the people listed in the village in 1930 is one IC RR section foreman (John Johnson) and one IC RR section laborer (Chas H Pierce). There was also one IC RR agent in Thawville village in 1930 - 20 y.o Marshall Eshleman.
I leafed through the five pages of handwritten census information - spotted several merchants, quite a few school teachers, a couple of mailmen, a baker, a butcher, a mechanic, an electrician etc. No one that (in 1930) was listed as a coal dealer. That's not conclusive either way, though - in a village this size a potensial coal dealership could have been a side business for something else.
And it is not a given that the businesses (and RR jobs) that existed in 1930 were the same as the ones which existed 20-25 years later - around 1950-55.
Anyways - as you can see, I am willing to learn, I am willing to do my own homework and I am willing to share what I find out.
Are you ? It obviously is up to you if you want to do any actual research on Thawville, with the intent of possibly modelling it, or if you just want to go "I know what I know, but I don't want to discuss it".
If you want to do analyze what you got, then we probably learn one of two things :
Either way it is useful info for RR modellers. If you do the latter ("I don't want to discuss this any more"), then nobody learns anything of much value from this discussion about recoaling engines from the ground in small rural/agricultural midwestern communities in the 1950s.
Then the only thing we learn is that some people (like Mark or Dave) like to present the evidence and reasoning they used to support their claims, and other people just get upset when asked how they arrived at their claim. And that's not news - we already know that people are different
But it is your call. I'll stop bugging you about this subject now - if you want to share your sources in a useful way - then that is just great! If not - also okay.
Smile, Stein
If you have pictures and facts share them. No problem. I have no doubt there was a coal yard and if you say there was a water tower I believe you.
But hand shoveling coal into a tender in the 1950's on a class 1 railroad, that's something that would be very, very, very, very rare. You can fill a diesel engine with water from a 1" or so hose. Done it. You can also fill a diesel engine with water from a fire truck. Modern railroads do that every so often. But a tender, you would fill from a fire hydrant if anything (actually arranged that too). That's the only water supply, other than an actual water tower, that would provide enough water to fill a tender in anything approaching a reasonable amount of time. Especially if it has a train on the main.