Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

turnout spacing

3987 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 121 posts
Posted by gerhard_k on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 12:26 PM
Hey, jlugar - I presume that you have seen the posting by Texas Zepher, actually before you posted your question, giving the specifics about track spacing vs. straight-between-turnouts. If not, look back up earlier in this thread.
Atlas has evidently designed both the Customline #4 and #6 turnouts to give a 2" parallel-track spacing if connected face-to-face in a crossover. The turnout # gives the diverging ratio (by definition), so if you want a wider track spacing with the #6, each 1/4" of spacing requires a 6*1/4 = 1-1/2" straight section. With a pair of #4's (which, as already pointed out, are actually #4.5), you'll need 4.5*1/4 = 1-1/8" of straight.
I prefer the Super-Track 83 #6 turnouts, because they don't have the funky truncated ties at the end to clear the railjoiners, and these definitely need their diverging leg trimmed off for a crossover.
- Gerhard
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 2:54 PM
 jlugar wrote:

If anyone is using a #6 to run 2 parallel track together...how far apart are your tracks and how long of a straight are you using between your #6's.(or better)

A crossover between two parallel tracks is actually one of the few places where you don't want to add a straight between the s-curves formed by the turnouts unless it's absolutely necessary to get your desired track-to-track spacing. And that's the benefit of choosing higher numbered turnouts (like #6s) for the crossovers -- even though there is an s-curve formed, it's fairly gentle.

Byron
Model RR Blog

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • 947 posts
Posted by HHPATH56 on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 10:10 AM
Have you considered "double slip switches"?, Perhaps, they are only useful in yards, where slow speed switcher locos are being used to gain access to all of the closely spaced tracks. My long mainline passenger cars and locos never enter the yards, so the S curve problem never occurs.      Bob Hahn
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • 394 posts
Posted by ham99 on Tuesday, January 22, 2008 6:39 PM
I'm using Atlas standard switches with no straight section in some places and have no problems with an Athearn 4-6-6-4 pulling nine Rivarossi 85' passenger cars.  I do slow down to go through them, just like the prototype would.  The only engine that has problems is the Spectrum 4-8-2 -- the pilot wheels have trouble staying on track at various places.  I like the appearance of trains going through S-curves, so I have several on my layout. 
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Amish country Tenn.
  • 10,027 posts
Posted by loathar on Tuesday, January 22, 2008 6:18 PM
Here's another vote for #6's. I can run long passenger cars and auto racks through mine no problem. Your going to limit yourself with snap switches.
I used a straight track around 6-8"'s between mine.
  • Member since
    January 2008
  • 14 posts
Posted by jlugar on Tuesday, January 22, 2008 6:08 PM

Thanks guys....I think you have answered my question. It seems while the snap switch could work okay everyone is suggesting a minimum #6 for good use and low problems.

 

If anyone is using a #6 to run 2 parallel track together...how far apart are your tracks and how long of a straight are you using between your #6's.(or better)

 Your input is appreciated...I am putting much research into building a nice layout without a large learning curve...I hope this forum of people can use their knowledge and experience to help me out....so far they have been a great help.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:12 PM

The problem with crossovers is the S curve.  On snap switches you can't put a long enough straight in place and keep reasonable spacing.  The straight needs to be as long as your longest piece of rollingstock to avoid the problem.  You mitigate the problem by using broader turnouts such as #4 (really 4.5 for Atlas) or #6. One advantage of #4 and #6 over snap switches is they are straight from the frog as opposed to continuing the curve.  This means that a shorter straight needs to be added.  Plus the reduced angle allows a longer straight while maintaining a 2" spacing.  The trade off is that the linear distance of the crossover is increased.

If you're running long cars or engines you should try to stick with #6's, short cars and engines may work with Atlas #4 (4.5) but should be tried first to make sure.  Snap switches should be avoided but may work with very short equipment and/or truck mounted couplers - pushing will probably be a problem, highly recommend you test this before committing to it.  

Enjoy

Paul 

If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Tuesday, January 22, 2008 6:57 AM

How much space do you have for the crossover?

If the straightaway is short, then the snap-switches may be your only choice.  If you've got a bit more room, though, consider using a #6 turnout instead.  You'll greatly reduce the S-curve effect, even if you put the curves very close, because the degree of curvature is so much less.  Also, the less severe curves will allow you to run trains across much faster without problems.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Monday, January 21, 2008 10:09 PM

 TomDiehl wrote:
The spacing of the parallel tracks will determine if you need a short straight section between them. ... the direct connection is for 2 inch spacing (measured at track centers). A wider spacing of the parallel tracks would require a short straight section, but I wouldn't know which one without knowing the spacing.
According to the Atlas book: 

For the custom line #4
Parallel      straight
spacing       length
  2"         -      0"
  2.25"     -      1"
  2 5/8"    -      2 3/4"
  3"         -      4.25"

For the custom line #6
   2"        -        0"
   2.25"    -        1.5"
   2  5/8"  -        4"
   3"        -         5.75"

No idea why they use 5/8" rather than 1/2". 

Don't forget the insulated railjoiners at the crossover.
???? These are Atlas turnouts.

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: East Granby, CT, USA
  • 505 posts
Posted by jim22 on Monday, January 21, 2008 8:49 PM

One reason for a straight section is to lesson the severity of the S-curve cars have to go through to get from one track to the other.  I think I've seen recommendations that a straight section as long as the longest car is needed to negate the effect.  I recommend you assemble some track as you are suggesting and pull a string of cars through.  Make sure they make it through without derailing.  How long are your longest cars?

Jim 

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Poconos, PA
  • 3,948 posts
Posted by TomDiehl on Monday, January 21, 2008 7:43 PM
 jlugar wrote:

Using the standard atlas snap switch turnouts....I want to connect 2 together at the curves and use as a crossover from track to track. Does anyone HIGHLY suggest a short straight be put between them. I think I have read where it is a good idea for trains to  cross through smoother. However I want to keep 2 tracks parrallel and as close together as possible.

Is anyone connecting them without a straight and having no problems?

Thanks

For a simple crossover, you can connect the curved part of the turnouts together directly. The spacing of the parallel tracks will determine if you need a short straight section between them. IIRC, the direct connection is for 2 inch spacing (measured at track centers). A wider spacing of the parallel tracks would require a short straight section, but I wouldn't know which one without knowing the spacing.

Don't forget the insulated railjoiners at the crossover.

Smile, it makes people wonder what you're up to. Chief of Sanitation; Clowntown
  • Member since
    January 2008
  • 14 posts
turnout spacing
Posted by jlugar on Monday, January 21, 2008 7:35 PM

Using the standard atlas snap switch turnouts....I want to connect 2 together at the curves and use as a crossover from track to track. Does anyone HIGHLY suggest a short straight be put between them. I think I have read where it is a good idea for trains to  cross through smoother. However I want to keep 2 tracks parrallel and as close together as possible.

Is anyone connecting them without a straight and having no problems?

 

Thanks

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!